Love this idea of @big_data_kane using his talk @ucsc @ucscgenomics to illuminate the ontogeny of his ideas and the evolution of his thinking to the learners in the audience: "I move as I am inspired."
This talk is both a discussion of the science in his lab and its foundation in personal history and interests: What effect does environment have on scientific processes? How does context affect protein evolution, viral transmissibility and who GETS TO DO science?
Advice for young scholars: Be a historian of your own field. Studying the past can inform how you think about and do science now. It also lets you find people and ideas that you identify with.

Highlights his discovery of John Maynard Smith and this paper: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5411867/
In 2020, he wrote an appreciation of this paper: "I propose that the Protein Space analogy is not only important because of its scientific richness, but also because of what it can teach us about the art of constructing useful and subversive analogies."
genetics.org/content/214/4/…
ends his talk with what is the role of scientists in society? He writes for Wired and Scientific American to make connections between things that may not seem connected but are. Asks: "Why do I do this work? Doesn't it distract from my 'real' work? NO"
paraphrased advice: "Read all the time. Read carefully. There are lots of things you don't have control over but you can have control over your knowledge. This is one of the ways you can make yourself feel more comfortable in the field."
Question from audience: What if papers are a little over your head? "You just need to know a paper *well enough* to be able to talk to someone about it."
Sorry had to leave during the questions!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Needhi Bhalla 💅🏽

Needhi Bhalla 💅🏽 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NeedhiBhalla

11 Feb
👋🏽 Happy #WomenInScience Day!

Do what you can to fix this (from pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27587850/): Image
👋🏽 Happy #WomenInScience Day!

Do what you can to fix this (from pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27852433/): Image
👋🏽 Happy #WomenInScience Day!

Do what you can to fix this (from nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2021/02/01…): Image
Read 8 tweets
9 Feb
Who is this dude and what's his fucking point?
I CANNOT RN
yes PLEASE explain your rationale for using flood gates instead of whirlwind 🙄
Read 12 tweets
18 Nov 20
THAT paper is what happens when you don't recognize that gender bias is systemic and structural in academic STEM
LOOK: I have remained SANE in academic STEM b/c of my women mentors, both senior and peer, b/c we are honest about the reality of being women in STEM: the joy of doing science, the connection with trainees AND the persistent devaluation of our work, most evidently in peer review
This world *waves vaguely around*, in which academic STEM is FIRMLY situated, consistently devalues the contributions and work of women, particularly BIWoC.
Read 12 tweets
17 Nov 20
Is the NIH...unaware that access to NIH funding is often a major determinant in whether women ascend the academic hierarchy?
And I don't just mean success rates, which the NIH is good at reporting! I mean:
ability to get add'l R01s, which can be linked to promotion at some institutions
not consistently getting scores that are borderline and having to navigate that cognitive load and risk assessment
Read 5 tweets
22 Oct 20
Mary Blair Loy discussing job talks as consequential rituals that illustrate the "schema of scientific excellence" and departmental climate that can affect the response to gender of the speaker #AFDSymposium 👏🏽👏🏽
Men more likely to receive highly positive intros, referencing research brilliance, excellence and awards. Women more likely to get "irrelevancies," which implies that there is not much to say about their professional accomplishments, and sometimes included inappropriate comments
Everybody shaking their heads in the zoom 😭😫
Read 33 tweets
18 Oct 20
We also used the Berkeley model at UCSC w our recent, successful cluster hire. Importantly, we learned what worked AND what didn't.
BOTH of these pieces of information are important since dismantling the structural racism, sexism and biases that infuse our definitions of merit and excellence will be an iterative process
I also want to highlight two additional important lessons:
1) identifying allies and developing informal strategies to minimize those who would derail this process
2) there needs to be a corresponding focus on retention.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!