After Galwan Valley incident, out of shame at lack of in-depth understanding of China, its past & designs, I started learning Mandarin Chinese.
Finished all freely/cheaply available courses in Coursera & Udemy in the last 6 months. At around HSK level 5 now.
Have been studying it like a small kid. Waking up at 5:30 every day, spending 5-6 hours a day writing and reading, finishing one notebook after the other, using different colors for hanzi, pinyin and English.
One aspect of the learning was to become able to read and understand economic, military and diplomatic articles in mandarin. Finding good sources itself took sometime. But totally worth it.
It was surprising to be able to read and at at least partially understand 习主席关于经济和国际关系的讲话.
Sun Tzu said
"知彼知己,百戰不殆;不知彼而知己,一勝一負;不知彼,不知己,每戰必殆"
But,
无论是敌人还是朋友,我们都需要研究我们的邻居.
As a civilisation and as a country, we cannot afford to not know the history, design and desires of an aggressive power in our neighbourhood. Knowing them and predicting their actions is our best bet.
A prudent Government should encourage independent scholarship on China.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Now if you too are violent at home, you’ll say it is domestic, hence private.
But if you’re confident of own conduct, you’ll say it is violence & hence public.”
My UPSC interview answer in 2011 on whether India should comment on Sri Lanka.
Then they asked but isn’t it our principle to not interfere in the internal matters of other countries?
I replied that principle can come from a position of weakness or a position of strength.
First one is from position of weakness while the second from position of strength.
Then they asked me if we comment on SL, will it not allow others to comment on us?
I answered that as a country we have grown to a stage where if we do human rights violation, our Govt should be more worried about our own institutions & organizations than any external comments.
Indiscriminate sale of PSUs is not just about sale of national assets, but also an over-smart way to side-step reservation and social justice.
Not making a blanket case for or against privatisation. But the clandestine way in which social justice component of public recruitment is taken away, lateral entries, single vacancy advt & indiscriminate sale of PSUs is something that needs to be out in the open & discussed.
A simple question to ask the Govt in parliament would be
1. Recruitment breakup of the PSUs over the last 10-20 years and current vacancy breakup.
2. Whether the Govt can promise that a similar pattern in recruitment is going to be kept after privatisation of the said PSUs.
In 2013, petrol price was ~₹80 even when crude was ~$100.
If opposition can pick one petrol pump in a city & give 'UPA era discount' to people filling petrol there, it may demonstrate how much this Govt is squeezing them.
PS: The insane increase in central excise duty via @jamewils
PPS: How personal income tax rates have also increased during the same time via @tradingeco.
The squeeze is real. Like a dhritarashtra aalinganam.
COVID: More than 85% of respondents lost their jobs or saw their income decreased. - MOTN
Should have been the headline.
Not whether respondents are still happy in an abusive relationship with the PM. 1/n
More percentage of people in Italy find their Govt did a good job. More people in Japan find their Govt did a bad job than in Italy or in India. And if we compare actual impact of Covid on these countries, we will realise how far disconnected it is from these ratings. 2/n
Whether you are happy with Govt is an irrelevant question as long as people don’t connect own hardships to failures of Govt.
If 85% lost job/income & still consider Govt performance good, it is evident that these two are in two unrelated planes. Zero expectations from Govt. 3/n
Bratton and van de Walle described some regimes as "neopatrimonial" with key characteristics being clientelism, strong presidents, and the use of state resources for political legitimation. They also don't allow any political competition.
I know this might seem irrelevant. But unlike a US which has strong institutions, where a journalist can stand up & counter the President in a PC, we have weak institutions and even weaker individuals manning them. Identifying the phase we are in might point us to solutions too.
Sad part is that even our academia is not independent or bold enough to analyse current events from theoretical-historical framework.
How many IIMs/economic schools published their analysis on the impact of demonetisation on our economy?
A few simple questions to @ECISVEEP and @SpokespersonECI on the current EVM-VVPAT design and the vulnerabilities therein.
Hoping that all political parties will also raise these questions to ECI & demand an answer in the interest of both transparency and national security. 1/n
1. Is the EVM-VVPAT connected (networked) to any external device after the elections are announced?
More specifically, is the EVM-VVPAT connected to any external device after candidates are finalised and booth allocation of EVMs is done? 2/n
- If yes, then what are those external devices and what is the network protocol used?
- If no, then how and at what stage information regarding candidate names and symbols are uploaded to EVM-VVPAT? 3/n