If you think Marjorie Taylor Greene is an unprecedentedly conspiratorial, bigoted nut job, well, then let me introduce you to Republican Congressman James B. Utt, who represented Southern California back when the state was a reliably Republican state in the 50s & 60s.
Utt was a John Birch Society ally. The JBS was somewhat analogous to QAnon, heightening every political disagreement into a sinister conspiracy.

He was also a Republican racist at a time when that was still somewhat novel, blending racism & conspiracism in a now familiar combo.
Take how Utt responded to civil rights protests in Savannah, Georgia in the summer of '63. Civil rights activists were winning concessions in the city that year, w/ MLK even calling it "the most desegregated city south of the Mason-Dixon line."

crmvet.org/tim/tim63b.htm…
Conservative segregationists started spreading rumors that a US Army training exercise in the swamps near Savannah that summer was really an operation to prepare the way for a "Negro Communist State to be Carved Out of the South."
Unless conservatives acted right away, then “10 Million White People [would] be Driven From Their Homes to Make Room for Black Communist Soviet”!

The goal was to make white southerners terrified that the civil rights movement wouldn't stop with demands for equal treatment.
These rumors from the 60s served a very similar function to the rumors today about the post-George Floyd protests of 2020. This is the same function of all those right-wing rumors blaming antifa and BLM for all the violence last summer and on Jan. 6th.

nytimes.com/2021/01/17/us/…
GOP conspiracy mongers like Margorie Taylor Greene are trying to prevent reform by scaring white supporters into thinking that civil rights activists won't stop once they gain equal footing; they want to take everything from you, your police, your suburbs, your elections!!
But what does opposition to desegregation in Georgia have to do with Utt, who represented California?

He took notice because he was ideologically committed to segregation, voting against the Civil Rights Acts of '60 and '64.
So Utt pulled out the key weapon of Congresspeople at the time, the mailing list. He sent a breathless letter--"NOW HEAR THIS AND LISTEN WELL!"--to all of his constituents and allies promoting this conspiracy theory.
He believed that the training exercise, fittingly titled "Operation Water Moccasin" might be the cover for a Cuban-sponsored invasion of Georgia, with Castro shipping over "bare-footed Africans" brought from Angola and trained in guerrilla warfare.
Now, his only ostensible evidence of this was an allegation from a 13yo Cuban refugee who had said that they'd seen "savages" with "big rings in their ears and noses," wearing "short skirts that come just above their knees," and had "heard one of them beat a woman." Okay, so...
This, of course, pulled from various racist tropes of the time. Accusing black men of violence against white women was a staple justification of lynchings, often on equally thin a pretext as the hearsay of a teenager who is in over their head.
But it wasn't just blatant racists who said stuff like this. A few years later, Reagan would joke w/ Nixon about barefoot Africans as a way of asserting America's imperial right to dominate the continent and undermine black members of the United Nations. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Now, Utt hadn't technically said that the exercise *was* a Cuban/UN/JFK plot to invade Georgia. He was just asking questions! Surely there's nothing wrong with asking questions??

Sound familiar? I didn't *say* it was a Jewish space laser; I was just asking questions.
There is one final comparison I'd like to draw. Utt might have been more unhinged with his racist conspiracism, but as the example of fellow Californian Ronald Reagan reminds us, Utt wasn't a complete outlier within his party. He was just more open about it.
And so too with Marjorie Taylor Greene, who is far from the only GOP congressperson willing to play footsies with bigoted conspiracy theorists. Take Ted Cruz, who though now the 2nd most hated man in DC (after Josh Hawley), once had pole position in the '16 GOP primaries.
In 2015, a nearly identical conspiracy theory about a 5th column of communist-backed foot soldiers from a developing country spread among conservatives. The rumors revolved around a US army training exercise called Operation Jade Helm.

vox.com/2015/5/6/85595…
But instead of Angolans from Cuba, Jade Helm conspiracists worried about Mexicans armed by China.

This was just as bizarre and paranoid a conspiracy theory as Operation Water Moccasin had been some fifty years prior. But did GOP leaders push back on the nuts?
Of course not! Ted Cruz has shown that he will play along w/ any conspiracy theory--from Jade Helm to Trump saying his dad assassinated JFK--as long as it has political utility. And signaling to nativist nut jobs that he's at least sympathetic was a cheap way to build support.
And so Ted Cruz's office formally asked the Pentagon for answers about Jade Helm. "We are assured it is a military training exercise. I have no reason to doubt those assurances, but I understand the reason for concern and uncertainty."

Hey, look man. I'm just asking questions.
In sum, the Republican Party has a cyclical crank problem, when at least a handful of conspiracists are tolerated by even larger quantity of GOP members willing to play along for the sake of political advantage. It's got the likes of both Utt and Reagan, MTG and Ted Cruz.
If you're interested in reading more about Operation Water Moccasin, here's my original post:

paulmatzko.com/jade-helm-oper…
And just a few hours later, guess who decided to illustrate my point:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Matzko

Paul Matzko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PMatzko

27 Jan
Folks think futzing with Section 230 will be some kind of quick fix for the toxicity and craziness in our politics. But the causes of our national illness are far deeper than the internet platforms that host their content. Shooting the messengers won't solve that.
We should know this, right? I mean, we had a national experiment with this approach during the First Red Scare. The government harassed socialist newspapers, jailed activists, and tried their best to shut them up.
And it didn't work. The persecution only fueled a resurgence of left-wing radicalism leading to the Popular Front era of the 1930s.
Read 5 tweets
26 Jan
It's another example of a classic (and doomed) effort to deploy illiberal methods in order to protect liberalism.

But let me focus on the problems in just one paragraph of @emilybazelon's article.
It's rooted in what is--to be fair--the received understanding of broadcast regulation, a hazy idea of a past, golden era of equity, reasonability, and freedom in broadcasting.
But the government actions that are waved at by the author were actually responsible for major episodes of government censorship and the repression of political dissent, which affected people from across the political spectrum.
Read 13 tweets
25 Jan
I wrote a book about the Fairness Doctrine and how it was responsible for one of the worst episodes of government censorship in US history.

So I am somewhat alarmed at the calls percolating on Twitter for a new, internet Fairness Doctrine. This is a thread about why that is.
Let's start with what most people think when they hear "Fairness Doctrine." They imagine a time at an indeterminate point in the past when mass media was reasonable, balanced, equitable, and fair. It was a veritable golden age of mass media and the Fairness Doctrine was to thank.
Back then, radio & tv stations couldn't just air their opinions, spreading unchecked misinformation. No, they had to let the other side of any given issue have a say, giving the good guys a chance to check the bad guys when they told bald lies.
Read 70 tweets
23 Jan
I think what the "antitrust / link payment" crowd misunderstand about the role of digitization in the decline of local news is that online platforms are simply middlemen in what was really a massive expansion in competition *between* news outlets.
Once upon a time, the standard consumer of news had relatively few options. (For sake of simplicity, let's stick to print for now.) There was the local town paper (maybe two); you could subscribe to a regional/state level paper or one of the major national papers of record.
But if you lived in, say, South Carolina, you couldn't get fresh news delivered to you by the local / regional papers in Oregon, and vice versa.
Read 20 tweets
22 Jan
If a critical mass of people on twitter generate enough Section 230 hot takes, all that energy fuses to create renewed interest in the #FairnessDoctrine.

I wrote a book on the FD so let me walk you through why reviving it would be a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad idea.
First, the Fairness Doctrine was responsible for the most successful episode of government censorship of the past half century. While the Fairness Doctrine was technically created to encourage fair and balanced coverage of “controversial issues of public importance"...
...in the 1960s the Kennedy administration weaponized it to punish conservative radio critics. You see, fairness is in the eye of the beholder--which is the FCC--and the person who appoints the commissioners--the president--gets a say in what looks fair or foul.
Read 15 tweets
20 Jan
Yes, Operation Warp Speed helped on the margins, but I get so very tired of statists exaggerating its significance in order to avoid having to grapple with any cognitive dissonance over the massive gap between public failure and private sector success in the pandemic response.
Yes, the purchase guarantees were good, but Pfizer, Moderna, et al had already retooled their labs and production lines long before Warp Speed was created. May 15th is incredibly late in the timeline.

Remember, Moderna had a vaccine in *January*.
Worse, Warp Speed gave the feds, especially the CDC, greater oversight over vaccine distribution, which it has spectacularly bungled.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!