So was Wakefield rightfully scrutinized and Drosten given a hall pass?
Many of the concerns raised about Wakefields qPCR are significant. But the one most cited (contamination) by Dr. Bustin was not.
He claimed Wakefield omitted an RT-Step.
Bustin is emulating this in 2020.
Wakefield is also nailed for Lack of an SOP.
Same story in the Drosten review.
The proper way to address DNA or RNA contamination is with DNases and RNases.
RT enzymes are active at RTemp and as the cycler ramps its temperature up to 95C.
#BustinBusted nature.com/articles/s4159…
@threadreaderapp unroll
Bustin continues to push for limited to No RT step in qPCR.
Precisely what he persecuted Wakefield for…and was paid handsomely for the testimony he has since contradicted.
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Posting again to remind folks that spike protein can drive mitophagy.
Now that we know the modRNAs are prone to frameshifting and there is a Mito peptide after the Pfizer stop codons, it wouldn’t surprise me if vaxxed patients have lower extracellular Mito.
While much attention has been focused on the nuclear localization, even cytoplasmic DNA can trigger mayhem in cell circuitry. Chronic activation of cGAS-STING can lead to tumorogenesis.
Chronic stimulation of cGAS-STING can lead to cancer development and Wafiks work just demonstrated that spike protein also interacts with this pathway. We know many patients can’t clear spike.
Let play a game.
Can anyone make sense of these contradicting Pfizer-Regulator documents.
So the SV40 Promoter is not responsible for plasmid manufacturing.
But it’s the promoter for the Kanamycin resistance gene?
The documents submitted to the EMA show they use 50ug/ml of Kanamycin to replicate the plasmid.
How does that work?
No Promoter, no Kanamycin resistance..
No plasmid manufacturing?
They also claim the DNA has no functional consequences.
Moderna’s patents disagree.
Maybe dysfunctional consequences is a better term?