New legislative session, new assault on academic freedom and campus free speech.

In Arkansas, Iowa, Missouri, and Mississippi, GOP reps have introduced bills that punish public schools and universities for teaching anything from the 1619 Project.

edweek.org/teaching-learn…
These laws are vaguely written, but that's by design. For example, the Iowa bill would withhold funding from any school that utilizes "in whole or in part" the 1619 Project "or any similarly developed curriculum". Gee, I wonder what that means.

legis.iowa.gov/legislation/Bi…
It's clear the issue isn't over the Project's factual accuracy, but rather its interpretation of the past. Hence, the MS and AR bills accuse it of promoting “a racially divisive and revisionist account" and the IA bill cites the state's interest in creating "patriotic citizens".
All of these are based on Cotton's bill from last year. No doubt there will be more to come. A South Dakota rep actually introduced one the other week, but withdrew it so he could focus on this instead.

thedailybeast.com/south-dakota-r…
Also in Arkansas, a rep has introduced a bill barring public schools and universities from offering any course, activity, or event that "promotes division between, resentment of, or social justice for(!)" a race, gender, political affiliation, or class.

arkansasonline.com/news/2021/jan/…
It would also prohibit schools from allowing any event or club that "negatively targets specific nationalities or countries", so say goodbye to Students for Justice in Palestine. And don't even think about organizing an event on the Uighurs!

arkleg.state.ar.us/Bills/FTPDocum…
Meanwhile in Georgia, it looks like a GOP rep is gearing up for something similar. He's ordered universities and public schools to identify whether teachers are talking about "privilege" or "oppression". Faculty say it's already having a chilling effect.

ledger-enquirer.com/news/local/edu…
OK, so far I'm guessing most of you are shaking your heads in disgust and/or frustration. Good. But here's where I'm going to take this thread in a slightly different direction. It will *seem* at first like I'm engaging in whatabout-ism, but hold on for a sec. I promise I'm not.
I think San Francisco's decision to change all those school names was idiotic. It deserves the opprobrium everyone here is merrily heaping upon it. Don't stop.

But here's my question: Why do you know so much about that case, but (I'm guessing) so little about all the ones above?
Or if not the San Francisco thing, pick whichever other Culture War flashpoint we're all obsessing over these days. Isn't it slightly unnerving to learn that bills like these are popping up in states across the country with nary a murmur on Twitter or in the national press?
There is a massive double standard here, or at the very least an unforgivable blindspot. I've been banging this drum for years now, but it's getting worse. It's worse right now than at any time I can imagine and I don't know what to do about it.

arcdigital.media/campus-free-sp…
I want to be clear about something. I'm *glad* the San Francisco story got so much attention. I don't care it's symbolic or that it's just one city. It matters. That's why this isn't whataboutism. You SHOULD be angry about it.
But how come nobody is talking about Gov. Kristi Noem's plan to use state money for a curriculum that would teach students “why the U.S. is the most special nation in the history of the world"?

rapidcityjournal.com/news/local/edu…
I have a couple of theories about what's going on, and anti-liberal bias is only one of them. Probably not even the most important. More likely, it's due to an ignorance of and lack of interest among many journalists in what's happening outside the coastal states.
I mean, you better believe that if a group of NY Dems proposed a bill prohibiting schools and universities from discussing, say, the biological basis of sex, a lot of people On Here would lose their minds! You know the crew I'm talking about. It would consume this site for days.
So again, why the comparative silence over what's happening in Georgia, Arkansas, South Dakota, Mississippi, Iowa, and Arkansas? Why do so few of these DC/NYC/California-based journalists seem to care? Hmmmmmmmmmmm.
Journalists who work this beat, you're doing it wrong. I don't know how you find your stories, but it isn't working. And that should bother you much more than it does. I mean, what else am I to conclude?
The blindspot has always been bad, but never this bad. And it's getting worse.
OK, that's it. I'm done venting now.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeffrey Sachs

Jeffrey Sachs Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JeffreyASachs

8 Feb
Been thinking this morning about whether there is a tension between critiques of the concept cultural appropriation (eg all cultures appropriate, adapt, evolve) and moderate nationalist @epkaufm-esque arguments against immigration (eg US culture is changing too fast/too much).
These positions don’t have to be in tension, but in practice I think they often are. Both turn (at least in part) on the idea of “feeling at home”, on the claim that one has a right to feel part of a community, or even the right to have one’s community persist over time.
I’m not saying these things are equally just, equally right, etc. And to put my cards in the table, while I have qualified sympathy for cul. app. concerns, I have zero for cultural nationalism. Still, I’m interested in whether, to a certain extent, these distinct ideas rhyme.
Read 4 tweets
29 Jan
I’m going to break my rule of no longer retweeting this asshat because these needs to be exposed and called out. You don’t blame Jews for anti-Semitism. Image
Holy hell. Look how this Orban shill wastes precisely zero time climbing into the anti-Semitic mud with Lindsay, so great is his partisan hatred for the Left.

Read 4 tweets
29 Jan
Re. The Tablet article on California's proposed Ethnic Studies curriculum, I really do think there's much less there than meets the eye. At least it pertains to Jews and Judaism. Read the sample lessons (Appendix A: pp. 485-514) and see for yourself.

cde.ca.gov/ci/cr/cf/esmct…
Most of the "objectionable" stuff discussed in The Tablet was either stripped out after the 2nd draft or is irrelevant (the past statements of the curriculum's authors). Meanwhile, the 3rd draft DOES include information on campus anti-Semitism and hate crimes against Jews.
The main point of contention, at least in regards to Jews, is the claim that some Ashkenazi Jews possess white privilege because they can pass as white, and that they non-Ashkenazi Jews don't because they can't. Make of that what you will.
Read 5 tweets
10 Jan
I regret to inform you that he is right. Obviously it's great that Trump is off Twitter, but watching multiple platforms flex their muscle in unison like this is terrifying and will absolutely be used to crush someone or something you care about.
I am not on board for this. I really want to be, but this feels like a terrible development, one that will absolutely be used someday against those trying to unionize Big Tech, expose industry wrongdoing, or threaten its political interests.
But dammit. Look at this. This is why we're in the position that we need private governments to solve the problem: because our public one was either unwilling or unable to act on its own.

Read 6 tweets
23 Dec 20
Every time I post a new study showing that university indoctrination does not happen (and there's usually one every 2-3 months), I get the same stubbornly dismissive range of responses. People just don't want to believe it. They refuse.
I don't have a long thread on this. I'm just very frustrated by the phenomenon, especially since it typically comes from people who've built their online personas around being fact-driven, hyper rational skeptics.
Most of them just say "Well, that wasn't my experience," or "Oh, academic proves academics are great, how persuasive! HAHA", which I get. A few also make vague science-esque sounds about sample size, constructs, control groups, etc. But there's never any substance to it.
Read 9 tweets
11 Dec 20
New from me: Drawing on a survey of 20K+ students from 55 universities, @RealClearEd and @TheFIREorg have ranked schools according to how healthy the free speech climate is on campus. Unfortunately, its design has a strong anti-liberal bias.

realcleareducation.com/articles/2020/…
Quick summary: In the survey, students are assigned a Tolerance Score, which is supposed to measure how tolerant they are of controversial speakers. And one of the major findings is that conservatives score much higher on Tolerance than liberals.

But there's a problem.
Here's the question used to measure tolerance. See if you can spot where things go wrong.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!