Today’s @nytimes story highlights a familiar but lethal disparity issue in COVID-19 care: Ensuring that patients get care at the right hospitals--and that hospitals actually providing such care have the resources they need for proper care. nytimes.com/2021/02/08/us/… Thread (1/n)
Vaccines, PPE, distancing+hand-washing are obviously critical. Another immediate imperative to save lives: Ensuring that COVID patients receive care at hospitals w/staffing, resources+expertise to treat them—and that front-line hospitals are supported with these resources. (2/n)
Dr. James Mahoney’s death last April from COVID early last year offers one heartbreaking case. nytimes.com/2020/05/18/nyr… [pics]. Too many other cases continue to accumulate.(3/n)
Marquis hospitals face clear financial incentives and have other organizational reasons to decline COVID-19 transfers. While their bed capacity sometimes sits idle, the pandemic overwhelms community hospitals that serve the poor and people of color. (4/n)
Another uncomfortable reality: Safety-net providers may be reluctant to transfer patients to more proficient hospitals. They fear the loss of revenue and autonomy. Organizational morale and prestige take a hit, too. wbez.org/stories/one-ch… (5/n)
COVID patients experience markedly lower mortality rates in ICUs with the low patient-staff ratios, resources and equipment to provide proper care. (6/n)
This isn’t so much about high-tech COVID therapeutics. COVID patients face many of the same risks faced by others w/acute respiratory distress syndrome. The most concerning disparities+poor incentives arising in COVID arise for these patients too healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hbl… (7/n)
Outmoded regulations+protocols worsen the situation. Many COVID patents stuck in wrong hospitals are taken there by ambulance, under questionable regulations that require transport to the nearest hospital rather than to more-proficient ones often only another mile/two away. (8/n)
What to do: (9/n)
States and the federal government must raise Medicaid funding and hospital reimbursement, to ensure that hospitals are able to cover their costs and provide high-quality care to all people, and to reduce toxic incentives to avoid Medicaid patients. (10/n)
States should designate respiratory centers of excellence, building a system similar to stroke+trauma. This would improve incentives for both sending+receiving centers to transferring critically ill patients w/respiratory failure to hospitals best equipped to treat them. (11/n)
Hospital transfers are just the tip of the iceberg in addressing these challenges. COVID provides a critical opportunity to redesign our respiratory care system to address the current crisis, prepare for future pandemics+ improve everyday care for many other patients.(12/n)
We must seize this opportunity to reduce disparities, and save lives.(13/13)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today's intentionally over-simplified+bad-graphic nerd moment seeks to explain why we must keep masking, hand-washing+distancing even after we have a good but imperfect vaccine that reduces transmission by some amount gamma--maybe 70%. Why am I using Greek letters? No idea. (2/n)
Suppose people contract COVID+randomly mix w/others lambda times/day. Each time infected+uninfected person meet, Infection is transmitted w/probability kappa. Infectedsleave the population with probability delta/day. Kappa+lambda can be reduced through distancing+masking. (3/n)
I've been thinking lately about what makes Twitter so toxic. Aside from its obvious problems, I think we all need to rethink "dunking-on" culture. And I've come to believe that winning arguments is often over-rated in creating lasting change+political reforms. (1/n=10)
Building relationship, sharing perspectives, and genuinely listening are usually much more important than besting someone in an argument. I felt this first-hand doing GOTV in 2008, 12+16. I teach health policy. So I probably know more policy than the ambivalent voter (2/n)
who greets me at her doorstep. What would I accomplish by out-debating her about ACA or whatever? Generally nothing. Less than nothing. She'd be embarrassed+probably hardened in her perspective, only sorry that her smart cousin wasn't around, who would have really kicked (3/n)
The NY AG suggests that the Trump Foundation is a comprehensive fraud. I fully believe this, but I am also truly puzzled. (thread). nytimes.com/2018/12/18/nyr…
I'm not surprised that the Foundation is riddled with self-dealing, hidden favoratism, and tax scams. washingtonpost.com/politics/trump…
I'm not surprised that the Foundation's main purpose other than these scams is to promote Trump himself. washingtonpost.com/news/post-poli…
58. I share the anger that leads many of us to shun President Trump+his core political team. Let’s do so with cold civility, properly acerbic but with no profanity or screaming, let alone any form of physical intimidation.
59. We should proceed with confidence. Most Americans don’t want 5-year-olds separated from their parents at the border or millions of people to lose Medicaid. They don’t want tax cuts for the top 1%.
60. They also don’t want the Supreme Court to overrule Roe v. Wade or to protect President Trump from legal difficulty. Democrats may not be able to defeat Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination, though this provides a powerful mobilization opportunity. crooked.com/article/trump-…
33. The President pursues many policies that hurt millions of people, often vulnerable+politically marginalized people. The Muslim ban+his cruelty towards immigrants are the most obvious examples of measures that must be strongly resisted.
34. He has key weaknesses. He is angry, nervously defensive+deeply unpopular despite a strong economy which should have boosted his fundamentals. His immigration, health+tax policies are quite unpopular outside his base. That’s one reason he lies about these policies so much.
35.He rightly perceives that he holds the official levers of the presidency, but lacks the moral+political legitimacy every one of his predecessors walked into office with. His presidency carries a huge asterisk+everyone knows it.
25.King also knew his audience. Though he certainly hoped to change hearts, he wasn't expecting to change the hearts of Birmingham’s white elite. He was trying to defeat them. He wasn’t relying on changing the hearts of white people across the northern states.
26.The moral clarity of his cause helped, too. At some level, many white Americans understood that, even if they also nitpicked the civil rights movement’s confrontational tactics+consistently preferred the slower, less decisive+discomfiting path to dismantling official racism.
27.(King+others had markedly less success dismantling other, less bald+official forms of racism+segregation. That story haunts us to this day.) epi.org/publication/th…