There are a lot of great academics doing super important research about Big Tech, content moderation, and freedom of expression. Their perspectives are important.

But journalists also need to talk to ACTIVISTS, who have actual lived experience using social media for organizing.
Your perspective on things like disinformation & deplatforming change dramatically when you have actually experienced getting deplatformed or algorithmically suppressed or incorrectly flagged as spam just as a campaign is going viral. Even if it's fixed later, the damage is done.
Your average sex worker or Palestine activist knows more about Big Tech power and content moderation than pretty much anyone with a PHD. Sorry not sorry
(Also just to be clear lots of sex workers and Palestine activists do have PhDs so not trying to create a dichotomy) just saying people's lived experiences are at least as important to their formal education, especially when it comes to complex issues like content moderation

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Evan Greer

Evan Greer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @evan_greer

4 Feb
Before they take it down, here's the video Amazon circulated internally to roll out what amounts to the largest expansion of corporate surveillance in human history: using artificial intelligence enabled cameras on their fleet of thousands of delivery vans theverge.com/2021/2/3/22265…
Had to split it into 3 parts. Here's part 2. These cameras will not only monitor Amazon drivers but also constantly record video to the front and both sides of the vehicle, and analyze it with AI. Amazon says openly they plan to use it to "investigate" things like "package theft"
The AI claims to monitor for things like "distracted driving." We know systems like this that track eye movements exhibit systemic racial bias. We also know Amazon uses "productivity monitoring" software so invasive workers have gotten UTIs cuz they can't take bathroom breaks
Read 8 tweets
2 Feb
My dear friend, mentor, and touring partner of many years, @annefeeney is in the ICU battling COVID. Anne is a living legend of the movement. A radical hellraiser who Utah Phillips called the "greatest labor singer in North America." She's a fighter. Please send some love her way
Anne was the first woman to become the president of a Musicians Union local in the US. She faced violent attacks from right wing union members for being a feminist and openly socialist. Her song "Have You Been to Jail for Justice" has been sung by activists around the world.
.@annefeeney found me at a @PeoplesMusicNet gathering when I was 18 or 19 and offered to take me on tour. She didn't know how young I was and was freaked out when she realized I couldn't drive the rental car. She called my parents to make sure they knew where i was 😂
Read 9 tweets
31 Jan
This entire article could just as easily be about iMessage or WhatsApp. Fearmongering like this is about encrypted messaging apps is going to put vulnerable people in danger. It’s depressing to see so-called progressives making the same arguments as cops businessinsider.com/signal-extremi…
The "experts" referred to in the headline are not experts on encryption or tech policy or global human rights. Activists in the US are so unbelievably myopic and naval gazing. Ppl need to stop throwing nonsense like this around. It's going to get people killed.
I've been trying to meet people where they're at and acknowledge folks are scared about the rise in right wing violence. But i am just fucking done with people ignoring the concerns of the most vulnerable and calling for "solutions" that will kill the ppl hate groups want to kill
Read 4 tweets
9 Jan
i can already tell this is going to be exhausting.

no, tech platforms banning accounts does not violate the 1st Amendment. In fact, it's protected by the 1st Amendment.

yes, Big Tech monopoly power and content moderation decisions have profound implications for free expression
The fact that Apple and Google have so much control over what software you can load onto your phones is in itself a problem. I honestly don't know what the right thing to do is now that they have the power they have but I do know the world would be better if they didn't have it.
And I know that if our conversations about content moderation remained focused on individual moderation decisions concerning high profile accounts, rather than systemic / structural problems and the broader impact on marginalized voices, things are just gonna keep getting worse
Read 5 tweets
6 Jan
IMPORTANT: In the coming weeks expect Democrats to push respond to this moment by pushing for:

-more surveillance
-more policing
-more Internet censorship

This is the exact opposite of what we need to do. We need to address this problem at its root: systemic racism & injustice
The mainstream pundit narrative will focus almost exclusively on the tactics used by those who stormed the capitol. The tactics are not the point. There is nothing inherently wrong with militant protest, the problem is weaponized white supremacy sparking violence.
You'll hear self-avowed progressives call for things like more funding for the FBI to "monitor domestic extremist groups." In their imagination this will be used to target Proud Boys etc. In reality it will just deepen the surveillance state that harms Black & brown communities
Read 10 tweets
29 Dec 20
For the last fucking time Section 230 is not a "special legal protection afforded to technology companies"

It applies to literally every website. Including the comments section of The Hill, for example. It also protects you from getting sued for retweeting or forwarding an email
If Section 230 were repealed entirely, it would throw the Internet into chaos. It would also ironically solidify the monopoly power of the companies everyone is mad at: Facebook and Google. They have the armies of lawyers to figure out how to navigate a world without 230
Repealing Section 230 would lead to MORE censorship on the Internet, not less. If you don't like the way Twitter and Facebook do content moderation now, wait til they're making those decisions based on whether they think your post might catch them an expensive lawsuit
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!