I'm posting these, they are linked through time inbetween social medias. Thrown back to the boards. Look to Start Comm. Should come up with this.
3005 (hours and minutes)
1805, looks like this. Note the past article, the future rally.
1083, though I did a bit on this a while back. The link reffed is dead. It is for the Earth Sat. Program (ESP) Jan 17, 1956. Note the drop says "old to new". Also the times are close to 12 hour deltas in their stamps. Again just a note. cia.gov/readingroom/do…
I will note on the previous. If you consider this the "article/newspaper ref. It is in the past of our other drop that told us to look for such. I also did a previous thread from another angle. Leave that here as well.
The seconds variation was done backwards, thus 108,300 seconds is read 003,801, I used 3801 for a drop. Well we have a mention of a rally? In the future of our indicated drop. Even the Airforce has stated significance. Pretty plainly (no pun intented).
Now why is this relevant? Look at the timestamp. 15:20:[07]? Lets go back to the very first drop tweet posted. My sketch looks like this. Just numerical differences is 12hours15minutes. It's actual is 11:45. Three look like this side by side.
So here's those three in a side by side. Now I used logic to arrive here. We got that trust POTUS with those three "o7"s. That just strikes me as an anomaly of sorts. Again just another re-read.
As always I urge user to do their own re-reads and find simalrities on their own accord. Any errors in math or transposition just shoot me a DM. @ThreadReaderApp, please unroll.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I do times in between tweets. Looking at Northern Command for this one. The first one is from yesterday at 15:12. The other from today at 18:49. Differences are 27hours37minutes, 1,657 minutes, 99,420 seconds. Drops, 2737, 1657, 2499 (secs ran backward).
2737 is a short one. Makes me think of a certain hot topic though.
1657 looks like this. Always good to implore for ones self.
I do times in between tweets, then plug the difference back into the drops. Looking at CQBrown for this one. These two, today at 13:34, then yesterday at 19:57. Diffs are such; 17hours37minutes, 1057 minutes, 63,420seconds (ran backwards). Drops 1737, 1057, 2436.
1737 is pretty plain. If the boards are more then meets the eye, what do we do with it? I have an idea(I'll illustrate), We will come back to it when the other face value times are done.
1057. We can see RC is a feature. Some face value talk about trafficking The FBI is mentioned, I'll leave this snip here as well. FBI in LA yesterday, can't help but notice the FBI tweet is at 20:04. (Sorry the drop snip is broken up)
I do times inbetween tweets. Take the difference, then plug it back into the drops. Looking to Army Central for this one. Think, type, post. At 18:44 today. Subtracted from I think it's ther first of the day. At 12:50 today.
The difference looks like this. So 554, 354, 2124.
I do times in between tweets. Looking at a local one for me, NG in NH. So they had one at 10:09am today, then in comparison to yesterday at 13:37. Take the time differences plug it back into the boards. So 2032, 1232, 2937 (the seconds backwards).
2032, I will note this, the time stamp is 31 minutes off the seconds comparison tweet.
I do times inbetween tweets, plug them back into the boards. Looking to US Army Central for this one. So 8:27 this morning, subtracted from 23rd, at 20:37 time in between looks like the 3rd snip. So drops, 3550, 2150, 129, 129|0|.
3550. Syntax strikes me with the drop "27_yes" something like that.
2150, that 1-99 mark reminds me of this 9/11 ref, we also have the Patriot Day, and FREEDOM mark? Dunno just strikes me.
I do times in between tweets, and honestly I'm a little upset leaving CQBrown out to dry for the day! Look at this bad larry with that "pepe pose" on the ladder. Time stamps as follows, 'leadership'change the basis for comparison. 9:04 this morning, 13:15 on the 22nd.
The difference looks like this. So 1949, 1189, then ran backwards is 4317, not that there isn't other paths you can't take with this.
1949. Now it looks pretty plain but I marked that image up for a reason. Strikes me as a simalrity, maybe it's just me.