So... I arrived for carer's vaccine appointment this morning, fully in line with rules as I have a contract arranged via the council themselves. I was told the rules had changed over the weekend and anyone looking after only one person was no longer eligible.
"You're joking me, right?" I say. No, sympathetically she says she has been told this very morning (it's 0805) that the rules had changed at the weekend and I cannot have the vaccine. I'm not usually lost for words. I manage not to swear (v impressive for me).
I say I am lost for words but can I please see a manager, explaining I am the sole carer for an 88-year-old disabled woman with a heart condition and no vaccination. I plead for an exception. She is kind but firm: I am not eligible but she will fetch a manager.
I explain again to the manager, who takes one look at my contract and immediately confirms that I AM eligible. There IS a rule change, but it relates to people claiming carer's allowance, not to those with a formal contract to care for someone.
So I get that some confusion is inevitable in an operation of this scale, but clearly there are people out there who legitimately booked appointments as carers on the basis of carers' allowance and the rules have changed over the weekend. It will be devastating when they arrive.
People on carers' allowance (a pittance paid only to those with no other income, ie broadly low-income groups) should not be put through this, especially while fit 70s are now piling into centres in their millions. I hope the rules can be relaxed for those with appointments.
And while I'm grateful for getting dose #1, I'm gutted that the housebound and other very vulnerable groups are still waiting in Sussex and prob elsewhere. Appointments are finally being made for the next few weeks but how many people will catch Covid from carers in the meantime?
I am also gutted for any carers who have booked an appointment in good faith and will queue up only to be turned away. This programme is of course amazing and a privilege but is delivering its own injustices in the name of mass figures.
Were you aware of this rule change @alzheimerssoc @DisabilityGovUK @DisRightsUK @Caringforcarer6 ?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 🇪🇺 🇬🇧 Eagleowl Shipping Services(soz no ships)

🇪🇺 🇬🇧 Eagleowl Shipping Services(soz no ships) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @eagleowl123

29 Jan
I didn't think after Brexit I could feel any more disgusted by my country. The failure to vaccinate housebound people with disabilities while 8 million other people get theirs has achieved it. In both cases the majority are happy as they perceive it to work for them. #SelfishGene
Following on from the appalling early scandal whereby hospital patients with Covid were knowingly moved to nursing homes, with catastrophic results, we now have a second scandal whereby the less vulnerable are leapfrogging the most vulnerable.
So the sprightly 70-somethings who are choosing to go to supermarkets are getting vaccinated, while people with disabilities who have no choice about very close contact with carers may have to wait at least another month.
Read 5 tweets
4 Apr 20
@andwarn @KarenOMahony5 Having done a lot of reading of sensible articles, the answer seems to be:
1. They will offer a certain level of protection from certain aspects (eg maybe from bigger droplets but not necessarily from the finest "aerosol" transmission which is thought to be happening.
@andwarn @KarenOMahony5 2. They may be as effective at changing behaviour eg encouraging social distancing, signalling that this is to be taken seriiously.
3. They have to be worn "intelligently" ie don't fiddle with them, don't touch the outsides afterwards, don't assume they give you magic immunity.
@andwarn @KarenOMahony5 4. Some fabrics are better than others - closely woven cotton I think is best.
5. There seems to be an overall benefit, eg a level of protection in higher-risk areas eg shops, places with no ventilation, but are not an alternative to everything else eg handwashing, distancing etc
Read 4 tweets
12 Jan 19
Am in tears. Neighbours have tried to call the police over a "suspicious black chap" with a white woman at a property in the village. This was me and my partner, leaving our home, putting the neighbour's bin away, before going for a run. F***ing racism f***ing Brexit.
Just for the record. Black men are residents, neighbours and fellow citizens, yes even in villages. It is not a crime to leave your home to go for a run. Nor to put your neighbour's bin away, as he does every week. These are not crimes. I've never been so angry or upset.
Three days ago he was sitting in an A&E cubicle with a white friend after we'd rushed her in with suspected meningitis. He was challenged as a possible intruder. Years of racist shit. It's getting worse. FFS Britain.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!