"President Trump’s conduct must be declared unacceptable in the clearest and most unequivocal terms. This is not a partisan matter. His actions directly threatened the very foundation on which all other political debates and disagreements unfold." judiciary.house.gov/news/documents…
"No enemy—foreign or domestic—had ever obstructed Congress’s counting of the votes. No President had ever refused to accept an election result or defied the lawful processes for resolving electoral disputes. Until President Trump." bit.ly/3j90Uby
"Surveying the tense crowd before him, President Trump whipped it into a frenzy, [and] aimed them straight at the Capitol, declaring: “'You’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong.'" bit.ly/3j90Uby
"Incited by President Trump, his mob attacked the Capitol. This assault unfolded live on television before a horrified nation. But President Trump did not take swift action to stop the violence." bit.ly/3j90Uby
"While Vice President Pence and Congress fled, and while Capitol Police officers battled insurrectionists, President Trump was reportedly “delighted” by the mayhem he had unleashed, because it was preventing Congress from affirming his election loss." bit.ly/3j90Uby
"This dereliction of duty—this failure to take charge of a decisive security response and to quell the riotous mob— persisted late into the day." bit.ly/3j90Uby
"In fact, when Congressional leaders begged President Trump to send help, ... he instead renewed his attacks on the Vice President and focused on lobbying Senators to challenge the election results." bit.ly/3j90Uby
"President Trump endangered our Republic and inflicted deep and lasting wounds on our Nation. His conduct resulted in more than five deaths and many more injuries. The Capitol was defiled. The line of succession was imperiled." bit.ly/3j90Uby
"President Trump’s incitement of insurrection requires his conviction and disqualification from future federal officeholding. This is not a case where elections alone are a sufficient safeguard against future abuse; ...." bit.ly/3j90Uby
"... it is the electoral process itself that President Trump attacked and that must be protected from him and anyone else who would seek to mimic his behavior." bit.ly/3j90Uby
"Indeed, it is difficult to imagine a case that more clearly evokes the reasons why the Framers wrote a disqualification power into the Constitution." bit.ly/3j90Uby
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
No. It's unquestionably moot. The cases did not seek retrospective relief, such as damages, but rather only prospective relief—declarations and and injunctions addressing future conduct. But he can't violate the emoluments clause any more, since he's no longer president.
So not only was the Court right on vacating and dismissing as moot, it actually had no other choice, since the federal courts under Article III only have jurisdiction to decide live cases and controversies.
Nixon got re-elected, too, and won the popular vote twice. The second time, he won by 23.2%, and won the electoral college 520-17—an actual landslide. In contrast, Trump lost re-election, and lost the popular vote twice, both times by substantial margins.
So really, comparing Trump to Nixon is horribly unfair to Nixon.
“I was reminded of Hannah Arendt describing the trial of Adolf Eichmann. ‘The trouble,’ she wrote, ‘was precisely that so many were like him, and that the many were neither perverted nor sadistic, that they were, and still are, terribly and terrifyingly normal.’”
“She described this as the “banality of evil”—the willingness of otherwise ordinary people to do extraordinarily evil things.
But the traitors in that violent mob did not act on their own.” democracydocket.com/2021/01/the-da…
“The events of January 6 began much earlier, seeded and spurred on by a deranged president and many of the nation’s most powerful Republican politicians.” democracydocket.com/2021/01/the-da…
He riled his supporters up for weeks with mendacious attacks on the election and our democracy. He promoted the gathering in DC for weeks, and said they would be “wild.” He instigated the attack by telling people to march on the Capitol. .
He reveled in the attack for hours. He praised the rioters and said he loved them. He continued to lie about the election.
And only after his White House counsel and others emphasized to him his potential criminal liability, and only after calls for his removal reached a fever pitch, did he pretend to condemn the violence that he had fomented and praised.
This isn't surprising. He's a narcissistic psychopath. He praised the rioters because he views them as vindicating him, thus providing him with narcissistic supply. He also views them as an instrument of revenge, and as a psychopath (and a sadist), revels in that.
This fits perfectly the psychological profile that countless mental-health professionals identified even before Trump was elected.
In any event, what matters now is that he's desperate, cornered, and more dangerous than ever. What's at stake for him goes beyond assuagement of his narcissistic ego; he understands that once he is forced to leave office, he can be subjected to criminal prosecution.