Last night the New York Times placed an article with a number of glaring flaws about the irregularities in the 2020 presidential election. 
A recent NYT article refers to officials ‘bending the rules to make mail voting easier during the pandemic.’
This is a gross distortion intended to downplay what happened.
Election officials did not ‘bend the rules,’ they were breaking the law in a systematic fashion.
This is a gross distortion intended to downplay what happened.
Election officials did not ‘bend the rules,’ they were breaking the law in a systematic fashion.
When election officials broke the law they also undermined the integrity of the election.
As described in numerous lawsuits, election officials & secretaries of state unilaterally set aside ballot security laws passed by their state legislatures, including signature-matching requirements, voter ID requirements and statutory deadlines for absentee and mail-in ballots.
Local election officials accepted over $300 Million in private funding from Zuckerberg, allowing private interests to dictate the manner in which local officials managed the election, violating the state law. It's stunning that this doesn’t cause the NYT to raise its eyebrows.
In their article on election integrity, the NYT completely ignored the unprecedented infusion of private funding, totaling over $400 M, which intensive investigations have determined was both unnecessary and illegal.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
