If even just 5% of the GOP bolts, it will never win the presidency or the Senate. That would debilitate the party. The rump would only radicalize faster as the MTG slice of the GOP grew its share & marginalized the party.

More will bolt if they have something to bolt towards.
The question for the principled lane is: can we raise enough money and get enough good people to run under an entirely new party banner by 2022 in a way that actually convinces enough voters to break party ranks?

Or are we better off trying to co-opt the GOP with our own banner?
If Trump forms the Patriot Party, he makes things really easy for us—because we’re the only other faction of the center-right with a strong view as to where it should go. Everyone else is just following/positioning.
This is why McCarthy went to Mar-a-Lago. It’s why the GOP is silent on MTG’s craziness. They don’t want to cause Trump to leave the Party. They know if that happens, they have no shot. Their *only* shot is to stay on his coattails.

And his coattails are only getting shorter.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Heath Mayo

Heath Mayo Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HeathMayo

19 Dec 20
The problem with the “Vote Loeffler for divided government” argument isn’t the divided government part. It’s the Loeffler part.

The fact that seemingly conservative ends increasingly require playing footsie with a QAnon-curious candidate is a damning indictment of the GOP.
I mean, come on. It’s pretty obvious the GOP is entirely bereft of leaders when it can’t even muster a Republican Senate nominee with enough spine & common sense to just color somewhat inside the lines and win *Georgia* by 8 points. These shouldn’t be close seats.
This is actually a potential starting point of post-Trump agreement between principled conservatives and Trump’s former supporters: the GOP in its current form needs to be completely replaced.
Read 4 tweets
3 Nov 20
Remember Charlottesville.
Remember Access Hollywood.
Remember Ukraine.
Remember the planned 9/11 Taliban meeting.
Remember his praise for Kim Jong Un & Putin.
Remember how he applauded Xi’s camps.
Remember how he denigrated a Hispanic Article III judge.
Remember his incompetence.
Remember how he disrespected our troops.
Remember how he suggested those who died from COVID weren’t strong.
Remember how he told us we’d only have 15 cases and it’s disappear.
Remember how he said he’d reform healthcare but never did.
Remember how he lied over and over again.
Remember how he disrespected women.
Remember how he started a trade war that didn’t work.
Remember how he said he’d build a wall and that Mexico would pay for it, but ultimately never built it and still asked you to pay.
Read 4 tweets
20 Sep 20
I can’t associate with these Rs. Under Trump, they’ve abandoned most of what I agreed with as a conservative when it came to policy & worse have so embraced his odiousness in how they engage, there are few left I even respect. They want a shrinking circle & can have it. I’m out.
At first, I was set on writing in a name, b/c I am a conservative. I believe in a strong 2A, I’m pro-life, I support robust federalism & a limited fed. gov’t, and I’m worried about runaway spending that both parties have exacerbated. But this election isn’t about those things.
It’s about character and decency and respect for our institutions. It’s about getting back to a certain normalcy instead of constant chaos at the hands of a reality-TV president. It’s about honor and respecting the troops and respecting the dignity of all people.
Read 6 tweets
5 Sep 20
Ok, fine. Here’s a thread of Trump quotes for which Trump himself is the public source:

—“Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab em by the pussy.”
—“[McCain’s] not a war hero. I like people who weren’t captured.”
—“Judge Curiel’s Mexican heritage creates a conflict of interest.” (he was born in Indiana)
—“Kim Jong Un has been, really, somebody I’ve gotten to know very well & respect.” “We fell in love.” “Chairman Kim has been terrific, frankly.”
—“President Xi is a very, very good man.”
—“Putin’s been a leader, far more than Obama has.”
—“That clown Charles Krauthammer”
—“And there’s doubt as to whether Obama was born here. He doesn’t have a birth certificate.”
—“You could see there was blood coming out of [Megyn Kelly’s] eyes, blood coming out of her wherever.”
Read 8 tweets
20 Jul 20
I see this one a lot: "Why do you call yourself a conservative, Heath? You need a new word. It's ruined."

It's a fair point & deserves explanation - because it's true: I do still consider myself a conservative. So, what does that mean?
I'm conservative because I'm skeptical of govt's ability to change society in one swoop. If institutions are flawed, my bias usually is to reform them rather than destroy them, unless they actively offend core principles of justice. There is often wisdom in what's already built.
I also claim conservatism because I believe in the importance of moral virtue & values in a society. I'm not a moral relativist. That doesn't mean that government should go around codifying every value into law. But it does mean that our leaders should live them & be an example.
Read 7 tweets
28 Jun 20
Since Trump is so bad in so many ways, one challenge for principled conservatives is to retain our self-definition by clearly articulating the reasons we reject him. Most are basic & bipartisan (e.g., rule of law, decency, competence, & truth)—others are unique to conservatives.
We conservatives reject Trump because:
—he spent us into record debt thru an economic expansion
—implemented a failed tariff-&-subsidy regime that hammered farmers & consumers
—repeatedly used faith as a prop
—praised dictators & excused human rights abuses
—attacked career LEOs
—violated the constitutional limits on the Exec. by declaring sham “emergency” orders on pet issues he couldn’t get thru Congress
—used antitrust laws to threaten & attack companies he doesn’t like in a non-neutral way
—blindsided military commanders

...off the top of my head.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!