Is Qanon morphing into a religion right before our very eyes?
At a minimum, we are witnessing a perfect storm-like convergence of numerous features of modern society that have created a fertile ground for conspiratorial delusions. 1/ religiondispatches.org/in-the-name-of…
These features unsurprisingly run parallel to both Trumpism and Qanon.....and include: celebrity hero-worship, reality TV, weaponization of technology, narcissism, victimhood, a neurotransmitter called dopamine, religious conditioning,…2/
…….a post-truth mantra that entitles people to “find your (their) truth”....
(excerpt from something I wrote about political confirmation bias)…..3/
….. and, if Stanford professor, Robert Sopalsky, is correct, possibly even schizotypal disorder. 4/
I’ve written a number of threads/articles that touch on these factors separately. I’ll try to weave them together here to address the “Qanon as a religion” premise. As alluded to above, 5/
…Robert Sapolsky submits an interesting theory about schizotypal personality disorder (“loose associations, meta-magical thinking”) as factor in early religion formation. 6a/
Basically, Sapolsky suggests that “prophets” who were sufficiently disordered enough to believe/claim to have a unique relationship with, or understanding of, a deity……could convince a tribe of people to follow them and their beliefs. 6b/
Well, Qanon dogma is littered with loose associations (to reality) & meta-magical thinking…..where millions of people hero-worship a clearly disordered, “chosen one” tribal leader (Trump), & an amorphous, false (fictional) prophet that dispenses conspiratorial delusion: “Q”. 7/
In previous work, I’ve analyzed the gravitational pull of conspiracy theories. The link to the thread is here, but I’ve unrolled it below: 8/
When people don’t know what to believe, or feel like they can’t believe anything, they will attach their beliefs to bias-confirming narratives…even if those narratives are illogical. 9/
I’ve used a “circuit breaker” analogy to explain why some people revert to not just their previous position when confronted with potentially moderating information about both sides of an issue, but to an even more extreme position than they held before hearing both side. 10/
Here's something I wrote a few years ago when theorizing about a study that focused on the effect that new information has on pre-existing opinions: 11/
(Begin quoted thread)
"Although conventional wisdom might expect that rationally thinking people would have their opinions moderated into a middle-ground position by the convincing evidence provided for both sides of the argument,….12/
….the unpredicted effect of being exposed to scientific evidence that supported and contradicted both positions actually resulted in people holding a more polarized, more extreme position than what they held prior to hearing the two rounds of evidence. 13/
Perhaps their evolving extremist positions had less to do with having been exposed to both sides of the issue, and more to do with the volume of information overwhelming them, resulting in a “circuit breaker”-like effect where the human mind shuts down or “trips”,…14/
…..and reverts not just back to their initial position on the issue, but to a more extreme version of it as if needing to protect itself from a future, similar, potentially damaging informational (power) “surge”. 15/
The tendency of a person to gravitate towards a more extreme polarized position on an issue may be the result of a self-preservational instinct to avoid a self-concept shattering realization and acceptance of their ignorance on a particular topic.…16/
When considering this study, the bombardment of information of both sides of a particular issue may have failed to moderate the participants’ views on the issue...17/
…because being exposed to an overwhelming amount of evidence may have created an information overload, which then threatened to pierce their Dunning-Kruger veil of ignorance. 18/
Rather than accept their own intellectual limitations, the participants may have reflexively and compulsively doubled-down on their original position as a form of ignorance repression. 19/
Basically, people are choosing to remain confidently ignorant and assertive, rather than to become educated, informed, and measured in their views." (end quoted thread) 20/
One of things that may be happening with conspiracy theory fanaticism, is that when confronted with information on both sides of an issue, for some people, when that psychological circuit “breaks”,…..21/
….instead of reverting back to a previously held position…..or even a more extreme version of it (as happened in the study)….….they instead detach from any semblance of reality. 22/
Basically, when confronted w/contradicting information that causes them to not know what to believe….they’re compelled to believe anything, regardless of how absurd it may be….especially when that absurdity is “highly entertaining…and intoxicatingly addictive” (see below). 23/
Several years ago, I wrote about potential physiological factors of tribalism:
(Begin quoted thread)
“…the political polarization/partisanship problem actually goes even much deeper because research has shown there may be a physiological component:…24/
…..fMRI scans were used to show that neuroanatomical regions that are associated with physically painful experiences. exhibit increased activity when people experience social exclusion or social separation. 25/
These findings indicate that it can literally become a *painful* experience when people disagree or speak out against groups of which they consider themselves to be members. This would seem to indicate that…26/
…there are physiological components at play that cause people to prefer to be comfortably wrong (incorrect/uninformed), rather than uncomfortably right (correct/informed)…, 27/
…when being right or correct would put them in contradiction with a group with whom they share an identity, or if being right or correct would threaten their group membership. 28/
If motivation or incentive for pain avoidance exists, it not only could conceivably create an aversion to objectivity or moderation, but it would incentivize groupthink, ‘collective narcissism’, etc.”
Similar to speaking out against a group that people derive their identity from.....there may be a pain avoidance component involved with aversions to refuting a conspiracy theory, or speaking out against a belief the rest of the group believes/propagates. 30/
Another factor may be that by believing in conspiracy theories, people allow themselves to embrace two cognitively dissonant ideas: 31/
Conspiracy theories satiate the conspiracy theorist’s narcissism by allowing them to believe that they are special, unique, smarter than everyone else, and hold membership in an exclusive “club” of “the knowing”….32/
…..while also justifying their grievance/resentment/victimhood because the conspiracy explains why, despite all their narcissistic grandiosity (special/unique/smarter than everyone else), they may have underachieved in life. 33/
Basically, conspiracy theories are often a cognitive dissonance-reconciling narrative that allow people to believe that they are special (narcissism), even if they’ve done nothing special in their life (victimhood…someone kept me down).” 34/
Circling back to the “highly entertaining….intoxicatingly addictive” reference above, that quote was included from another article/thread that examined the Religious Right’s susceptibility to conspiracy theories, which I’ll address below, but first some context. 35/
The “entertainment” factor is not only a major component of the Qanon obsession, but it’s also a major factor with the degradation of society. I’ve analyzed the entertainment (and reality tv) factor here…..: 36/
(begin quoted thread)
“Unfortunately, similar to hiding a dog's medication in a peanut butter treat, society often needs its information embedded in entertainment, or stated inflammatorily by an “entertaining” Right Wing “Shock Jock”. As a result,…37/
…40% of the country chooses to consume “information” from a network (FOX) that manufactures “entertaining” political fiction/conspiracy theories…and uses attention-grabbing visual graphics/sound effects to suck viewers into the drama of the political theatre they produce. 38/
Entertainment has become such a primary pursuit in people’s lives that celebrity culture now influences our politics to the point where “celebrity” has now become synonymous with “authority” as evidenced by the fact that we have a reality TV president…”.
(end quoted thread) 39/
….And I’ve analyzed the effect of society's increasingly shortened-attention spans, intellectual incuriosity, and the constant desire to be entertained at the expense of being educated…..here:
“As a society we've outsourced our intellectual curiosity in order to be able to watch mindless programming. We have little desire to be educated, only to be entertained. Few people understand methodology, or probabilistic reasoning, & our ability to think critically is poor. 41/
I wrote something in 2006 that touches on this point: "I've recently read articles that said 63% of 18-24 year-olds could not find Iraq on a map, and 50% could not find New York state. 42/
This is the age group whose asses will be shipped over there if we ever have a draft,.. yet they're too f*cking stupid or lazy to pay close enough attention to know where it is?! 43/
Yet I'm sure that this same demographic was a majority of the 43 million [people] who voted for American Idol ....who when surveyed, 35% said they ‘believe votes on American Idol matter as much as or more than those cast in a U.S. presidential election’….44/
Two weeks later: “Just a little follow up: 64 million American idol votes in the final round. No American President has received that many votes in any one election......ever. (as of 2006)” 45/
This begs the "?": What "American Idol"-like carryover effect did the Apprentice have on the 2016 election? If Simon Cowell ran for president in 2008, how many of those American Idol voters would have voted for him?”
(end quote)
Expanding upon the “entertainment” factor,… 46/
…one of the overlooked factors of Qanon: there’s an interactive, crowd-sourcing component where people compete, receive a “reward” (dopamine) for being the *cleverest*, connecting the furthest dispersed dots, & for (most absurdly) advancing the “story” the furthest/quickest. 47/
Essentially, Qanon has become a multi-million player Dungeons & Dragons-like, choose your own adventure game that is metaphorically being played within the confines of a Doomsday cult-like “escape room”. 48/
Now let’s take everything above, and examine the religious component that underlies Qanon, and how/why “ridiculously entertaining...and intoxicatingly addictive” conspiracy theories may influence the Religious Right’s conspiracy theory susceptibility and attraction to Trump: 49/
(Link to the thread unrolled immediately below:) 50/
“…reality can "boring", and that people don’t like randomness/ambiguity, or [the idea] we’re at the mercy of forces...we don’t understand/can’t comprehend...and that "conspiracy theories are ridiculously entertaining...and intoxicatingly addictive". 51/
Well, an argument can be made that religion was an attempt to explain a random/ambiguous world (reality) that people didn't/couldn't understand or comprehend with "ridiculously entertaining" narratives/stories. 52/
Applying this criteria, an argument can be made that religion was the "original sin": The original conspiracy theory. 53/
This also explains why so many Christians support a guy who not only violates every value they claim to hold, but whose pathological dishonesty has resulted in 20k documented lies: Trump's entire existence is a "ridiculously entertaining" conspiracy theory (lie).” (end quote) 54/
Now let’s examine the gravitational pull between some narcissists and religion, and how that factored into Trump’s cult following: (link to thread that’s unrolled below) 55/
“One of the things I’ve observed in my personal experiences with Narcissists…..and I see parallels to the interplay between Trump, Evangelicals, and “Collective Narcissism”…..is the gravitational pull that some narcissists feel towards religion. 56/
The gravitational pull between narcissists and religion exists for a number of reasons. For starters, the self-righteousness that religion provides for people is extremely attractive to those who view themselves with pathological levels of grandiosity/superiority. 57/
Second, the idea that an all-knowing, all-powerful God-like figure not only wants to have a “personal relationship” with them, but is literally singling them out and currying favor on them and their life…..is an extremely intoxicating form of narcissistic supply. 58/
The narcissist not only feels elevated to a deified level of “us”, but avoids the punitive wrath (fear) that the non-believing “them” will suffer. 59/
All of the above not only ties into “collective narcissism”,…60/
The above analysis may also explain their need to not only build Trump up into something that he isn’t, but to aggressively…..and perhaps even violently…..defend the façade that he has created, and they have bought into…62/
….because the *greater* they build Trump up to appear to be……the greater the narcissistic supply they receive from him when it appears that he is looking out and “fighting” for them… 63/
….because similar to the religious “personal relationship”/deified “level of elevation” dynamic mentioned above, Trump’s false claims of fighting for the "little guy", the coal miner, the farmer, etc.,..even while exploiting them for personal gain…64/
… stimulates his base’s narcissism because the *all-powerful*, *all-knowing* Donald Trump elevates them into the in-group “us”, while satisfying their need and lust for political blood sport against the out-group “them”.
(end quoted thread)
65/
Since the objective of this thread/article is to analyze Qanon as religion, in the excerpt directly above, let’s replace God and/or Trump with “Q”, and religion with “Qanon dogma”, and the analysis remains relatively seamless: 66/
(begin modified quoted thread)
"Something I’ve observed in my personal experiences with Narcissists…..& I see parallels to the interplay between “Q”, Qanon cultists, and “Collective Narcissism”…..is the gravitational pull that some narcissists feel towards Qanon dogma. 67/
The gravitational pull between narcissists and Qanon exists for a number of reasons. For starters, the self-righteousness that Qanon dogma provides for people is extremely attractive to those who view themselves with pathological levels of grandiosity/superiority. 68/
Second, the idea that an all-knowing, God-like figure [is “blessing” them with special/secret knowledge] is an extremely intoxicating form of narcissistic supply. 69/
The narcissist not only feels elevated to a deified level of “us”, while avoiding the punitive wrath (fear) that the non-believing (non-“awakening”) “them” will suffer. 70/
All of the above not only ties into “collective narcissism”, but it makes it easier to understand the dysfunctional gravitational pull to “Q” by *authoritarian followers*. 71/
The above analysis may also explain their need to not only build Trump (“Q”) up into something that he isn’t, but to aggressively…..and perhaps even violently…..defend the façade that he has created, and they have bought into…72/
…because the *greater* they build Trump (“Q”) up to appear to be……the greater the narcissistic supply they get from him when it appears that he is looking out and fighting for them…73/
…because similar to the religious “personal relationship”/deified “level of elevation” dynamic mentioned above, Trump’s/(Q’s”) false claims of fighting for the "little guy", the coal miner, the farmer, etc.,..even while exploiting them for personal gain… 74/
….stimulates the cult’s narcissism because the *all-powerful*, *all-knowing* Donald Trump/”Q” elevates them into the in-group “us”, while satisfying their need and lust for political blood sport against the out-group “them”.
(end modified quoted thread) 75/
Bringing this back to Qanon….similar to religion, people are weaving together subjective perceptions and experiences to create meaning in their lives by making associations between unrelated events. 76/
People are fanatically attempting to create meaning from “signs”, where it does not otherwise exist…..except that instead of interpreting the grill marks on a grilled cheese sandwich as an image of Jesus, and interpreting that holy sandwich as a religious symbolism…77/
….they’ve interpreted something as innocuous as Trump wearing a yellow tie as a coded symbol/sign that the Coronavirus is fake. 78/ (theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…).
This fanatical drive to create/discover meaning on a societal/global scale, creates/provides a false sense of meaning/purpose for people where it is desperately lacking in their lives. 79/
Qanon is a hyper-magnified/amplified version of Baader-Meinhof phenomenon (frequency illusion), where the sudden awareness of something creates the illusion that it’s everywhere……and therefore *must* mean *something*. 80/
Taking all of this together, we have the perfect-storm convergence where a celebrity/reality tv obsessed society….was conned by a sociopathic narcissistic conman who lied at such a pathological level that… 81/
…it caused people, many of whom were already products of religious conditioning (suspension of logic/evidence for “belief”), and who may literally have been engaging in physiological pain-avoidant behavior (experienced when defying a group from which they derive identity)….82/
…to not only believe that the truth was unknowable, but to feel liberated by a psychological “circuit breaker”-like affect to believe whatever they wanted, regardless of how “loosely associated” to reality, or tightly embraced with “meta-magical thinking”…83/
….with those beliefs simultaneously providing a dopamine-rewarding form of interactive reality tv-like entertainment…where the tv audience are the contestants, & the cult leader “stars” of the show are viewed with hero-worshipping idolization as prophets and “chosen ones”. 84/
Circling back to the question of whether we are witnessing the birth of a new religion….b/c there are so many Christian themes/references w/in the Qanon dogma, we may not necessarily be witnessing the birth of a new religion, so much as the modernization of a current one. 85/
As a result, we may simply be witnessing a religion being updated/modernized by infusing it with hyper-stimulating pop cultural entertainment, and then weaponizing modern technology (social media) to proselytize the conspiratorial delusions onto the rest of the country. 86/
Regardless of whether Qanon is the birth of a new nation, or a modernized perversion of an old one……the overarching concern is the same: 87/
In 2019, the FBI included multiple references to Qanon when classifying fringe conspiracy theories as a domestic terror threat.
This is perhaps the most dangerous scenario because it would seem incredibly difficult to contain a conspiratorial delusion once it receives not just “free speech” protections of the protection of the 1st Amendment, but also its “Freedom of Religion” protections. 89/
As seen with the recent “deplatforming”, and the uninformed/false accusations of violations of 1st Amend (which only restricts government action) by private companies…..strictly from a “free speech” standpoint, containing conspiracy theories is difficult/contentious enough. 90/
….But trying to contain and diffuse “religious” disinformation and conspiratorial delusions that have received “freedom of religion” protection of 1st Amendment freedom will be even more difficult. 91/
Sidenote regarding Qanon, conspiracy theories, and Margery Taylor Green's recent, cowardly avoidance of accountability for her actions:
When Green says, "I was allowed to believe things that weren’t true".....she's basically making a case for the deplatforming of disinformation.
Essay form of this thread analyzing whether Qanon is morphing into a religion (no paywall): patreon.com/posts/47160497
Thread on the "Firehose of Lies" that groomed people to highly receptive to Qanon and its conspiratorial delusions:
In April, a multidisciplinary report was released addressing young men. The report opened with by quoting me.....which is relevant to Trump's election victory:
It's really difficult to pause, and reflect when we are consumed with fear and anxiety. Contemplating our "shadow" in the Carl Jungian sense is a higher level of consciousness....it requires us to engage our prefrontal cortex.
Fear and anxiety keep the amygdala engaged in overdrive.....which hijacks the prefrontal cortex.
The more scared and anxious we are, the more self-preservational we become.
1/
Exposure to chronic stress and fear literally rewires our brains to become rewired, and to become disproportionately reactive to stress/anxiety/fear…
....so that we respond to subsequent stress/fear-inducing experiences more intensely and for a longer duration:
At the most extreme levels, self-preservation presents in ways that are similar to Cluster B Personality Disorders:
We become consumed with the self (narcissism) to the point of recklessly disregarding others (sociopathy)....it becomes a Darwinian, dog-eat-dog, law of the jungle mentality.
It's becoming increasingly clear that the greatest danger of a Trump election victory on January 5th may not be Trump…….
.....it’s that JD Vance will be Vice President to a guy who is almost 80 years old, who is obese, and who doesn’t believe in exercise
This interview with Tapper displays Vance’s dishonesty, bad faith, and his considerable gaslighting skill.
This interview displays how difficult it is to have a rational, logical, internally consistent conversation with someone who as intelligent, and as skilled in gaslighting as Vance.
In this interview, Vance obscures and distracts from the focus on Trump’s personality disorders and lack of character by dismissively framing the people warning about Trump as being war-lusting "disgruntled" employees who are only speaking out because they have "an axe to grind".
Tapper:
4 star Marine Corp General/DHS secretary/Chief of Staff John Kelly’s,
4 star Marine Corp General/Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis;
3 star General/National Security Adviser H.R McMaster
Trump appointed Chairman of Joint Chief of Staffs Mark Milley;
Vice President Mike Pence;
John Bolton
Secretary of Defense John Esper
Vance: “Are you going to listen to every Trump administration official?”
One of the manipulative tactics of gaslighting manipulators is to frame the other party to the argument as being at fault, or ridiculous, for bringing up serious issues and/or egregious behaviors.
Here, for example, Vance implies that the problem isn’t that an unprecedented number of highly accomplished people are warning about Trump’s psychological unfitness…..it’s that:
1) Tapper is *ridiculous* because he is listing/listening to “every Trump administration official”
…and….
2) ….all of these unprecedented warnings from highly accomplished officials about Trump being psychologically unfit from actually exposes a flaw in Kamala Harris: that she won’t fire anyone…..and that all of these people are disgruntled because Trump fired them. Basically, Vance is saying that all of these people warning about Trump's unfitness is a sign of Trump's leadership, as evidenced by his propensity to fire people.
Not only is Vance gaslighting with his pivot away from their warnings, but he’s lying. When Tapper goes down the list pointing out that Trump actually did not fire them....which undermines Vance’s entire argument…..Vance doubles down on his false narrative/lies:
“He fired a lot of those people, Jake, and he did so because they weren’t doing their job.”
Vance then
Vance tries to gaslight and distract from John Kelly’s warnings about Trump's unfitness when he claims that John Kelly’s “fundamental disagreement” with Trump is because Trump would not accede to his warmongering:
“Why does John Kelly not support Trump? It’s about policy not personality”.
Tapper rebuts Vance's gaslighting by pointing out that Kelly said he agrees with Trump on almost all policies. Tapper also points out that Kelly lost a son in Afghanistan and never stated whether he supported the wars he and his son fought in.
Vance gaslights again: “Is your argument that a person who lost a son means they can’t be wrong about public policy?.....then why bring that up”
Tapper points out that Kelly never took a public position on whether Kelly agreed with the wars.
Vance supports his gaslighting narrative/claim, not with evidence, but with "feels" and *second hand conversations* (see below) when he says: “….because I KNOW John Kelly’s worldview…and I know the people who have attacked Donald Trump the most vociferously on foreign policy they’ll say well he’s a dictator, and what they really mean is that Donald Trump won’t listen to the leadership of the military when they want Trump to start ridiculous conflicts”.
Vance is attempting to dismiss numerous extremely accomplished people’s concerns about Trump’s psychological unfitness, and frame it as “policy disagreements”.....from disgruntled fired former employees (even though most resigned).....as being from people who are driven by the inhumanity/profit of war.....and from people who oppose Trump because he is a “dove” who only wants peace and prosperity.
Remember, Trump has rooted for American suffering so he can politically/personally benefit from it (stock market, border security bill, etc.)
After sensing observing that Vance is relying on what “I know” rather than facts, empirical evidence....Tapper says:
“….you’re ascribing worldviews based on gut…there’s no evidence…”
3:30 Vance: “Based on people I’ve talked to in the Trump administration….” (second hand conversations)
Tapper: “Kelly was at DHS and chief of staff, he was not weighing in…[on the wars]”
Question:
When Vance called Trump Hitler, and "cultural heroin"…..was it because Vance opposed Trump’s peace and prosperity-driven public/foreign policy?
Tapper quoting Vance: “I guarantee John Kelly talked with Harris's campaign….People close to Kelly and the Harris campaign”.
When Tapper reports that both sides denied speaking to each other.
Vance says, “Oh, I’m highly skeptical of that, Jake…..you know the way these attacks work. You know the way these people are often vetted….”
Tapper: “…so you made it up?
Vance: “No (but Vance’s tone when denying he made it up suggests otherwise)… I said the American media and Dem party apparatus works a certain way, if it comes out that John Kelly never ever spoke with [the Harris campaign]….then I’m happy too…”
Tapper: “I’m telling you that.”
Vance: "You’re telling me that based on second hand conversation with John Kelly…..and it’s interesting, we’ve now spent three minutes talking about John Kelly…..if it is true that he never spoke with anyone in Kamala Harris’ orbit I’m happy to apologize to John Kelly for mis-stating how he delivered this news to the Atlantic Magazine…”
….and then Vance uses the choice of who Kelly spoke to as a means of delegitimizing Kelly's warnings:
“Jeffrey Goldberg who lied the U.S. into the Iraq war, which led to the deaths of millions of innocent Arabs and thousands of innocent Americans…..you don’t go to that guy if you don’t have a particular ideological motive. I think that’s what’s going on, if I’m wrong, I’m happy to say I’m wrong.”
Vance speculates and accuses people of motives that he, “thinks”, what he “knows”, etc.
2/
Vance, once again tries to shift the focus from Trump’s unfitness, to Tapper for asking the questions about it:
“But, this is the thing, Jake, we’ve now spent 5 minutes talking about people in Donald Trump’s staff……”
Tapper: “….who think he’s unfit for office…”
Vance: “….who he fired……oh, they didn’t think he was unfit for office until they had a falling out with him because he fired him….”
Vance continues to lie about
1) Mattis/Kelly/etc., being fired,…
...and... 2) about their level of concern when they agreed to work for Trump: Many of them went to work for Trump precisely BECAUSE they thought he was unfit, needed guardrails, and/or viewed it as a responsibility to the country to help Trump (and the country) have a successful/stable presidency.
Tapper attempts to talk about Trump’s literal statements/quotes about threatening to use the military against Americans.
Vance pathetically claims that Tapper is stating what Trump “allegedly said”, and tries to cling to the defense that Trump never actually said the words, “American citizens”.
This is another gaslighting technique by Vance who wants to get hung up on semantics, and defends Trump saying he would use the military against American citizens.
Vance: “He did not say he would send the military after the American people! Show me the quote where he said that…..He said far Left wing lunatics. He’s talking about people rioting after the election……people who burned down American cities in the summer of 2020…..yes, we should have a federal law enforcement response.”
Tapper points out the Trump said he wants to use the military against the “enemy within”, and that Trump has described the Left, Pelosi, Schiff, etc. as “the enemy within”.
Vance then tries to obfuscate, but then says he agrees with Trump that the military should be used to go after people who riot and burn down cities.
Some thoughts….
1) Virtually all of the people Vance mentioned are “American people/citizens”, so Vance intentionally argued and denied the obvious meanings of Trump’s statements to create conversational/interview chaos….....before finally agreeing with what Trump said.
2) “Left wing lunatics” is subjective. And in Trump’s pathological mind, anyone who opposes or attempts to hold him accountable is a “lunatic”.
How would a Democratic president define “Right Wing lunatics”? How would MAGA react to Harris using the military against MAGA rioters? We already know the answer to that question because MAGA has lionized the January 6th convicts as “political prisoners”.
3) Vance seemingly misspeaks about using the military against “people rioting after the election”, because he does not repeat that when he reiterates people who riot and burn down cities should have the military used against them. Imagine victimhood/martyrdom narratives that the Right would lose their mind over if Biden/Harris used the military on MAGA protestors. The Right is still incensed over the manner with which the Capitol Police defended the Capitol.
@JDVance…..the same pathetic, dishonest, gaslighting coward who relies on what he “thinks”/“knows” when making unsubstantiated “gut” accusations against the Generals/cabinet members speaking out against Trump “based on people [Vance] talked to in the Trump administration” ….
.....suddenly has a problem with an “anonymously sourced story”….meaning unsubstantiated….and “second hand conversations with John Kelly”.
3/
This is a really interesting conversation. There are multiple things going on:
1) @GreggHurwitz is giving very informative presentation about how our foreign enemies are tearing apart the country….and how to mitigate the polarization/tribalism that foreign (and domestic) enemies are stoking.
2) The subtext of the discussion is one that plays out repeatedly across the country:
An acknowledgment that the country is being torn apart by divisive, “pathological”, “psychopaths” and “narcissists”…..yet people’s personal investment (identity), ego/pride, emotion-driven subjectivity cause them to either...
.....be incapable of seeing their personal, or the collective tribe’s (political leaders/partisan media/constituents), contribution to the problem……
@Gregghurwitz is trying to comprehensively analyze a multidimensional problem that both sides contribute to…..
....and with one or two exceptions, Peterson is insistent on only pointing out the Left’s problems, while completely ignoring that Trump is not only the antithesis of conservative values/culture that Peterson views as the core of human civilization…..
....but that, due to his severe Cluster B Personality Disorders, Trump is also incapable of conducting himself in a way that does not destroy that “core”....that “center”….that is referred to repeatedly in the discussion.
2/
This discussion....and tribalism more generally....feels like the verbal equivalent of color blindness where....
....instead of one party to the conversation not being able to see reds and greens....
.....Peterson does not hear verbal “reds and greens”:
Constructive criticisms of the Right....
....and, more importantly....
....the fundamental cancerous cause of Right Wing toxicity: Trump
3/
The diagnostic criteria for personality disorders are “a pervasive pattern” of behavior that falls outside of a normal range….to the point of drastically deviating from generally acceptable behavior.
The diagnostic criteria for personality disorders are “a pervasive pattern” of behavior that falls outside of a normal range….to the point of drastically deviating from generally acceptable behavior.