Our technocratic overlords do not seem to understand that, even if they can win the academic debate over whether means-testing checks is better stimulus, the millions of people who were promised a check and simply won't receive one aren't going to say "Oh! Well, this is better."
The technocrats are all far too wealthy to receive any stimulus, so to illustrate the folly here, they should try this for their next boat payment. "Well, Mr. Banker, I know I owe you $1000, but analysis says my kid's Ivy League tuition is a better investment."

See how it goes!
It's extremely simple: Democrats promised people $2000 checks if they were elected. The way for them to keep that promise is to give them a $2000 check, not to give them a Harvard-sourced statistical analysis in the New York friggin Times.
It is very telling, however, that top Democrats think that if they can convince a handful of media and political elites that reneging on the check promise is smart, their work is done and they can go home. Elite discourse as the only discourse; voters' preferences are irrelevant.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Will Stancil

Will Stancil Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @whstancil

8 Feb
oh it’s the guy from uncut gems
he’s pretty good!
Watchmen (2019)
Read 4 tweets
26 Jan
Listening to a @jbouie livechat about the filibuster right now and it's made it clear: the filibuster (and particularly reconciliation as a workaround) hasn't just bottled up progressive legislation, but it's warped the entire constitutional system in subtle-but-fundamental ways.
Reconciliation is the only way to get a law through Congress most of the time, and most of Congress's authorities, to regulate or pass social legislation, are inaccessible in reconciliation.
So the role of Congress has shifted. Instead of the broad national legislature envisioned by Article I - a body to rule over the whole country and direct its government - Congress has become, in most cases, an agency for management of the federal budget.
Read 10 tweets
24 Jan
Wow it is almost like DEMOCRATS SHOULD HAVE IMMEDIATELY MOVED TO IMPEACH AND CONVICT TRUMP, rather than RECESSING CONGRESS AND GIVING REPUBLICANS AND FOX NEWS TIME TO BUILD UP AN ALTERNATIVE MYTHOLOGY AROUND THE CAPITOL ATTACK

like my god how is the party so bad at this
"We'll try Trump in February and March, because that will give us time to bUiLd A cAsE aGaInSt TrUmP" says the theoretically wisest minds in the Democratic Party, who apparently spent the last four years in some kind of catatonic fugue state
Who could have possibly predicted that the initial Republican outrage and trepidation over the Capitol attack would eventually diminish and cohere into a vague sense that Trump himself was the victim, except literally everyone who has read a newspaper since 2016
Read 7 tweets
24 Jan
I am so tired of people saying this. Joe Manchin’s greatest asset is people declaring that Joe Manchin will block the entire Democratic agenda, so that no one ever puts Joe Manchin to the test!
Is Joe Manchin really going to stand athwart the Biden administration and his own party’s entire domestic agenda and shout “Stop”?

No, he is probably not! It would doom him electorally!
Joe Manchin doesn’t want to be the sole public holdout (or one of a tiny few), drawing the ire of the entire party base. He is precariously perched in a red state and this would result in political catastrophe for him. He wants to be invisible.
Read 9 tweets
23 Jan
Here is something an alarming number of policymakers still do not understand:

Identifying the poorest, most economically depressed, and least white neighborhoods in a region, and cramming a bunch of subsidized housing into those neighborhoods - that’s racial segregation.
Policymakers think this doesn’t count as a discriminatory, segregative practice if they do it while talking about “Helping cost-burdened families” instead of “Protecting white suburbs,” but they’re doing exactly the same thing either way.
American cities have a 70-year history of putting subsidized housing where poor and black people live, so it doesn’t trouble white, affluent residents.

They’re still doing it, they’ve just made up a bunch of progressive-sounding excuses these days.
Read 4 tweets
22 Jan
Democratic response to every single issue:

Step One: "We'll make the case to American voters!"
Step Two: ???
Step Three: "Republicans will cave to massive public pressure!"
This has been their approach on everything from the filibuster, to covid relief, to blocking Amy Coney Barrett, to Trump's impeachment. It fails every time.
It's just a form of outsourcing all the work of politics to random members of the public, while elected officials get to take on the inoffensive role of "educating the public." As if we elected our leaders to explain things to us, instead of to, you know, take votes and lead.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!