@FlohrFritz @ortrudethevegan I'm sick of the term "gender" in general. I'm tired of having to work out which distinct school of thought and/or sect the person using it subscribes to before I can even extract any meaning from what they've written.
@FlohrFritz @ortrudethevegan An apparent rite of passage in writing trans-related papers is to include some rough definition of what trans is in the introduction (example in image). I compiled a number of these, all on a single trans-related surgery, and it's a mess to read.
@FlohrFritz @ortrudethevegan If you simply glance over the various phrasings in the papers, you won't notice a problem. But if you actually look at what they say, they don't agree at all.
@FlohrFritz @ortrudethevegan The first question I considered was "does gender have anatomy or sex characteristics?". They all roughly agreed, although four of the fourteen had definitions that did not indicate either way.
@FlohrFritz @ortrudethevegan I then looked at whether the registration of a childs sex at birth was "assigning a gender", meaning "sex" and "gender" would be the same. Six papers said yes, one said no, and seven did not comment.
@FlohrFritz @ortrudethevegan I then looked at the question "is gender binary?". Nine papers were quite vague about this, three papers said yes and two papers said no.
@FlohrFritz @ortrudethevegan Out of interest, I wondered how many of these papers simply treated gender and sex as interchangable terms, for example by saying "gender dysphoria is discomfort with anatomic sex". That number was four of fourteen.
@FlohrFritz @ortrudethevegan Exactly why these 14 papers on technical surgical procedures (the kind of paper with gory pictures in it) felt a need to include a vague and useless definition of trans is unclear to me.
@FlohrFritz @ortrudethevegan That no one seems to care that they all disagree about what "gender" is also worries me. Even two papers that both cited the DSM-5 definition (which itself is broken) disagreed on the questions I looked at.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with J. A zombie ate my brain

J. A zombie ate my brain Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JLCederblom

7 Feb
The ICGP recently took down their trans guidelines and just the other day put a revised version back up. Let's see what changes have been made...
The first significant change is reworking the evidence introduction. That makes sense since it had nothing to do with what was being presented in the document, however the new version makes no sense either as there is only a single place where it is brought up. ImageImage
The main thing which has been reworked all over is references to other organizations. The overt surrender of medical principles to completely unqualified advocacy groups has been scaled back. ImageImage
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!