glad Helen Pluckrose is bravely standing by him in this time of trial
but will what role will her new AntiWoke Constabulary play??? more to come
curious about the relationship between "normal right-wing antisemitism" and "vestigial racism," another of James's darlings
I guess the truly just society must be one that maintains the optimal level of antisemitism and racism, which is to say: whatever amount comes from the right
Crucial clarification: Jews don't cause Nazism by being Jewish; Jews cause Nazism by being *woke*
it's so obvious now, Conceptual James is the Lindbergh baby
apparently having *rewritten* parts of Mein Kampf with "woke" language in order to attack "woke" intellectuals means that your current attacks on Jews for being "woke" are... not antisemitic
big brain stuff here
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Maybe these pearls are supposed to land differently when they come from a fully licensed American Thought Leader but IMO this is pretty pedestrian stuff
Idk maybe this being surprising is just what happens when you build a career pretending to be a disaffected leftist while mouthing rightwing talking points. Seems peculiar as a hermeneutic for anyone else though
As we all watch the US in horror, the fact that Quebec has done worse throughout this crisis than *most* US states continues to get zero attention.
All the stupidity we laugh at -- people comparing being asked to wear masks in stores to totalitarianism, anti-mask marches, conspiracy theories, and people flaunting minimal (in fact insufficient) public health measures for the sake of having parties -- is here too, in heaps.
Some were surprised that culture-warriors who began by attacking humanities disciplines in the name of science ended up as Covid-deniers.
But it only makes sense that people who want history without historians would also prefer science without scientists. The issue is expertise.
In both cases there is a widespread belief that the accessibility of "information" (online or in textbooks) obviates the need for academic research.
In both cases there is a failure to consider where that "information" ultimately comes from, and what kind of work it rests upon.
I think a similar naiveté about the kind of "information" past research yields and its fixity across contexts (be they disciplinary or social) plagues some of the more flawed instances of interdisciplinary research that have come in for criticism recently (e.g. portraits/trust).
My daughter was hungry but I was doing the crossword so I told her to make herself some sourdough. Two days later she finally broke. Wish I had more wins like this
also I think we all know the real "editor" of a newspaper is the person in charge of the whole paper, enough with calling every so-and-so in charge of some tiny corner of page B6 an "editor". Feels fraudulent
pls drop the "editor" Mr Gigot. You're just an opinion-writer-organizer