Every time one or other industry encounters Brexit barriers, representatives call for their elimination.

But there's still little or no recognition of why the barriers exist: because we chose to leave the Single Market & Customs Union.

We did that to ourselves. Not the EU. Us.
It's like being in a car careering down a steep hill and screaming "stop!" without acknowledging that it's only in motion because we deliberately took the footbrake and handbrake off.

We could have left the brakes on. We didn't. So we don't get to blame the hill, or gravity.
We can't fix the Brexit deal without modifying it. Not merely interpretation.

We can't modify the Brexit deal without winding our stiff necks in and accepting things we rejected so far. Our red lines must change.

(And all changes must be negotiated with the EU and signed off.)
Here's a for instance: if we agreed to adhere to the EU's SPS regime, with strong legislation to underpin it, then expensive and time-consuming phytosanitary checks could be eliminated on food.

(But we would have to give up on chlorinated chicken etc.)
ec.europa.eu/taxation_custo…
That's what compromise looks like: you have to surrender something to get something.

At the moment, all we seem prepared to surrender is our wits and our credibility.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Edwin Hayward 🦄 🗡

Edwin Hayward 🦄 🗡 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @uk_domain_names

11 Feb
We import more food than we export, across every single product category (opposite is true of beverages).

We depend on the EU for 26% of all our food, and for 57.8% (26/45) of all our food imports.

Brexit has just erected massive barriers to that trade.
gov.uk/government/sta… ImageImage
At the moment, Brexit barriers are predominantly one way, because we're not yet checking incoming goods.

But we are due to implement partial checks from April (if that happens) and full checks from July (again, assuming we don't drag our feet).

Trade will become even harder.
Let's be clear what's going on.

The EU has two sets of rules. One set for members. The other for third countries, ie non-members.

(We helped write those rules while we were an EU member. We know exactly what they are.)

Now, having left, the third country rules apply to us too.
Read 4 tweets
10 Feb
Admittedly it crams a LOT of stories onto its online front page,
but the Express is absolutely obsessed with Brexit and with attacking the EU, with no fewer than 30 such stories on there at the moment...

Brainwashing with a power washer!

No wonder people were deceived.
They're also the only newspaper to still have a daily live blog devoted exclusively to Brexit, often with dozens of updates, and the most supernova of hot takes on it you can imagine.
By contrast, the EU have moved on completely (and why shouldn't they?)

Just check out the replies to this earlier tweet...
Read 4 tweets
9 Feb
Matt Hancock has said...

"People who need hotel quarantine will need to pay £1,750 per individual for the hotel, transport and testing."

Talk about platinum-plating. There's platinum layered on gold layered on silver on that pricing!
theguardian.com/politics/live/…
Normally, when you bulk-buy, you'd expect a discount.

Yet the Tories have managed to block book thousands of hotel rooms in hotels that would otherwise have been empty, and yet still managed to end up paying over the top rates for them.
To put the price into context, 10 nights at the Novotel (one of the closest hotels to Heathrow) starting tonight would cost you £632. The Ibis would be £440, or the Radisson £639.

You'd have to add lunches and dinners, but you would die of caviar overload before hitting £1,750.
Read 4 tweets
9 Feb
The dirty secret of Brexit? It hurts less the bigger you are.

If you're a large firm, you can amortise the cost of engaging extra staff to do paperwork.

You also face the same red tape as a small company - but instead of writing "20 widgets" on forms you write "2000 widgets".
Beyond a certain size, you can afford to engage dedicated hauliers, and that means your shipments will not get held up by problems with consignments carried on behalf of other firms.

If you need to register chemicals, again you're amortising a fixed cost across higher volumes.
And so on, and so forth.

Beyond a certain size, and assuming your products don't fall foul of Rules of Origin issues, Brexit really is just a rounding error...

until it's not.

Why? Tragedy of the commons. Everyone shares ports. If they get totally blocked, you're stuck too.
Read 5 tweets
8 Feb
"Hancock has also announced today that the government has secured 20m lateral flow tests from a contract with the Derby-based manufacturer SureScreen Diagnostics."

Is there a Tory connection? Would be weird if there wasn't, right? 🧐 theguardian.com/world/live/202…
Here's something interesting: the check is supposedly cheap and accurate, and the company offered it to the Government in March 2020, only to be ignored. So they sold it overseas instead.
thelondoneconomic.com/news/science/c…
Meanwhile, the Tories have forked out over £1 billion on dodgy lateral flow tests with poor reliability, with the money going to foreign firms...
huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/lateral-…
Read 6 tweets
5 Feb
What a ridiculously irresponsible article!

Yes, a single dose of vaccine undeniably provides *some* protection.

But there's no way that single dose represents "mission accomplished" when it comes to the vaccination programme - people *need* their second dose too.
Problem is, the more that high-profile articles such as this one take the Government propaganda position that "one jab = vaccinated", the less pressure there will be to deliver the second dose on schedule.

To repeat: one dose IS better than nothing. Definitely. But not the end.
And the snag is, a lot of the good work of the vaccine could be undone if people relax too far too fast - which is always the danger when they're faced with articles like this.

We need realism rather than optimism at this point. We've had far too many instances of the latter.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!