It is so frustrating to spend tons of time reading and thinking about a policy problem only for pretty much every solution to be foreclosed by the fact that the GOP has broken American governance — and then to feel like you're being some kind of blinkered partisan as a result
It really is the case that the American political system is designed around the major factions in power acting in good faith. The system fails when one isn't.

That's what's happening! It's at the root of a huge number of our problems!
And yet, it feels off to focus on this problem so much — like it's reductive or cheap. Writers are supposed to have complex solutions to complex problems, to sound smart and disinterested.

Yet today, the basic problem is excruciatingly simple — but devilishly hard to solve.
Confession time: I'm terrified of cognitive biases. I spend huge amounts of time thinking about how to mitigate them, and I know partisan brain can be one of the most powerful warping forces imaginable.

But how do you resist the obvious conclusion here? fivethirtyeight.com/features/in-am…
This @chrislhayes piece does a good job getting at the dynamics here, especially in his conclusion, with a lot less handwringing about how it makes us pundits feel to have to talk about things in partisan terms theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zack Beauchamp (on paternity leave)

Zack Beauchamp (on paternity leave) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @zackbeauchamp

14 Jan
1. The problem with the Ben Shapiro Playbook isn't primarily the author. It's that the *content* of the piece is bad, in a way that was eminently predictable given the author.

I'm going to go through the entire piece and explain why.
2. Shapiro's core argument is that House Republicans opposed impeachment because they saw it as a Democratic plot to undermine them — and, moreover, that they were right (or at least justified) in thinking that.
3. This logic has a glaring logical flaw: as @jonathanchait points out, Democrats couldn't use impeachment to tie Republicans to Trump *if they voted for it* nymag.com/intelligencer/…
Read 16 tweets
13 Jan
One thing I think we're underplaying in the post-riot analysis: the degree to which Second Amendment ideology, the idea that the people should be constantly be prepared to use force to overthrow the state, created the conditions for this uprising
If you've been to a major conservative movement event, or even just spent time following right-leaning media, you see this idea is omnipresent.

This Jefferson quote is popular: "the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
This is explicitly linked to Democratic rule and policies, especially related to guns. I get at this a little in this piece, specifically in rhetoric from Sharron Angle and Don Young vox.com/policy-and-pol…
Read 5 tweets
12 Jan
If you want to “heal” American democracy, you have to punish the people who are making it sick vox.com/policy-and-pol…
Insights on democracy, violence, and accountability from @kcroninfurman, @pstanpolitics, @JayUlfelder, @henryfarrell, @jennifernvictor, and the late Guillermo O'Donnell all combine to suggest that democracy depends, in some key way, on accountability vox.com/policy-and-pol…
I also spoke with lawyers like @CarolineMCorbin and @sfmnemonic about whether Trump could be arrested for violent incitement — the ultimate form of accountability. It seems quite possible vox.com/policy-and-pol… Image
Read 4 tweets
26 Oct 20
This argument from @ToryAnarchist, who I count as one of the sharpest Trump supporters I know, seems largely at odds with actual American politics — where Democrats and liberals are the ones advocating for more democracy (e.g., abolishing the Electoral College) Image
The Discourse equates Democrats with "elites" because of their cultural power and identification with the academic establishment.

But Trump is unpopular! If he wins, it'll be with a minority of the vote and the backing of six unelected elite credentialed lawyers.
I think this sort of take confuses political systems (democracy) with epistemic standards during democratic deliberation (how much weight to put on expert opinion).
Read 4 tweets
16 Sep 20
It's important to criticize ideas you generally agree with, and I don't think I do it enough. So I want to thread three brief points about what I see as problems in left-liberal discourse today. Not insuperable or fatal problems, but problems nonetheless.
The first is anti-rationalism on identity issues. Sometimes, debates over unsettled empirical questions — would defunding police increase crime? why does Trump seem to be gaining votes among Latinos? — are themselves declared illegitimate or out-of-bounds.
The second, relatedly, is intellectual insularity. Socialist and conservative critics often raise genuinely sharp critiques of liberal politics — particularly relating to class, credentialism and history — that don't get the serious consideration they deserve.
Read 5 tweets
8 Jul 20
I think so much of our free speech debate suffers from treating things that are actually on a spectrum as black-and-white issues.
Everyone agrees that certain speech deserves to be excluded from prominent outlets. It's uncontroversial to say that, for example, the New York Times shouldn't publish an op-ed by David Duke on "the Jewish question."
Similarly, I don't think anyone of good faith and good intentions thinks that National Review was wrong to fire John Derbyshire for being a huge racist. Derb was "cancelled," but generally speaking it was seen as a positive step.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!