Sustaining sovereign defence manufacture in context of UK defence is not about profit or ROI, though that's ok too. Its core is maintaining that critical mass for training the next cohort and maintaining both the theoretical and practical design/build/operate feedback loops.
Arguably, if sovereign defence manufacturers cannot sustain themselves with UK defence work, the MOD should be taking on an element of their functions and bringing them back in-house. Foreign kit and TTP's may not always fit our needs and that's a security issue in of itself.
We should be considering this in the likes of the IR directly and if cuts need to be made to accommodate it then this what to save - it is arguably more important to preserve an ability for long term design/regeneration when we are looking at having to cut back in the short term.
It is always ok to bring in foreign designs, kit and even TTP’s. We have always done so and often successfully. It is important to do this objectively alongside our own facilities to determine if introduction is good enough. And that what we bring in sustains that feedback loop.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Other Chris

The Other Chris Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TotherChris

23 Sep 20
A fast and loose thread on the broad history for the *sensible* reason why Nimrod MRA.4 was scrapped.

WARNING: Nimrod MRA.4 is an emotive subject. There is a lot of genuinely good work, blood, sweat, tears and lost lives behind the Tweets. Tread sensitively please.
We'll skip to the point at which BAe's (not BAE's) proposal for Nimrod 2000 using Comet airframes had been accepted, but after the point at which tooling for new-build fuselages had been rejected in the 1990's.
There was a requirement for 21 aircraft to replace Nimrod MR.2 and without building new airframes as proposed there was a shopping trip to buy up all of the remaining Comet husks we could. Numbers vary, but we'll settle on 21 assumed complete kits plus bits for convenience.
Read 23 tweets
9 Sep 20
A quick thread on the challenge the Army has in describing itself to decision makers and the public in order to secure funds for projects. A little tongue in cheek... Image
💬 “We need to replace an ageing squadron of aerothings. Our purchase will support our aerospace sector worth £34B in exports.”

- Royal Air Force Image
💬 “We require five warboats to replace our well worked vessels. We’ll need to place orders now though, for long lead items that warboats clearly need, such as radars, guns, rockety missiles and engines.”

- Royal Navy Image
Read 7 tweets
14 Aug 20
Observation: So this morning when it was just Apple who'd kicked Fortnite off their App Store because Epic provocatively breached their T&C's, the narrative was on Apple's cut. Now Google have also kicked Fortnite off their Play Store for the same, the narrative is on Epic's cut.
It's quite clear that Epic did not expect Google to also ban Fortnite from the Play Store. The social media campaign, gifs and animations they released about Apple minutes after their ban, yet are absent following the google ban hint at this.
It also seems Google and apple have either coordinated or are at least following the same tack.

Note the similarity in these two lines in their press releases:
Read 5 tweets
23 Jul 20
Thank you to all of you who have Followed, Listed, Liked, Retweeted and Replied over the years. You teach me at least six new Things every day! In gratitude, here's a mini-Thread of a few Threads that I have posted up over these years for your nostalgic pleasure. Grab a cuppa.
A thread looking at the Royal Navy's cancelled plans for a 155mm deck gun:

A thread with an opinion on Type 31 armament:

Read 17 tweets
29 Jun 20
This is the new US Army Infantry Squad Vehicle...

(Chevy ZR2 Bison).

1/ Image
...only in a stripped down and more Military looking form. A key requirement is the ability to be transported by sling-load underneath a Black Hawk.

2/ Image
Meanwhile, Ricardo are pushing a militarised Ford Ranger (T6 platform) for the British Army's General Service Vehicle....

3/ Image
Read 4 tweets
27 Jun 20
Let's take a look at the anatomy of a missile strike and get an idea of just how many aircraft and facilities it takes to land a (highly successful) missile strike using twin engine multi-role fighters. I'm looking at the air assets only in this thread. Images are representative.
In 2018 France, the UK and the USA degraded Syria's ability to conduct chemical warfare following reports of a chemical attack on civilians in Douma.

The air attack came from two directions: Anglo-French from France, Italy and the Eastern Med; The US from the Persian Gulf.
From the West, France air launched 9 SCALP EG cruise missiles.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!