Join this webinar (happening now) from @NASEM_DBASSE on reporting on COVID. From @vishplus: "Journalism has been a saving grace" during the pandemic. His surveys show people who read traditional media are well informed about vaccines & eager to get them nationalacademies.org/event/02-05-20…
The @BostonGlobe has been gathering data on racial disparities of the pandemic and identifying problems and inequities in vaccine distribution -- drawing attention more than anyone else, @vishplus says
From James Druckman & his team's survey: Lots of people who are hesitant don't know that vaccines were extensively tested. Reporters should emphasize the size and clear findings from clinical trials to increase vaccine uptake
From @_AllisonMathews: Showing people where they can find trustworthy resources builds trust. Data visualizations, presenting accessible info, helps especially if people have lower health literacy levels. Short video clips useful. Need more in Spanish.
From @_AllisonMathews: Show researchers who are Black, Latinx or Indigenous. Show the power of community health workers for addressing health equity. Lots of story ideas for reporters in this webinar, stories that haven't been told sufficiently.
From Stephanie Fryberg: Indigenous perspective has been relatively ignored in general and during the pandemic. Seeing huge social effects among Native people & they're more likely to know people who have died. Big motivation for vaccination: protect elders and community members
From Stephanie Fryberg: Everyone has that one "Native nerd" in their family. That's who they'll listen to on the data about vaccines.
Q for Stephanie Fryberg: Best way to engage with Native American? Best frames for stories? SF: There are lots of great stories. Show sources of resilience rather than deficit perspective. Don't treat us as primitive or childlike. Capture diversity, Native scholars & scientists
Stephanie Fryberg: There's a lot of confusion about vaccines: microchips, will we get the placebo. We're trying to build up knowledge and trust, deal with historical mistrust and trauma. Need people to understand that everybody has to get vaccinated to protect elders.
Crucial point from @_AllisonMathews: Lived experience, not some genetic factor, is why pandemic has been so dangerous for Black people. Racial difference is about systematic, structural differences.
What have we learned from pandemic? @scheufele says science is faster than ever, under more scrutiny. Has led to coverage of single studies & preprints. Conservative media use retractions or changing understanding to say you can't trust science.
Problem with scarcity: People want whatever they can't get their hands on. Is there a positive effect of the very unfortunate shortage of vaccines? -- idea from @scheufele
From @rrichardh When there's a public health emergency, science journalists wear two hats: usual watchdog role, but also messengers of public health. Don't abandon usual tactics, but it's worth being repetitive and conveying messages. Especially when officials muzzled.
Always convey the idea: This is the best we know right now. @rrichardh who had to listen to Trump's briefings in real time & his job was to immediately deal with all the misinformation on the fly. Important to say what you do and don't know.
From @marynmck Remember how much the public health system has been hollowed out in the US -- years of underfunding, lost more than 50,000 public health workers, even more when the pandemic started and they were overworked and harassed.
There was an information vacuum -- and that's where misinformation flows. -- @marynmck
We've failed to communicate that COVID is a natural disaster. The response always breaks down in the last mile -- where things break, and where most people are needed. We've failed to help people understand the last-mile fragility. By @marynmck
From @scheufele: In the last week of the Trump administration when he was deplatformed, we saw what journalism could have been like if we hadn't been covering his every tweet.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Anchoring bias" is a huge problem with the coronavirus pandemic -- people tend to remember the first things they learn about a new subject & have a hard time updating that with new info (thread) scientificamerican.com/article/nine-i… via @sciam
The virus doesn't kill only people in China or in Italy or on cruise ships or in nursing homes. It can kill absolutely anybody. It's not just those other people's problem. It's everybody's problem.
It's not just in sneezes or coughs. Contaminated surfaces aren't the main problem. This coronavirus is In! The! Air!, spread by people who aren't necessarily sick and who are just singing or talking or breathing.
I’ve been a judge for a lot of writing awards. The deliberations are always strictly confidential, and I can’t say anything about specific contests, but I can tell you a bit about how the process works from a judge’s perspective, and what you can do to be more competitive.
But first, if you’ve ever won a contest: Congratulations! Your work was brilliant, the judges were brilliant, and awards are a fair and accurate recognition of the best writing in your field.
Second, if you’ve ever been a finalist or gotten an honorable mention: Congratulations! Your work was also brilliant! It can sting to find out you were so close to winning an award but didn’t get it (been there, felt that), but it’s still a big honor.
I'm an editor, so a lot of what I do is cut or change words. These are some of the mistakes and misuses I see all the time & how to fix them. This thread is not to shame or subtweet anybody -- I learned many of these mistakes by making them myself. Please add your own favorites!
"Enormity" means something really bad, not something really big.
"Japanese/Brazilian/Finnish/Australian researchers discovered..." Science is the most international endeavor in human history. Any team that makes a discovery worth covering almost certainly includes people who aren't citizens, so instead say: "Researchers in Japan/Brazil/etc."
We had an important discussion at #wcsj2019 about how to protect your sources, your data, and yourself. Here’s a thread of highlights from the session with lots of digital security advice & links. wcsj2019.eu/Sessions/Data-…
Here are some of the ways people can share information confidentially with The @WashingtonPost Note that number five is: Drop it in the mail, from a mailbox. This was a theme throughout the session: Don't use technology if you can avoid it. washingtonpost.com/anonymous-news…
I put a pond in my back yard about 10 years ago, and it has given the best return on investment in units of pure joy of anything I've ever done. Have you ever considered a water feature? Here's my experience in case it's helpful. A thread.
So there are a lot of expenses up front: a plastic liner to keep the water from draining out of the pit, a pump, a filter, lots of tubing, paving stones, plants, pots to keep the plants in, fish, beneficial bacteria water treatments, etc.
The pump sucks water from the bottom of the pond and into the filter, which spits clean water out into a stream that runs back into the pond. This keeps the water circulating and inhibits mosquitoes and algae.
I’ve been talking with an early-career person who is looking to change jobs, and it reminded me just how much you don’t know when you’re starting out. Here’s a thread of advice on how to look for a new job & what to do while you’re waiting. Please add to it if you can.
It’s a lot easier to find a new job if you have a job. It’s not fair and it’s not efficient, but a lot of hiring managers have this bias. Also, if you’re applying for a job in the same field, your expertise in your current job is one of the things that makes you a good catch.
You may think you are underpaid, underappreciated, under-challenged, or doing way more than your job description—and you are probably right. But unless your current management is abusive or unethical, or if you’re literally sick from it, stick it out in until you find a new job.