This starts in five minutes, so you just have time to register and tune in. Really excited to learn more about the semifinalists in @USDOT's Inclusive Design Challenge!
Kathy Klinich of @UMTRI is explaining their work on a universal docking interface geometry for wheelchairs and an automated seatbelt system, aimed at allowing wheelchair users to use an autonomous vehicle without any human assistance. Such a cool and important project! 🦾🦾🦾
AV developer @May_Mobility's @tara_a_lanigan says accessibility is a core value for the company, which is why they teamed up with @UMTRI to pilot implementation of their wheelchair anchoring system in their autonomous shuttles as part of the USDOT Inclusive Design Challenge.
We're getting some personal insight into the importance of securing a wheelchair from @KentKeyser of @UnitedSpinal, who points out that a powered chair can weigh twice as much as the user. A very real mobility challenge.
Kent goes on to point out that AVs aren't just about offering mobility, but personal autonomy: the ability to not just get where you're going, but to do so on your own schedule and not having to book paratransit 24 hours in advance. Our blog post on this: medium.com/pave-campaign/…
Great point by @tara_a_lanigan: the universal wheelchair anchoring system from @UMTRI is being implemented first into @May_Mobility's AVs but it's relevant to non-autonomous transportation as well. The driver would no longer need to do the anchoring work, improving efficiency.
Both Kathy Klinich of @UMTRI and @KentKeyser have pointed out that the work to make AVs accessible is important for the disabled community, but its value will only grow as the "grey wave" of aging baby boomers experiences more mobility challenges.
Our excellent moderator @TabithaColter wraps up another excellent @PAVECampaign weekly virtual panel by noting that @USDOT is soliciting comments on its strategic plan on accessible transportation. You can find that here: beta.regulations.gov/document/DOT-O…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with E.W. Niedermeyer

E.W. Niedermeyer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Tweetermeyer

4 Feb
Here's a fun mental exercise: if you did want to run a self-driving car scam starting in 2016, how would you have made it different from Tesla's "Full Self-Driving"?

It's genuinely difficult to think of a better way to pull that off than exactly what Tesla has done.
Start with the most important consideration: the marks. Do you target VCs? Sure, they are hype-susceptible and fallible but they also have access to experts and lawyers. No, you would target the public, who know nothing.

Incidentally, only one AV developer takes consumer cash.
What's the pitch? Well, everyone else is pitching Level 4 robotaxis because the tech is pricy, so not that. Sell the dream: SAE Level 5 autonomy, but in a car that you can afford to own yourself. Better yet, it can be a robotaxi that works for you and pays for itself!
Read 10 tweets
2 Feb
I needed some comedy today, and boy did this do the trick
Musk doesn't materially address any of the meaningful manufacturing questions/issues and Munro quickly stops even hinting at them and lobs softballs, but apparently this comes across as a deep, substantive and focused talk about manufacturing to lots of folks🤷‍♂️
"The real obstacle to Full Self-Driving is state-to-state variations in road lane markings" sure is a take.
Read 7 tweets
2 Feb
Great job of spelling things out here by @Tim_Stevens. In my entirely personal opinion, showing this yoke publicly as a future vehicle option reeks of the sense of regulatory impunity Tesla has enjoyed in the US for years now.
Even where regulatory bodies are not particularly zealous or capable, most industries cultivate ~the appearance~ of deep respect for their regulator. That's certainly the norm in the auto industry. Breaking the rules is one thing, flouting the rules is very much another.
Musk likes to "pre-announce" things well before they're ready. New Tesla models. Self-Driving options. Funding rounds. LBOs. In 2009, he claimed DOE would soon disburse loans Tesla hadn't fully applied for. Here's a more recent and famous example 👇
Read 6 tweets
1 Feb
Wow, this is huge. AI and the cloud have more short-term transformative potential for automotive product development, manufacturing and supply chain than AVs. Interesting consumer-facing moves here too, with unique Android-based "digital experiences" and an app ecosystem.
In LUDICROUS I talk about the fact that an app ecosystem is more fundamental to the smartphone revolution than the hardware form factor or UI.

Here's Elon Musk telling Steve Jurvetson in 2009 that "we've got people like writing apps for the car". 🤷‍♂️

The first "smartphone on wheels" will not be the first car with a giant screen or a smartphone-inspired UI, but a car that has a robust and meaningful ecosystem of useful and popular third party apps. That opportunity is still out there!
Read 4 tweets
22 Jan
Well, that explains Musk's sudden interest in carbon capture! 😂
I'm so old, I remember when @montana_skeptic's oil/gas investments (part of a diversified family office portfolio he managed for his employer) was touted as proof positive that he was an utterly untrustworthy shill for planet-destroying fossil fuels. 🤔 electrek.co/2018/07/24/tes…
Like the Sandy Munro thing, the most galling part of this is not Musk's/Munro's behavior, but the shameless hypocrisy of his fanbase.

It just goes to show that, behind the facade of smarmy self-righteousness, the culture emanating from Tesla is utterly ruthless and unprincipled
Read 8 tweets
22 Jan
Waymo CEO @johnkrafcik says Tesla is "absolutely not a competitor" to his autonomous drive technology company.

I talk to a lot of AV developers on a regular basis, and I can't think of a single one who does think of Tesla as a competitor. manager-magazin.de/unternehmen/au…
The response that "Teslas can self-drive everywhere and Waymo can't" based on FSD beta footage is laughable. In case you haven't seen this, here is a playlist of Waymo driving 1,000 miles across California without interventions... in 2009! youtube.com/playlist?list=…
If some long drives without interventions meant a company was on the cusp of real driverless L5 autonomy, Waymo would have got there a long time ago. It's just not the case: the more "nines" of reliability you stack up, the harder it gets. That's why AVs are later than predicted.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!