On to asylum processing, the part I'm most interested in. First, the DHS Secretary and the CDC Director are required to "promptly begin consultation and planning" with NGOs "to develop policies and procedures for safe and orderly processing of asylum claims."

Nothing concrete.
Next, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the AG, the HHS Director, and the CDC Director, "shall promptly begin taking steps to reinstate the safe and orderly reception and processing of asylum seekers."
As part of that review, the HHS Secretary and CDC Director, along with the DHS Secretary, are directed to "promptly review and determine whether termination, rescission, or modification" is necessary for the Title 42 Process, as well as the underlying Trump-era CDC order.
Next, the DHS Secretary is directed to "promptly review and determine whether to terminate or modify the program known as the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP)," as well as "promptly consider a phased strategy for the safe and orderly entry" of those still waiting in Mexico.
Third, the DHS Secretary and the AG are directed to "promptly review and determine whether to rescind" the Asylum Transit Ban, which went into effect two weeks ago in the form of a final rule.
Fourth, the Attorney General and the DHS Secretary are directed to "promptly review and determine whether to rescind" the Asylum Cooperative Agreements regulation and the Secretary of State is directed to "promptly consider" whether to fully withdraw from the agreements.
🎊Fifth, we get the first concrete action as part of the asylum section, which is an order to the DHS Secretary to immediate "halt implementing" the PACR and HARP programs (which have been suspended since March 2020, but I'll take it anyway!).
🎊Sixth, we get a bunch of Trump-era polices ended by EO, including:

- Trump's 2017 Border Security EO
- Trump's Asylum Ban 1.0 Proclamations.
- Multiple "presidential memoranda" signed by Trump on border issues signed in 2018-2019.
Seventh, the DHS Secretary is ordered to "promptly take steps to rescind any agency memoranda or guidance issued in reliance on or in furtherance of any directive revoked" by the section included the previous tweet—which could have sweeping effects that we'll see play out.
Next, we move on to expedited removal! The EO calls for a full 120-day review of all expedited removal processing at the border.

But more importantly, the DHS Secretary is required to promptly consider whether to "modify, revoke, or rescind" expanded expedited removal!
Finally, the EO ends by ordering the AG and the DHS Secretary to, within 180 days "conduct a comprehensive examination of current rules, regulations, precedential decisions, and internal guidelines" on DV & gang-based asylum, and to issue a PSG regulation within 270 days!🎊
To recap, there is almost nothing concrete in the EO, with the exception of rescinding multiple proclamations and presidential memoranda signed by Trump.

Long story short? This sets the ball rolling for a lot of cabinet-level immigration actions coming in the next weeks/months.
Here is the full Border Security EO, which was just posted to the White House website. whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aaron Reichlin-Melnick

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ReichlinMelnick

2 Feb
On to the Legal Immigration Executive Order (thanks @DLind for emailing).

It begins by affirming that "Our Nation is enriched socially and economically by the presence of immigrants, and we celebrate with them as they take the important step of becoming United States citizens."
The first portion of the legal immigration executive order calls for the creation of a Task Force of New Americans to be run out of the White House Domestic Policy Council, with will "coordinate the Federal Government's efforts to welcome and support immigrants."
Next, the EO calls for a full review by the AG and the Secretaries of DHS & State Dep't of "existing regulations, orders, guidance documents, policies, and any other similar agency actions that may be inconsistent" with the welcoming policy of the Biden administration.
Read 12 tweets
2 Feb
We have the first executive order on border issues (emailed out)! It begins by declaring that "Securing our borders does not require us to ignore the humanity of those who seek to cross them. The opposite is true."

I strongly agree with that!
Here's the first operative language, calling for the preparation of a "Root Causes Strategy" and a "Collaborative Management Strategy" to be prepared with the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, Secretary of State, DHS Secretary, the AG, and others.
The "Root Causes Strategy" is designed to "identify and prioritize actions to address the underlying factors leading to migration in the region and ensure coherence of United States Government positions."

There is a long list of things that the Strategy must take into account.
Read 4 tweets
29 Jan
Just jumped into listening to the Tipton status hearing in the Texas case and the Texas AG just said something wildly incorrect, that all 14,000 people held in ICE detention would be released—but that's just completely wrong. It only applies to those with final orders!
Tipton, admitting his lack of knowledge on immigration law, asks a series of questions about detention that suggests he completely buys into Texas's argument that anyone with a criminal record is per se dangerous. But they served their time! If they were a citizen they'd be out.
Kirschner pushing back on Tipton and the AG's focus on detention, making clear that the case is about "removal," not detention. He asks Tipton to lay out his questions fully so they can answer them.
Read 15 tweets
28 Jan
🔥We just published a brand new report, authored by @Ingrid_Eagly and @stevenshafer, proving that the overwhelming majority of immigrants show up for their court hearings.

The report puts to rest years of false narratives about immigrants missing court.

americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/measu…
Our new report also reveals that when immigrants *do* miss court, it's often through no fault of their own.

15% of all orders of removal issued from 2008-2018 were later overturned—and that number will rise over time.

Read it here: americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/measu…
Orders of removal for missing court can only be overturned:
- If the government failed to provide notice, or
- Within 180 days, if a person missed court due to "exceptional circumstances."

The fact that 15-20% are later overturned suggests massive failures to provide notice.
Read 4 tweets
26 Jan
Absolutely ridiculous. This is going to cause HUGE instability inside DHS at a moment where it needs stability.

Now we'll get to see whether the Supreme Court has the same level of extreme deference to DHS that it had under Trump.
Judge Tipton made clear in his decision that he was NOT ruling on the basis of Texas's "contract" with DHS, but instead ruled solely on the Administrative Procedures Act claims.

Very important caveat to Judge Tipton's order: it does NOT apply to the "Interim Civil Enforcement Guidelines" (the new priorities) in Section B of the memorandum from Wednesday night. It applies ONLY to the moratorium itself in Section C.
Read 8 tweets
25 Jan
The DOJ filed its response last night, making 6 arguments, if you count "are you kidding me" as a distinct argument.

- MOU is unenforceable
- No waiver of sovereign immunity
- Discretionary decisions are nonreviewable
- No standing
- No irreparable harm courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Thanks to @DLind for flagging that DOJ just responded to Texas's submission of a Tucker Carlson piece claiming ICE had been ordered to release everyone.

They point out that a small set of releases occurred because of a lawsuit unrelated to the moratorium.
courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
And we're off, hearing is beginning now in a very crowded Zoom where I see a lot of Immigration Twitter has tuned in.

Appearing today are:

- Will Thompson for Texas AG's office (argued on Friday)
- Daniel Hu, DOJ Civil Chief
- Adam Kirschner from local DOJ (argued on Friday).
Read 30 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!