Phillip Kline Profile picture
Feb 1, 2021 6 tweets 1 min read Read on X
Last night the New York Times placed an article with a number of glaring flaws about the irregularities in the 2020 presidential election. Image
A recent NYT article refers to officials ‘bending the rules to make mail voting easier during the pandemic.’

This is a gross distortion intended to downplay what happened.

Election officials did not ‘bend the rules,’ they were breaking the law in a systematic fashion.
When election officials broke the law they also undermined the integrity of the election.
As described in numerous lawsuits, election officials & secretaries of state unilaterally set aside ballot security laws passed by their state legislatures, including signature-matching requirements, voter ID requirements and statutory deadlines for absentee and mail-in ballots.
Local election officials accepted over $300 Million in private funding from Zuckerberg, allowing private interests to dictate the manner in which local officials managed the election, violating the state law. It's stunning that this doesn’t cause the NYT to raise its eyebrows.
In their article on election integrity, the NYT completely ignored the unprecedented infusion of private funding, totaling over $400 M, which intensive investigations have determined was both unnecessary and illegal.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Phillip Kline

Phillip Kline Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PhillDKline

Jan 11, 2023
Trump v. Biden document differences. 1. Trump, # of docs on varied topics consistent with chaotic nature of leaving office. Biden, small # of docs on same or similar topics reveal specific intent. 2. Trump could declassify as President. Biden as VP could not.
3. Trump docs at home. Biden docs at private office, left vacant for years. 4. Trump Russian collusion proven false. Hunter Biden- China collusion evidence becoming difficult to ignore. 5. Trump: No evidence of any foriegn influence at his home. Biden think tank linked to China.
6. Trump and National Archives in negotiations when DOJ raided home. Biden claims docs discovered right before mid-terms but did not reveal until recently. 7. Trump, DOJ likely to file charges to prove a point and to punish a political opponent. Biden, DOJ Trump appointee...
Read 4 tweets
Dec 16, 2022
If Hobbs is successful in dismissing Lake's suit it only proves 1) election officials can violate procedure and law without accountability 2) partisan private vendors can still be used to conduct core government functions 3) legislators & others have failed to learn from 2020...
and 4) many of those who claimed to fix the 2020 problems are wrong! Exs: GA claimed to ban private money, but endorsed it. Many states still allow consolidated count centers and interim ballot handling facilities enabling evasion of transparency laws....
Much of election management can still be outsourced in secretive prrivate contracts. Electronic access to pollbooks can still be granted for partisan advantage. Standing to sue is still limited. Ballots and voters are treated differently within a state. State laws requiring ...
Read 5 tweets
Jul 21, 2022
It’s good to see a sincere bipartisan effort to address the ambiguity and structure of the electoral college act that resulted in confusion in the 2016 and 2020 elections and continuing arguments relating to manner in which we select our nation’s leader.
A key provision of the proposal, however, appears to run head long into the plenary power of the state legislatures of each state to determine the manner of appointment of presidential electors under Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution.
The proposal states that Congress will only recognize electors certified by the Governor. The power of the Governor, however, to certify an election result is dependent on a state legislature granting that power.
Read 4 tweets
May 20, 2022
Indiana AG and epidemiologists: predominant disinformationon COVID is the CDC and Surgeon General - reducing citizen trust! One of the primary promoters of disinformation on the election is also the feds thru the insistent claim the election was perfect & resisting any review.
This despite dramatic breaks in ballot chain of custody, improper use of $100s of millions of private monies in leftist election offices, and ballot mules. In 2020 America was kicked out of the counting room, and billionaires allowed in!
Read 4 tweets
Sep 1, 2021
Biden top 10: 1) let allies riot and takeover American cities in 2020, call rioters with whom you disagree inserrectionists in 2021. 2) don't trust Americans to exercise freedom w responsibility and protect the vulnerable ratherand support, quarantine the healthy.
3) claiming silencing speech w Big Tech Alliance really protects free speech. 4) put barbed wire around the capitol to keep Americans away and open the southern border. 5) have unvaccinated Americans treated as noncitizens w limited rights and don't screen foreigners for Covid.
6) turn energy independence into China dependence. 7) have Garland threaten state governors and legislators who disagree 8) support shuddering small business and increasing IRS audits on small business while keeping big Corp box stores open shifting wealth to allies and Big Tech.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 10, 2021
Election audits are crucial to understanding the 2020 election, but they will not – indeed, they cannot – be the final word. Audits were not designed to provide a smoking gun, and it’s reckless and counterproductive to suggest otherwise.
Members of both sides of the political aisle, have created false and exaggerated expectations for Americans across the political spectrum when it comes to audits.
Audits can, and hopefully will, reveal abnormalities, but only good investigations can explain those abnormalities and tell us whether laws were broken and whether fraud took place.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(