Both American political parties are now committed to protectionism. No significant political constituency favors free trade. Protectionism is not a better idea because Biden endorses it. Le Monde rightly points this out-- lemonde.fr/idees/article/…
while overlooking the even greater cost to EU taxpayers of its own protectionism. (Although in fairness, they do link the document that spells it out plainly.)
My own views on protectionism have changed as a result of the pandemic; I now believe some industries need to be protected--medical supplies and pharmaceuticals, for example. We need to repatriate industries such that shortfalls can be used as a boot on our neck.
But the economic case for free trade otherwise remains as strong as it ever was.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is an extremely interesting document. What's everyone's guess about the author? Might it be Pottinger? Anyone familiar enough with his thought to hazard a guess? politico.com/news/magazine/…
The idea that Russia can be peeled off from China is delusional. Apart from that, this seems well-considered strategic advice--*except* that the US is in no position to execute a patient strategy over many administrations. For that, you need two functional political parties--
both of which are prepared to pursue a consistent foreign policy in which partisan politics stop at the water's edge. The GOP seems determined to drag the US into a low-level civil war, which will make it impossible for the US to project power this way over the coming decades.
@keithmfitz, we were discussing the phenomenon I discuss in this newsletter the other day--the emptying out of American political speech and its replacement with duckspeak.
This is what looks so ominous in retrospect. Though Americans tend to make a theistic or natural-law case for liberal democracy--we speak of rights "endowed by our creator"--in reality, the power of this has long rested upon pragmatism:
Here are a few more things I've written in the past few years about partisanship, anti-cosmopolitanism, and the New Caesarism. I was just looking through the archives, and I thought these held up well. claireberlinski.substack.com/p/partisanship…
I just came across an article I wrote in 2019 about the populist instinct to celebrate provincialism and ignorance as "authentically American" traits while intimating that curiosity about the world beyond America--and education--are unpatriotic. claireberlinski.substack.com/p/i-hereby-ris…
"It’s fine, even patriotic, not to know the difference between Russia and Ukraine or to care. Indeed, if you know anything at all about this conflict, you must not be a real American—because real Americans, authentic Americans are proudly ignorant."
"Ignorance and indifference are to be celebrated as authentic American values. It’s a form of blackmail, too, this esteem of ignorance. Carlson is inviting anyone who can find Ukraine on a map to exhibit (justified) contempt for him."
He does know better. But he's using Paris as a metonym for "foreign, cunning, sophisticated city-slicker trickery designed to bamboozle the good plain folks of Pittsburgh." He clearly believes this will work, rhetorically. That's dismaying--
both because it's stupid, obviously, but because it's personal. I live in Paris. I'm a US citizen. Am I excluded from the community of real and authentic Americans because I live in Paris? I suspect that's just what he means.
He's courting the votes of people who reject the idea of "Paris." What does "Paris" signify to most Americans? Art, literature, architecture, culture, fashion, wine. A list of associated words:
Fauci tells us what we already know: Trump was too stupid to understand the difference between science and pseudoscience. I don't fault Trump for this. He didn't elect himself president. I fault everything about our political system and culture that resulted in his presidency--
And everyone around him who watched this, every day, as the pandemic consumed the country; everyone who surely *was* intelligent enough to understand what Fauci was saying to him, but went along with this anyway.
Pence, Pompeo, the whole cabinet. How did Ben Carson, a highly-trained physician, think it was okay to keep working for him and keep quiet about his *inability* to understand the biggest emergency the US has faced since the Second World War?