On 13 May 2020 the rules were relaxed slightly so that people not from the same household could meet outside the home for exercise or open air recreation
So you could 'recreate' with someone outside, but not inside
This led, 12 days later, to the introduction of "linked households" (support bubbles) - a person living alone could "link" with another household and be one household with them
So a limited way to get around the prohibition on indoor gatherings
That was presented as a way single people could stay the night with loved ones (but not great for dating as once you linked with a household there was no way of linking with another even if you broke with the first)
There were a number of local lockdown laws which were brought in during this period which switched the sex ban on and off in various areas (see docs.google.com/document/d/1ne…)
Nb this was all really serious for people starting relationships but kind of seen as collateral damage to lockdown restrictions
As late as 23 September (6 months after the March lockdown) the government released guidance on people in "established relationships" on whether they should socially distance from each other.
(nb the 2 meter rules has never been part of law in England)
Then came the November/December lockdown - again no gatherings of more than 1 indoors so not great for sex with someone not in your household if not a linked household, but you could go out for exercise/open air recreation with anyone
Then we had the December relaxation including Christmas Linked Gatherings, the three tiers and generally a looser set of rules. So not bad for dating especially if you were in one of the lower tiers
And that brings us to the present day, where we are in Lockdown 3, which began on 6 January. This goes back to the strictures of the 26 March lockdown except you can meet outdoors for exercise with someone not from your household
One important thing to note is that the government no longer has its guidance about people in established relationships, so the implication is tough luck unless you (1) live together or (2) are part of a linked household gov.uk/government/pub…
You're welcome! 💕💘💝
The least romantic thread in history = a lawyer explaining all the ways sex and dating have been illegal in 2020-21
Oh and another important change since the Autumn is that you can now switch linked households as long as you wait 10 days after the break. So not bad for dating but depends on your schedule and speed! legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/1374…
So, to conclude, sex indoors with someone not from your household or linked household has been illegal for more than half of the period since 26 March 2020 to today. Dating has been illegal on and off.
Agreed. Linked households have only ever been a limited exception and eg useless for individuals who both live in flat shares
Reliably informed the people of Leicester have been unable to have sex indoors with someone not from their household/linked household for entire period from 23 March to now - 10 months. Correct: 4 July when indoor restrictions relaxed in England they had local restrictions added
Also the or original three tiers introduced on 14 Oct not dating or Dec friendly in tiers 2/3. So basically it’s been a sad old year for everyone but especially Leicester
Oh yes and Manchester since 8 August has had strict restrictions so basically only had a month of being able to meet indoors.
For those saying this is unprecedented, sex between gay men indoors and out was illegal until 1967 when it was made legal indoors from age 21. Age of consent wasn’t reduced to 16 as it is with heterosexual men and women until 2001
True. I was focused on dating because that was the question I was originally asked but this equally applies to people in long term relationships who don’t live together
I wrote a long-read on the human rights implications of lockdown.
Not straightforward, I tried to take seriously extreme danger of Covid, difficulty in proving the impact of lockdown measures and the collateral damage they have on our lives unherd.com/2021/02/the-da…
If you are looking for an article saying lockdowns are bad and shouldn’t happen, you will be disappointed. If you are looking for an article saying lockdowns are the obvious best way to deal with a pandemic, the stricter the better, not for you. The world is complicated...
I appreciate it’s a hotly contested issue and people have formed rival camps but having spent a lot of time talking about the complex human rights implications, and difficulties in proving what works, I think it is crucial to analyse properly as we approach a year of lockdown
This is very troubling footage. These are not detainees. I am dubious that there is a legal basis for the police using force. There is a power under the self-isolation regulations to use reasonable force to return somebody to the place they are supposed to be isolating ... /1
but as far as I know, people at barracks weren’t given formal notifications to self isolate (I hear people tested but not given results/ a letter sent by ‘Ready Homes’ telling them to self-isolate prob isn’t formal notification) and therefore there was no power of enforcement /2
In any case, I can’t see how the police can have known who was legally required to self isolate and who was not. We do not know the full facts but it is plausible the police have unlawfully assaulted this man
Some good news for those following scandalous conditions for asylum seekers at Napier Barracks. In its first judgment the High Court ordered a vulnerable asylum seeker to be transferred out in 24 hrs. @DoughtyStreet’s @leoniehirst acting for @dpg_law, I act in 2 linked cases
Really excellent hard work from the @dpg_law team @SueWillman@EmilySoothill and my brilliant colleague @leoniehirst. The four cases of vulnerable asylum seekers held in atrocious, dangerous conditions we act for will be heard at a permission hearing in 2 weeks.
The judgment was given orally but will he up I imagine quite soon. Some important ‘prima facie’ (preliminary) findings on the truly atrocious conditions on the site and confirmation that asylum seekers can lawfully be moved out under the self-isolation regulations.
As trailed by Home Secretary last week there is now a fixed penalty notice of £800 (or £400 if you pay within 14 days) for participating in an gathering of over 15 people in a private residence
Fixed Penalty Notices double for each subsequent “large gathering offence” up to £6,400
Compare:
- Ordinary fixed penalty notice is £200 or £100 if paid in 14 days
- Holding or being involved in the holding of a gathering of over 30 people is £10,000