The more I think about the Bruce Springsteen Jeep ad, the more disgusted I get. It's allegedly a call for unity, but it is drenched in a very particular culture's iconography: a Christian church (that superimposes the cross on the US flag), farms, rural living, "the middle" ...
... it's all so white. This is the "America" of nationalist fairy tales: rural land, settled by self-reliant white farmers & good Christians. It's all trucks & dust & manual labor & squinting at the horizon while wiping sweat from your brow. This is the kind of "unity" ...
... designed to comfort (or at least not threaten) white people. It says, "let's unify by joining together to reaffirm America's mythical self-conception, despite the real-world violence & repression it has always entailed."
If I'm, I dunno, a latino housekeeper in Vegas or black Uber driver in Sacramento, what's in the commercial for me? What does this kind of "unity" promise me? What can I find in "the (mythical) middle"? Nothing. It's not for me.
If America ever does come together in some kind of social solidarity again (which looks pretty doubtful), it's not going to be around the myths & iconography of 20th century hegemonic white culture in the US. It's going to be around something NEW -- new stories, new icons.
It's fine, I guess, that Bruce & Jeep are trying to comfort white people. When white people get upset, lots of other people tend to suffer & die. But the ad is a lie, an illusion. That America is gone. A new, genuinely multicultural, multiethnic America awaits. </fin>
Here's an ad that does a much better job capturing patriotism. (h/t @JenTheTiredRN)
This thread kinda took off, so lemme just add: it's entirely possible to think this ad is a misfire while ALSO thinking Springsteen made it with good intentions, remains a good person, and deserves his music-legend status. These can all be true.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Roberts

David Roberts Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drvolts

7 Feb
I guess I really am Gen X because watching Daveed Diggs & Sesame Street shill for f'ing Doordash gives me the hurls.
Wow I was kind of kidding before, but watching these ads ... there really is zero compunction about selling out any more. Any old actor will reprise/exploit any old role, any artist will sell any song, all IP is up for grabs. Am I silly to be a little bummed out by this?
Read 6 tweets
6 Feb
Strongly endorse everything in this @OsitaNwanevu piece. One of the key mistakes I see among Dems, both online & in the real world, is thinking that people believe right-wing nonsense because they are unintelligent or uneducated. newrepublic.com/article/161266…
In the area I know best, climate change, it's been found repeatedly that climate denialists & skeptics have, on average, MORE higher education than those who accept the science. They know MORE about climate science. They have, on average, HIGHER verbal intelligence.
What they do is adopt the conclusion that best serves their social tribe and then use their intelligence & education to build a case for it. It's called "motivated reasoning" & everyone is subject to it, very much including the smartest people.
Read 8 tweets
2 Feb
1. I'm listening to a presentation on this big new report from the National Academies on decarbonizing the US by 2050, focused on policy recommendations. Worth checking out the whole thing, but I just want to emphasize one point. nationalacademies.org/news/2021/02/n…
2. There are lots of disputes & open questions about how to get from, say, 70/80 percent decarbonized to 100%. How much nuclear or CCS will be needed? Hydrogen something? Bioenergy something? Plenty of open tech questions that need to be settled by R&D, etc.

HOWEVER.
3. There is, as Steve Pacala said in his intro, an "island of certainty," which is to say, ALL the models, ALL the different plans & approaches, agree that ***for the next 10 years, the top priority is clean electrification using wind, solar, & batteries***.
Read 5 tweets
1 Feb
Murc's Law: Only Democrats have agency. Everything Republicans do, they were made to do by Democrats. Democrats made them vote for Trump, made them be racist, made them elect Qanon lunatics, made them assault the capitol.
Ask a Republican a moral question & you will never, ever get a first-order answer, about the actual morality of the acts in question. It's "Dems did something worse." It's "Dems made us do it." It's endless variants of, "It's not our fault!" The moral worldview of an adolescent.
An adolescent doesn't care whether or not what he did was wrong, he just doesn't want it pinned on him. He doesn't want the blame, or any responsibility. If he can escape accountability by pointing to someone else who allegedly did something worse, that's enough.
Read 5 tweets
31 Jan
There is a sociological tale to be told about a certain kind of person who had some intensely negative personal interactions with snooty liberals in college, or in their youth, & have transmuted the resulting resentment into a full-on cosmology.
I'm not talking about conservatives (though they share the obsession). I'm talking about people who ideologically incline toward liberalism but view annoying liberals as an overriding national emergency, to the point it occludes all their other political instincts.
Greenwald, Taibbi, that Conceptual James guy, lots of the IDW & Quillette & Persuasion types -- it's clear reading them that their personal resentment is so intense that they feel the need to build these giant theoretical sand castles around it, to lend it deep significance.
Read 10 tweets
31 Jan
This is a familiar tactic from the Obama years. They want Dems to agree that a) it's good to "compromise" on helping people, b) the absurd GOP number is a reasonable "other side" of negotiations. And if Dems engage in good faith? The GOP votes will vanish.
This happened over & over under Obama. Dems would negotiate their own bills down to nothing and then *Republicans would oppose them anyway*. Christ I hope they learned something and won't fall for this again. The right response to this pathetic gambit is: "fuck off."
Something else I'm sure will give me Obama flashbacks: the press will report this as "more partisan squabbling." Somehow they'll never make it clear that one party is fighting to give Americans more help & one party is fighting to give them less.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!