I've just had an email from our lovely research services people suggesting that I might repurpose an existing grant application to apply for an @ERC_Research Starting or Consolidator grant. Unfortunately, ERC uses "years since PhD" as its metric of experience, so I'm ineligible.
I'm *just* in the eligibility window for Consolidator (it's up to 12 years post-PhD), but my application won't be competitive due to lack of track-record.
It's so frustrating that grants that are explicitly intended to help people get established in academia often exclude those who've had a career in industry. UKRI, at least, is better about this.
It would be an easy thing for ERC to change in order to encourage mobility between academia and other sectors - which can only be a good thing, right?
For anyone else in this position:
Eligible grants include: all UKRI early career grants/fellowships; 1851 Fellowships; Royal Society fellowships.
Ineligible: Royal Academy of Engineering fellowship; British Academy postdoctoral fellowship; Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"An Early Career Scientist (ECS) is a student, a PhD candidate, or a practising scientist who received their highest certificate (e.g. BSc, MSc or PhD) within the past seven years. The seven-year period can be extended to allow for periods when..."
"... the scientist was not working in science because of, but not limited to, caring and/or parental responsibilities, disability, personal illness, community obligations or national service". This is a big improvement over the previous definition which only exempted maternity.
One of the things about being a radio communications engineer is that I look at antennas (aerials) in the same way that birdwatchers look at birds: noticing the everyday but also recognising the unusual. So, a spotters’ guide to some unusual antennas on this house in Cambridge:
Let’s start with the run of the mill: the blackbirds of the antenna world. Two Sky mini dishes. Useful fact: all Sky dishes point roughly south-east (as that’s where the satellite is), so you can use them to get your bearings if you need to.
Equally mundane, up here on the chimney pot, is an ordinary TV aerial. In Cambridge these point towards Madingley (NW of the city) because that’s where there’s a convenient small hill with the transmitter on it.
A short thread on the importance of lighting for looking good in videos - this setup was for an interview over videochat.
Since most videoconferencing is effectively bad television, let’s use techniques from TV to make things better… let’s go!
Here’s what I look like just the available light in the room.
I’m using the built-in camera on my 2015 MacBook Pro.
Note the grainy colour-speckle on the ceiling? That means there’s not enough light - we’re seeing noise from the camera automatically adding gain to the image.
Okay, so we need to add more light. In TV world, we first add a “key light”, which is placed at 30-45 degrees off-angle from the subject’s face.
In this case, I used a small desk lamp.
See how my face is bright on one side and there’s a shadow cast by my nose? That’s good.