Look, I'm all for the UK joining the CPTPP.

It won't be the first FTA signed for political/strategic reasons without serious, tangible economic benefits. Trade deals are signed for a number of different reasons. It's normal.

/1
It's also normal for countries to try to create hype around trade negotiations - especially is they are literally desperate for some good news which with the double impact of covid and Brexit we currently are.

/2
Finally, it is also absolutely normal for FTAs to have a limited impact on GDP.

The overall potential (in most cases wishful thinking) is one thing, utilisation rates of trade deals often tell a different story.

/3
And that's still fine. Indirect benefits of FTAs are important too.

Where I draw the line is making impossible and unfounded claims about a prospective deal without in-depth analysis and number to back it up.

/4
Why? Cause that doesn't end very well.

As seen over the last 4.5 years and the current "teething" problems, as well as all the emergency founds the Gov now needs to offered shell-shocked businesses that were told they will get an over ready deal.

/5
So how about we do things differently with the CPTPP?

If the Gov claims CPTPP will create high-value jobs across the UK can we have some numbers, please? Modelling? Analysis?

/6
I'm almost more OK with meaningless statements such as "build back a better global trading system". That's fine. You're not getting anyone's expectations up with that one.

It creates some interest and momentum for the process which is what it's meant to do.

/7
People that follow FTAs, trade, Brexit etc will know that benefits of joining CPTPP, especially since we have bilateral FTAs with the majority of members, will be limited to some specific areas, rules etc. They will be important for the affected sectors, companies etc

/8
And together with the strategic goals, that's enough of a reason to go for it.

So let's just not overhype this one and not overpromise (again) cause the level of disappointment and frustration in the private sector is already high and likely to grow in months to come.

/9
That said - I look forward to the negotiations and their successful conclusion as well as exploring the potential further liberalisation under the CPTPP.

Great news and best of luck.

/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Anna Jerzewska

Dr Anna Jerzewska Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AnnaJerzewska

26 Jan
I fully appreciate that hearing that DIT advises UK companies to set up in the EU is shocking. It really isn't good PR given that one of the goals of Brexit was to avoid red tape.

But there really isn't anything particularly unusual about it.

Think of it this way

/1
A UK company is exporting to Vietnam and the supply chain becomes more complicated over time, more integrated. The company no longer only exports but moves parts back and forth, perhaps has a sister company in Vietnam that it purchases from but still invoices via the UK

/2
That part of the business is big enough to be crucial for the company. At some point, it will consider setting up a presence in Vietnam to avoid non-tariff measures and simplify the process.

/3
Read 5 tweets
24 Jan
Love being quoted just based on my tweets (especially the sarcastic ones). Thanks Express.

So let's unpack this. Should companies be setting shop in the EU?

/1 Image
Some- yes.

It's all about what the company does, where it brings goods from, what happens to the goods in the UK and where they're sold to.

/2
In some cases, you'd have double or triple duties after bringing goods into the UK. Rules or origin might be an issue (Percy Pigs). And then there is VAT and cases where you might need a representative in the EU country and loss of triangulation.

/3
Read 6 tweets
21 Jan
Approaching the end of Week 3. This is what I'm seeing on the ground.

Everything is picking up. A number of companies had enough stock to last them through Jan.

They are now preparing to start importing/exporting for the first time

/1
Some of them are still asking very basic questions and do not understand what it means to be an importer/ exporter. Not to mention all the forms etc.

Some still struggling to find a customs broker or only now starting to look for one (!!!)

/2
No conversations with current hauliers, brokers re capacity, no conversations with suppliers/clients re division of responsibility.

Bit late for everything now.

/3
Read 6 tweets
20 Jan
Just been talking to someone about long term effects of Brexit and it got me thinking about all these industries that are at a standstill at the moment, in shock over the new red tape.

/1
While it’s true that many industries are at a standstill and are struggling to export now, that’s just the beginning.

/2
Border issues will eventually get sorted. IT systems will work (more or less) and we’ll get the hang of these new formalities.

And at that point, many companies will realise that the extra red tape and these extra costs are not going away.

/3
Read 8 tweets
20 Jan
Reminder - we talked about transit in the context of alternative border arrangements and moving checks away from the border.

Now we can see why that was not a good idea

/1
Transit is a customs procedure. As all procedures it comes with additional requirements, providing a guarantee for each movement is one of them.

While transit is common (no pun intended) we are not set up to use it on this scale.

/2
Other problems with transit systems were reported over the weekend leading to some difficult conversations with stakeholders.

/3
Read 4 tweets
19 Jan
Short 🧵on my key point from today's webinar on rules of origin.

Great questions from 1.3k (🤯) ppl in the audience and always such a pleasure to listen to @MichaelGasiorek and @pwrighting share their expertise on trade and origin.

/1
We hear so much about rules of origin but it's important to understand they are not just one thing - rather a set of requirements.

I always talk about them in terms of 3 different layers of origin requirements.

/2
Layer 1⃣ - product-specific rules.

You need to make sure your product meets rules for that particular product (based on your commodity code) under the specific trade agreement. There are different rules:

✅for different products
✅under each/most agreements.

/3
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!