Good news! Western commentators too often conflate Xi’s centralization with his reactionary politics. These need to be conceptually separated—in China and around the world—because progressive politics also requires overcoming fragmented politics, but for very different ends.
https://twitter.com/LiShuo_GP/status/1355465216914427904
A big reason Western commentators interpret centralization under Xi as nothing but authoritarianism is that don’t really know anything about how the Chinese state has operated for the last forty years. So a crude stereotype of monolithic Oriental despotism fills in the gap. 2/
In fact the state became highly fractured among jurisdictions and within officials (their public duties at odds with their private interests). What Xi is attempting with the anti-corruption and Party discipline campaigns is to regain the center’s ability to impose priorities. 3/
The way to judge those priorities is not democracy vs authoritarianism, which only describe the outcome of a social process. It’s on the substance of the social process they build: progressive vs reactionary. /4
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
