Why use of phrase "proof of widespread fraud" without a jury involved?
Objectively EXCEEDED LEVELS of TARGETED fraud
the STANDARD is LEVELS of SUSPICION that requires or allows further 'peeling back the layers'
substitute "TARGETED FRAUD"
and levels of suspicion:
...
Objectively EXCEEDED LEVELS of TARGETED fraud
the STANDARD is LEVELS of SUSPICION that requires or allows further 'peeling back the layers'
substitute "TARGETED FRAUD"
and levels of suspicion:
...
...thee STANDARD is LEVELS of SUSPICION that requires or allows further 'peeling back the layers'
insert "TARGETED FRAUD" instead
and levels of suspicion:
1) Objective violations (e.g. preventing effective scrutiny, false or misleading claims)
...
insert "TARGETED FRAUD" instead
and levels of suspicion:
1) Objective violations (e.g. preventing effective scrutiny, false or misleading claims)
...
...2) Reasonable Suspicion (e.g. articulated [reason] issues)
3) Probable Cause - more likely than not (50% + 1)
4) Proof - Jury [jurors of facts] decides facts NOT judges [jurors of law]
3) Probable Cause - more likely than not (50% + 1)
4) Proof - Jury [jurors of facts] decides facts NOT judges [jurors of law]
@threadreaderapp Can you please unroll my Constitutionally-sound soliloquy?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
