The fraud nature of the vote by @MittRomney@BillCassidy@BenSasse etc is evident that none of them call for the House GOP to bring up impeachment of former Dem presidents Obama/Clinton. Those 6 GOP Senators were not even on the forefront to uncover 2016 Obama DOJ abuses.
Senator Leahy is the presiding “judge” of the impeachment but he is also a vote/juror in it.
Odd that @SenateDems at the time did not move forward with an impeachment after he left office.
No, not odd.
Nobody sane thought that you can impeach a former POTUS until current Dems and half dozen useful idiot Sen. Republicans decided so.
The Senate votes if they have the power to impeach a former POTUS.
The Senators who are alleged victims are jurors in the trial of the alleged perp.
The presiding “judge,” Senator Leahy is also a juror and an alleged victim.
Amazing that the constitutional crowd backs it.
The 7 Republicans who voted to convict Trump were most in favor of “let Mueller finish his job” - a job which perpetuated a conspiracy theory that suggested the 2016 election was not legit, yet those clowns think Trump was wrong to doubt 2020? FRAUDS!
It gets better:
The @SenatorBurr led the Senate’s Russia investigstion which - again - was rooted in the notion that the 2016 election was not legit, yet he votes to convict Trump for doubting the 2020 results. Rich. Those 7 are hardly on the forefront to condemn elected Dems who repeatedly
encouraged and legitimized political/policy violence and unrest.
Summary: The wing of the GOP most vocal in undermining the integrity of the 2016 elections and most silent when Dems encourage violence, voted to impeach Trump for “inciting violence” by doubting the 2020 outcome.
In 2018, Dem insurrectionists tried to stop democracy (the confirmation of new a Justice) by taking siege of a Senate building; blocking the entry/exit of door and elevators for Senators. Few if any of the GOP Seven seemed outraged by it or even blamed elected Dems for it.
This is another illustration that the principles driving the Non/Never-Trump wing of the GOP are breaking norms (by impeaching a POTUS twice); permitting violence if done by Dems; getting media attention and folding for Dems. This is being selfish and stupid.
I am reminded by a reader what a degenerate fraud @MittRomney is:
Had Trump’s efforts to ascertain the integrity of the elections and his 1/6 rally prep been inciteful, Cap Hill Police would have not welcomed people into the building, and DC Mayor and the MD Governor would have had a full PD/Nat Guard mobilization DAYS in advance. Didn’t happen
because what Trump did was fairly normal political shtick in the eyes of the MD Governor, DC Mayor and Cap Hill Police. It is only after the fact that people reverse engineered his words (including doctoring videos of his speeches) to say that he spent weeks inciting the masses.
“Prosecutors” (House Managers) doctored evidence against the defendant, yet “principled Republicans” like @lisamurkowski@SenToomey still voted to impeach.
When prosecutors need to make up evidence, it’s a give away that they have no case and should lead to acquittal.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2 million non-Jewish Arabs live in Israel, and Jews were "Palestinian" the same as non-Jews.
On the flip side, Palestinianism today is predicated on the notion that the area should be free of Jews; the same as in Nazi Germany.
Israel = Inclusivity.
Palestinianism = Nazism.
2/ It's not that Antisemites attach themselves to the "Palestinian" cause. The movement IS antisemitic because if Jews are Palestinian, then "Palestine will be free" from what? The Israel government? Um, if we call it Palestine, Jews will still be in the government. Then what?
3/ "Palestine" is a geographic area that had Jews, Muslims, Christians, so to use "Palestinians" as non-Jews only is Nazism.
This is worse than a white guy who wants NYC to be 91% white as it was in 1948. It's worse because Palestine in 1948 was +50% Jewish, then Arabs invaded.
1/ Why didn’t Obama & Dems make Juneteenth a federal holiday a decade ago?
Simple. The day came into focus only when Trump had planned to return campaigning on 6/19/20. Faix storm ensued.
To own Trump, a federal holiday was born.
I am not complaining; I am giving you history.
2/ Check the Twitter feed of many congressional and Senate Dems, TV heads, and leftists pundits. Most of them literally never sent a tweet about Juneteenth before it became an issue to own Trump in 2020; some only had a mention here and there in previous years.
3/ For example, in all her years on Twitter until 2020, @SpeakerPelosi’s account had tweeted only 4 times abut Juneteenth.
In 2020 alone she tweeted it 4 times; passed a House resolution about the day and got it signed a federal holiday in June '21 by Biden.
- There are no 250+ deaths from the rescue; sure not mostly civilians.
- There is no famine; 99.9% people are full-faced.
- It is not a "camp" of "refugees." It is a fully-developed neighborhood by people who never lived elsewhere.
It's a movement predicated on brazen lies!
Gaza claimed that 23,300 of its citizens died in the first 3 months of the war.
That's 260 deaths a day; 90 days in a row.
If true, the strike in Rafah 2 weeks ago; the strike on a "UN warehouse" last week; and deaths from the rescue would hardly be news.
It's a BS Machine.
No one sane refers to Hasidim in Williamsburg as refugees despite their grand parents having escaped from Europe and from Muslim-majority countries 70-80 years ago. Yet grandkids from Jordanians who worked 2 years for Jews in Haifa in the 1940's, are called refugees...
Can a POTUS retroactively revoke his political opponent's presidential privileges which paves the way for a raid on and prosecution of his opponent who is now seeking immunity from this POTUS?
The answer is yes. Biden did just that.
A Biden Judge asked the attorney of Biden's Political Opponet if a POTUS has the authority to take out his political opponent, and if the answer is no then it implies that Biden('s DOJ) can continue to try to take out his political opponent...
1984 wasn't this convoluted.
The Biden DOJ asked Trump for docs.
Trump claimed executive privilege (EP).
DOJ went to the WH for help.
Biden Deputized the National Archivist to revoke Trump's EP.
She did.
DOJ affidavit mentions violations of Archive laws (created by action above) as a reason to raid! 🚨