1/ The Ford gov't was supposed to return to the legislature this week if it wanted to continue the 2nd "state of emergency", which the cabinet could only keep in place for 28 days (now finished).
Our elected legislature would have had a chance to debate, consider & vote.
2/ Instead, just like they did in July with the "Reopening Ontario Act" (doublespeak much?), the gov't is managing to avoid the legislature (although it did pass the Act), keep the emergency orders in effect & continue to concentrate power in the cabinet (particularly, the CMOH).
3/ This is bad for democracy, for the constitution & for civil liberties. Other Western democracies are facing similar threats, with little concern for the preservation of important norms that undergird or way of life in a free society. Good article below about the UK experience.
4/ "It is essential that we don’t enter a semi-permanent state of emergency laws and basic rights switched on and off by the government at will and without democratic scrutiny. Lockdowns may have been necessary, but we cannot be locked down forever."
5/ Today, @JCCFCanada is in court in Manitoba, arguing one piece of this -- the delegation of broad powers into the hands of a single, unelected official -- the provincial health officer.
If the pandemic is over when we say it is (nyti.ms/2AMeUWO), we've got a long way to go. 75% of Ontarians are afraid & it seems most are willing to let the gov't do whatever necessary to keep them safe, for however long. It's now unfortunately political to say otherwise.
I said on @am640 today that the onus is on the gov't to prove that the ongoing suspension of civil liberties is demonstrably justified in light of what we now know about the virus (it's mainly a LTC problem). That calculus is different than in mid-March. nationalpost.com/news/four-out-…
But they won't justify it unless the media, courts and citizens hold their feet to the fire. And here in Ontario, with fear driving the agenda, it's clear that won't be happening any time soon.
2. As the sort of person who is sensitive to the "madness of crowds," I tend to observe from the outside with some fascination. This shift in cognition to more authoritarian tendencies has been quite evident in our fellow citizens who turn to snitch lines to report on neighbors.
3. It can be seen in the way people have rallied around a consensus viewpoint on the merits of lockdowns, & shamed those who questioned that approach. It's there in the demands that others be confined, masked & punished for any breach (even when it can't possibly cause harm).
A thread about gender identity & a proposed new law in Canada:
A bill introduced in the Senate would criminalize the provision of "conversion therapy" to people <18, including any effort to change their sexuality or *gender identity*.
This is concerning. While absolutely no child (or adult) should be forced to undergo conversion therapy to change their sexual orientation, lumping *gender identity* in with this will result in serious unintended consequences, just as there were with Bill C-16. 2/10
Therapists who counsel a "wait and see" approach for children who claim to have gender dysphoria may be captured by this legislation. If so, it would mean the ONLY recourse for therapists, psychologists, psychiatrists, etc. is to affirm a child's new gender identity. 3/10