The performative left who are now demanding a $25 minimum wage demonstrate why they will be forever marginalized, powerless, and without influence. Winning builds your movement. Rather than take the $15 win, they present it as a loss, demanding more.
If you can never deliver anything for your movement, you will have no movement, you have a club. If when you are handed a victory such as an increase in minimum wage, refusing to celebrate that win leaves you without any victories.
If you have no victories, there is no reason for people to work with you because you deliver nothing. Take the win, celebrate it, and move on to a new demand.
Of course, they did nothing to secure the $15 MW, so it's fine they present themselves as losers.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
They clap as if in defiance, and laugh at their enemies behind their hands, with the shrill laughter of children. They want to be right, not to do right. They feel no obligation to be part of the main tide of life, .
and if that meant any degree of pollution they would prefer to divert themselves from it and form a standing pool of purity. … I looked into my own heart and I knew that I was not innocent. Often I wonder whether I would be able to suffer for my principles if the need came,
and it strikes me as a matter of the highest importance. That should not be so. I should ask myself with far greater urgency whether I have done everything possible to carry those principles into effect,
I want to make one thing perfectly clear to those who make their living providing political news and analyses.
Insurrectionists do not get to define "Unity."
We have frequently been told "Elections have consequences" while McConnell pushed confirmations of subpar and outright outrageous judicial nominees, including Judiciary voting Clotheshanger Barrett out of committee without a quorum.
Any objection to Trump's reactionary and retrograde agenda was met with derision best summed up by the GOP trademarked phrase, "Fuck your feelings."
He looked at the inaction of the Hoover Administration in its response to the Great Depression and recognized that a political party unwilling to act in the face of widespread despair and dispossession would never act to protect the rights of Black people.
Good question. I think a lot of people are out of work with too much time and too little power and without an understanding that there are other avenues to power and change than protest.
Protests are an effective tactic if they are connected to a demand in place and time or in response to a specific event. Protests for the sake of protest become a joke. For example, it used to be a regular thing for this group of enviros to march through downtown on Fridays
It was incredibly ineffective and unimportant. We'd hear drumming and think, there they go again. They didn't make a demand, they didn't go to the federal building to demand something on timber policy or anything, just marched and drummed through downtown
OK, she has a slightly more complex argument, but she doesn't know what neoliberal means. She erases the wide disagreements between Democrats and Republicans, pretending they are all one uber-party united against her cohort of the only enlightened people.
She is contemptuous of democracy because her ideology is unpopular and a vote loser. They cannot gain power through democracy, so they see to degrade it.
Do not preach to Black people about there being only one race-the human race. While scientifically true, it's is culturally, politically, and economically false. Race may not exist but racism does. The "see no color" lie is an abstention from humanity
Yes, race is a "social construct" and we are actors in society and saying it's just a construct while doing nothing to deconstruct it, is cowardice at best and malignant in its ends.
Using the language of anti-racism to abnegate your duty to reject white supremacy and dismantle racism is about as offensively self-indulgent and white supremacist as you can get.