also look at what TANF actually does, getting rid of it while massively expanding and reforming an anti-poverty program to be far more effective is no great loss
in one sense this is embezzlement and fraud being described, but it's not like the money is being taken away from needy families, mississippi takes advantage of the block grant set up to reject viruallly all applicants and instead spends it on whatever
The block grant flexibility frees up states whose government are ideologically opposed to capital-w Welfare but have funding issues to spend it on "Public and private pre-school, child welfare, and college scholarships" cbpp.org/blog/louisiana…
the degree to which tanf *by design* has withered way into irrelevance and ineffectiveness can't be overstated. yes, other programs have expanded to fill the gap (namely SNAP) but cash welfare, as we know it or not, is basically dead

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matthew Zeitlin

Matthew Zeitlin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MattZeitlin

3 Feb
Ah, well, that’s one substack I won’t be writing
The political sustainability of means tested programs is underrated but that sustainability may be due to the burdens they place on recipients and the low participation rates those burdens engender
People often say “just raise taxes to pay for the bigger program,” well, like how popular are broad based tax hikes? The ACA is janky and stingy because it had to be paid with a pretty narrow tax
Read 7 tweets
6 Oct 19
Lots of Never Trumpism (especially that National Review issue) was premised on 1. Trump losing and 2. If he won, not governing as a conservative. So when he won and let Heritage do domestic policy and the Federalist Society do judges, the entire project became obsolete
So, like, it would be really weird for a sitting republican legislator to be anti trump, let alone a conservative pundit. He’s the leader of their movement and party and is mostly doing stuff they agree with. Ethic of responsibility!
And so it’s not surprising that consistent never trumpers either overwhelmingly care about one policy issue that they disagree with trump about (Kristol, Boot) or were already heterodox pre-Trump (Douthat, Forum)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!