The Democrat Party in US devises its India strategy based on the inputs it gets from global left units in India, which would be the Lutyens media. Why it gets India wrong each time and underachieves on its objectives vis a vis India. A short thread+
It’s no secret that President Obama + Secretary Hillary did not want Modi to become India’s PM. They continued the Bush era sanctions on Modi wrt visiting US and other interventions hoping that those would undermine Modi’s image in India. The outcome was the opposite.
The US sanctions on Modi actually boosted his image in India, or at the least did nothing 2 weaken him. Modi won the PM chair of world’s most populous democracy with a record mandate in 2014. While he was on US no visa list. This was a clear embarrassment for US foreign policy.
President Obama swiftly called to congratulate Modi and invited him to visit US. Modi being Modi, that is, nurturing an immense hunger for international plaudits was only too happy to accept and almost take the first plane to US to meet his best friend Barak.
Do note that Modi is no Indira. Indira was a child of privilege, spent large parts of her girlhood in Europe, was fluent in English & French. A side effect of that whatever else she was, she did not hanker for approval from US or Europe. How she retaliated 2 Nixon is well known.
Anyway, given Modi’s persona, Obama could easily make amends for earlier foreign policy miscalculation. Then in 2016 Trump won and US foreign policy towards India changed in that the Trump administration was not clued into Lutyens of India.
With another Democrat regime back in helm in US in 2021, US foreign policy on India is again being based on Lutyens input. Lutyens still does not want Modi as Indian CM. They would want to strengthen any public agitation against Modi.
The farmer agitation is a golden opportunity to destabilize Modi regime as Lutyens sees it. And Lutyens thinks that intervention of international celebrities would undermine Modi in India and strengthen the farmers’ agitation. They are spectacularly wrong yet again.
Its inconceivable that Meena Harris is tweeting so gleefully on farmers’ agitation without even tacit approval of her VP aunt and therefore the highest echelon of Biden-Harris regime. Meena Harris’ claim to fame is her lineage of which she is gaining financially (books etc).
So, in other words the current regime in US believes that the intervention by international celebrities including Meena Harris would weaken Modi in India and generate sympathy for the farmer agitation in India. How wrong can they be!
The intervention of the global celebrities, particularly those in US and particularly Meena Harris, would strengthen Indian public opinion for Modi and reduce domestic sympathy for the farmer agitations.Indian common people are staunch nationalists&dislike dictation from outside
Unwittingly yet again the Lutyens and the current US regime is strengthening Modi. The result of disjunct from local soil.
PS:To see where Democrats get their inputs in India 4m, note how frequently Hillary, top staff of Kamala Harris interview with Barkha Dutt, as also Meena Harris’ Twitter friendship with Rana Ayuub. Didn’t see such camradarie between Trump regime top office bearers & Lutyens.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Saswati Sarkar

Saswati Sarkar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sarkar_swati

8 Feb
What is Indic civilizational legacy on FoE? Sabitri debated with Yamraj, the God of death, won the debate and got her husband’s life back. Nachiketa questioned Yamraj. Draupadi debated the entire court when she was being humiliated, & eventually got her husbands free.
All these individuals were speaking “truth to power”, to the ultimate power, be it God of Death or be the monarch & his courtiers in a royal court. So that “truth to power” is intrinsic in Indic civilization.
In documented history, Shankaracharya rejuvenated Hinduism by defeating Buddhist scholars in debates in court after court.
Read 5 tweets
8 Feb
FoE has two pillars to rely upon - 1)laws protecting speech 2) social protection for speech.The laws invariably protect against Govt intrusion though there is no reason why such laws should apply on private companies, but they don’t today.Comparison between India & US wrt these:
US still has stronger laws on FoE. The First Amendment. Nothing remotely comparable in India. The Supreme Court of the United States has refused to define hate speech simply because of the subjectivity involved.
But the laws can take one only so far without social backing. In fact cultural ethos is any day a far stronger deterrent on free speech because social influence is pervasive while the Govt can sanction only so many. This is exactly where India today scores over US.
Read 16 tweets
7 Feb
I don’t know the farm law, so won’t venture in2 the debate that it is right or wrong.There is clearly strong Corp. backing of the law which should make us suspicious given Corporate history.But while one set of farmers oppose another set (in different states) support. So 2 sides+
+ What is in some ways amusing is the set of celebrities who have jumped to its support or opposition. Neither set has any connection to farmers, have not shown any interest in farmers’ issues earlier and have chosen sides nonetheless +
Tells us how celebrities are garnered for “causes” and how seriously one ought to take their endorsement or opposition. +
Read 9 tweets
5 Feb
independent.co.uk/news/world/asi… India threatens to jail Twitter employees for non compliance with orders to ban accounts and posts related to farmers agitation. A short thread on the hypocrisy of the reactions to this
After Twitter banned several posts&a/c in US including that of then President of US,it has no moral ground to complain when GoI threatens to act for refusing to replicate the act in India. If Twitter complains, it is essentially saying it has the sole right 2 decide who can post.
But Twitter can not claim any kind of sovereignty. It is a pvt company and subject to the laws of the land. It can contest GoI in a court in India, but that’s about it. From a principled POV, a nation state must be more powerful than a pvt company because its rulers are elected.
Read 7 tweets
4 Feb
How Meena Harris, Niece Of US VP  Kamala Harris, Opposing Indian Farm Laws, Is Becoming A Problem For White House. The Swarajyamag article is meant to mislead their readers counting on their limited knowledge of US politics. A short thread below: swarajyamag.com/world/how-meen…
Meena Harris’ aunt Kamala Harris is very close to US celebrities and Corporates. Most of the leading Democrats, particularly the California Democrats are. Meena Harris is following her aunt’s path here +
Meena Harris’ plug of Rana Ayuub is hardly a problem for White House. Rana Ayuub is the India columnist of Washington Post. WaPo had blatantly supported Biden starting from the Democratic primaries.
Read 6 tweets
3 Feb
Can a private company conduct its business in any way it wants? Follow the net neutrality debate. Many countries have legislated that service providers can not discriminate between content providers. So, legislating not to allow discrimination between speech in same vein
If net neutrality is mandated, an Internet Service Provider (ISP) (a private company) can not enter into a deal with a content provider (another private company) to provide better quality of service to its content over others or refuse 2 carry contents of other content providers
Net neutrality is mandated in countries like US, India though some loopholes exist. But broader point, private companies are required to do business as per the law of the land. So, forcing speech neutrality by Big Tech is within Govt prerogative
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!