John Hayward Profile picture
1 Feb, 13 tweets, 3 min read
The pandemic highlighted how decades of pushing for socialism have utterly destroyed our ability to measure costs against benefits and evaluate risk. We're down to people refusing to take vaccines until they're 100% effective and demands for lockdown until we have 0% coronavirus.
This neurotic hysteria is a result of pushing people to demand 100% safety and security in all things, and convincing them only bigger maternal government can make the safety blanket bigger. The law of diminishing returns means each 1% increase in "security" now costs billions.
Socialism thrives by frightening people out of taking risks and convincing them to demand Mommy Government take care of all their "grievances." By definition, the idea is to "socialize" all costs. The Big Lie is tricking people into thinking socializing costs makes them vanish.
Thus you have the absurd spectacle of socialists constantly promising "free" goodies, or insisting that if people pay a single penny for anything the socialists deem "vital," their "rights" have been trampled and their "access" to those necessary goods has been blocked.
The fraudulent ideal of socialism is that everyone pays equally for goods that everyone must have. The ugly reality is that some are looted so that others get a "free" ride. Either way, success for the socialists requires tricking the public into demanding total "security."
The Wuhan coronavirus came crashing down on a society conditioned for generations to demand absolute security, zero risk, even the most fanciful grievances redressed by the Mommy State. They were taught to be terrified of risk and to ignore the cost of "virtuous" programs.
The hysteria of the past year is the unsurprising result of a REAL crisis descending upon people conditioned to collapse into nervous heaps and scream for Mommy Government over countless imaginary, exaggerated, and minuscule "crises." We were ALREADY in constant panic.
Hysteria is really all about losing the ability to evaluate risk and measure costs against benefits. Hysterics see inevitable doom in tiny risks and demand safety at all costs. "If it saves just one life..." is an idiotic slogan deployed by socialists YEARS before the pandemic.
You talk hysterical people down by calmly getting them to see the truth of their situation and evaluate it reasonably. You get them to understand that refusing to take any action is more dangerous than doing nothing because every action seems too perilous.
In short, hysteria disables our ability to evaluate costs and risk. The return to sanity involves regaining our sense of paying reasonable costs for rational benefits, and taking important actions even if success and safety are not 100% guaranteed.
The hysteria of 2020 is what happens when a society deliberately bred and trained to become a panicked herd, kept in a constant state of terror and grievance by political opportunists, gets hit by a genuine crisis. No one remembers how to evaluate risk and cost rationally.
For generations, we've been trained by ambitious socialists that asking about the cost of their programs is EVIL. We've been taught to demand perfect guarantees, total assurances, ideal outcomes, and zero costs - and to surrender more of our money and freedom to get them.
A society that thinks that way is utterly unprepared to deal with a menace like the coronavirus. Rational planning demands an ability to measure costs vs. benefits that has been deemed absolutely heretical by our political class because it would compromise our faith in THEM. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Hayward

John Hayward Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Doc_0

3 Feb
I thought often during the latter Trump years about the contrast with Barack Obama's "stray voltage" strategy, which involved saying provocative and often flatly untrue things to prompt discussion of Obama's preferred topics for political gain.
The idea behind stray voltage was that injecting your preferred narratives into national discussion was the goal. As long as people were talking about your issue - even if they were calling you out for lying about it - you could profit politically.
The prime example was Obama and his administration endlessly repeating easily debunked falsehoods about the "pay gap" and women earning 70 cents on the dollar compared to men. It wasn't true, and it was EASY to debunk, but they just kept repeating it like parrots.
Read 16 tweets
2 Feb
The thing that really broke up the conservative movement was the surrender on social issues - the "fiscally conservative but socially liberal" intellectual fad - followed by the utter and total collapse of fiscal discipline in U.S. government.
It sounds like a simple, almost tautological diagnosis in retrospect - our thought leaders gave up on half of their ideology, then gave up on the other half - but it wasn't obvious to those thought leaders at the time, and the order in which the surrenders occurred was important.
Throwing in the towel on social issues stripped the conservative movement of populist energy. Politicians and pundits threw away the ability to speak passionately about subjects of elemental importance to normal people. They gave up red-blooded debate to talk about red ink.
Read 15 tweets
29 Jan
This is a really interesting point, especially as we watch the return of Barack Obama's Ineptocracy under Joe Biden. Obama and his people were highly credentialed nincompoops who brought us one insanely expensive disaster after another.
Here's another example from yesterday: no, Janet Yellen isn't going to recuse herself from the GameStop thing just because she was lavishly paid off by Robinhood's owner. She's an "expert." Who are YOU to question her integrity?

The obsession with credentials is one of the biggest problems we face, combined with the centralization of power, corruption, elite arrogance, and the Western world's embrace of authoritarianism. Bubbled elites are claiming more power over our lives and demanding less resistance.
Read 12 tweets
26 Jan
Xi Jinping's speech at Davos boiled down to: The world has no choice but to do business with China, and if you want to do business with China, you need to stop criticizing our tyranny and questioning our lies about the coronavirus.

breitbart.com/national-secur…
Xi's address to the World Economic Forum will serve as well as any other moment for historians to mark the beginning of the Authoritarian Era. He said nothing new, but he restated the narratives and demands of Chinese fascism from a post-pandemic position of aggressive strength.
For the first time, Xi spoke to a world that is beginning to accept the tenets of authoritarianism, thanks to the incredible political and economic damage from China's coronavirus. China's ideals have become as viral as Covid-19.
Read 13 tweets
25 Jan
For most of my lifetime, people on the Left focused on the perils of Big Business while ignoring, or actively embracing, the menace of Big Government. A great deal of the Right did the reverse. Both Bigs are perilous, especially when they fuse into a combined threat to liberty.
The growth of both government and corporate titans was inevitable, especially after a century of industrial and technological revolutions. Technology makes it possible to have larger endeavors, both public and private. Economies of scale bring enormous benefits.
Industrial advancements meant government had to get bigger to handle even its most basic responsibilities, like national defense. The World Wars erased the model of a tiny central government handling a few key elements of defense. Every war became a clash of industrial titans.
Read 14 tweets
20 Jan
The worldwide movement toward "limited authoritarianism," already well under way but dramatically accelerated by the coronavirus, is driven by the elite consensus that ordinary people cannot be trusted with so much freedom.
"Limited authoritarianism" is the best phrase for what the elite have in mind. They have decided that a growing list of topics are simply off the table. Consensus has been reached, and no further input from voters will be permitted on those topics.
This is a natural consequence of the progressive ideology, which is inherently authoritarian, although it peddles itself in the early stage with lots of jibber-jabber freedom and liberty. Progressives by definition believe that the growth of the State can never be reversed.
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!