I'm so angry that when I was a kid, all I knew about Dolly Parton was the size of her chest. And her hair color, I guess. Imagine taking all that talent and decency and goodness and organization -Imagination Library!!!- and reducing it, dismissively, to jokes about her appearance
I don't even know where that impression came from - movies? comedians? other kids? -but I remember it. And yeah, she hadn't done everything then that she has now, but that kind of proves my point: you focus on appearance, you miss what someone has done AND what they're capable of
AND she had already written Jolene and I Will Always Love You among many others. Why wasn't her main reputation, the first thing you learned about her, that of a major songwriter like Dylan or Paul Simon or ..?

(I know why)
this makes me furious because it's such a clear example of what our society is CONSTANTLY doing to women, people of color, fat people, disabled people, anyone who doesn't fit the image that we're sold of what power, cool, artist, genius, look like.
and because those people who don't fit get dismissed, we only see that narrow segment of appearances representing those categories, that image is reinforced over and over again. I hope it's starting to change, a little.
When I was growing up I never thought my face looked intelligent. I am very intelligent, and I knew it, but every representation of intelligence I saw on a screen was either male or sharp-nosed, high-cheekboned, perfect tendrils of hair.
How hard do you have to push this shit so a kid thinks you can see intelligence in the shape of a face??
That's how hard they push it. And usually in the same stories that claim their "moral" is "don't judge by appearances."
Can you imagine "writing" that book? Can you imagine publishing it? Buying it?
Meanwhile this woman is over here writing incredible songs, teaching a nation of kids to read, and turning down medals of freedom because that's how much class she has.
Think of some comemierda making money off that book next time someone tries to tell you we live in a meritocracy
I'm getting a lot of replies along the spectrum from "she said it too!" to "that was part of how she controlled her image". I'm not disparaging her appearance or her choice of it. I'm angry that was ALL I saw, that I missed out on the rest. She may have played into that look but
1) she did not take it to that gross place.
2) she may have allowed or encouraged a focus on her appearance, but I can't believe she intended it to erase her musical talent.
3) she was responding to a culture and an industry with those priorities.
And again, I don't remember exactly where I got this impression. I'm not pointing to one person being evil in this way. But that very fact - and that a lot of replies agree with me - shows how widespread this erasure of everything but appearance was.
The phrase "in on the joke" keeps coming up in my mentions, and that is not the point. Of course she knew what they were laughing about. Whether she played it up as a strategy is not the point. Whether she liked being thought of as sexy is not the point (I hope she did/does!)
The point is that other people made that the only thing they talked about or wrote about in regards to this marvelous multitalented woman. The point is they thought that was not just acceptable, but appropriate. The point is society agreed, and rewarded some of them for it.
Regardless of whether that's wrong in principle (it is), it also had the effect of obscuring this person's cultural achievements. I missed out. Judging from my mentions, others did too. That's what happens when your cultural gatekeepers are comemierdas.
More power to her if she laughed at the jokes or made them herself. It was smart and it was survival. I've definitely done the same, esp when I was younger. But. Those aren't actually jokes.
Someone quoted earlier the 1 about not being offended by dumb blonde jokes because she's neither. Great retort, no shade to her, but that's not a joke. It's a statement of fact. It only becomes "funny" in the context of a society where everyone agrees to pretend blondes are silly
It's not true. Everyone knows it's not true. And none of those "jokes" are even pretend-funny unless you pretend it's true.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with DOCTORA Malka Older

DOCTORA Malka Older Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @m_older

1 Feb
so...is there anyone out there who actually likes it when you're watching a fun caper-type show and they introduce a character and transparently build up the relationship/backstory so there's an emotional impact when said character is unnecessarily killed off?
yes this is le subtweet ಠ_ಠ
but I'm genuinely curious because shows do this ALL the time & it's always a downer for me, not just to lose the character but because they tip their hand so hard narratively. You *know* it's about to happen, which makes it boring. it feels like an admission that only MC matters
Read 6 tweets
1 Feb
I quit my Sherlock Holmes reread when the racism got to be too much (it was getting pretty repetitive by that point, too) but 1 thing that struck me was the constant emphasis on individuals who are the ONLY ONES IN THE WORLD who can deal with whatever
Obviously this is often Sherlock, but not always, and anyway it's a really irritating example of the continuing emphasis on a single person being the only possible way to solve a problem, an excuse for that person to martyr themself or otherwise demonstrate unhealthy feats (eg
not sleeping, not eating, working non-stop, etc). narratively it's a lazy sort of stakes-building, but through #NarrativeDisorder it translates into real-world thinking way too often, and it's a problem.
Read 11 tweets
31 Jan
I had to take some time to think about this. Thanks Cory for the prompt! I initially felt a bit squinky about tagging people to talk about privacy but I think @astepanovich @drkarenlord @marthawells1 might be interested and have interesting things to say, but no obligation!
Privacy is vitally important. Emotions, sense of self, and creativity all need sheltered places to grow and/or space to work themselves out where initial efforts don't (or minimally) affect others.
Those are, incidentally, all things that we don't put much emphasis on in a lot of societies these days, but they are important and in and of themselves should demonstrate that privacy is valuable.
Read 10 tweets
19 Jan
I really hope that the inauguration will be free from disruption and violence. If it is, there will be hot takes of the "See? The threat was exaggerated" variety. As a disaster expert, I can tell you that is not a useful framing.
Reactions like that after swine flu etc are part of why we were so terribly underprepared for covid: "the low-/medium-/high-probability disaster didn't happen this time therefore it won't happen" is not solid reasoning.
And of course the preparedness itself affects how bad the impacts of the event are (which is part of why emergency management/disaster risk reduction is such a thankless job: if it goes well, no one notices). In this case that's particularly true: heavy deterrence approach.
Read 6 tweets
19 Jan
another crime at Disney's door
Read 5 tweets
19 Jan
I just got my contributor's copy of Constelación #1 and I'm SO EXCITED!! constelacionmagazine.com
I've already raved about the cover illustration by @JohnPicacio but look at it! so gorgeous! Image
It means so much to me to have a story translated into Spanish. I have tías and tíos and primas who have never read my writing because they don't read English, and I'm so so so happy to have a published version I can send them. It's an amazing feeling.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!