TUBERVILLE tells reporters tonight that when Trump called him on Jan. 6, he informed the president that security had just taken Pence out of the chamber for safety.
"I said ‘Mr. President, they just took the vice president out, I’ve got to go.”
Seems significant that a senator is acknowledging telling Trump *directly* that Pence was under threat, and Trump still didn't say anything publicly about it.
We know Trump tweeted at 2:24pm that Pence "didn't have the courage" to overturn the election. What we don't know is if Trump's tweet came just before or just after Tuberville says he told him that Pence had been evacuated.
From what I can establish from the record:
-Trump spoke to Tuberville sometime between 2-2:15 (Deseret News)
-Pence was evacuated at 2:15pm, prompting Tuberville to relay this to Trump and end the call (Tuberville comment)
-Trump tweeted his attack against Pence at 2:24pm
NEW: Sen. Tuberville’s claim that he informed Trump *directly* on Jan. 6 that Pence had just been evacuated by security is a new and potentially significant point on the timeline.
Trump tweeted his attack on Pence around the time of that call.
@burgessev@AndrewDesiderio UPDATE: House impeachment managers say acquitting Trump could be a recruitment boon for Trump-aligned extremists who viewed the Jan. 6 insurrection as a success and harbinger of future violence.
@burgessev@AndrewDesiderio Raskin/Neguse now make the point that Trump can't use a First Amendment defense because he's not just a random guy spouting controversial opinions.
As president, his oath required him to uphold the integrity of the electoral process/Constiuttion.
@burgessev@AndrewDesiderio Raskin looks super pumped to get to impart basic Constitutional principles, usually reserved for his classrooms, on the Senate floor. He says "Brandenburg standard" with particular zeal.
NEWS: Tuberville speaks to reporters just now and stands by account he gave to @burgessev on Wednesday
"I said Mr President, they've taken the vice president out. They want me to get off the phone, I gotta go ... probably the only guy in the world hung up on pres United States"
@burgessev Trump's lawyers dismissed it as "hearsay" during the trial today. It's a key point that several Republicans considering conviction asked about and got no answer from Trump's team.
@burgessev More importantly: If Tuberville's account is true, it means Trump attacked Pence on Twitter about 10 minutes after learning Pence had been evacuated to escape the violent mob.
@burgessev The Trump team's response to this ignores what Castro just said to indicate there's "nothing in the record" about what Trump knew about Pence.
@burgessev This trial appears to be speeding to a resolution without witnesses, but that exchange screams out for Tuberville's testimony. He could easily confirm whether what he told @burgessev on Wednesday was accurate: that he informed Trump about Pence's evacuation.
"There was no insurrection," is an astonishing argument to make for what was obvously an insurrection, and has been described that way by senators and the Justice Department for weeks.
For exmaple, here's a DOJ filing in the Q shaman case last week describing the "insurrection."
CASTOR suggests he was the first person to raise Trump's 2:38 pm tweet calling on protesters to "stay peaceful."
He's wrong. The House managers dissected this tweet and said Trump's exhortation to "stay peaceful" was absurd since the violence was already underway.
NEW: The Trump defense opened its arguments with multiple demonstrable falsehoods before launching into a pointed effort to stir up a partisan rejection of the House's case.
They are also pretending that the House's entire case is about the word 'fight.'
It's a close call between whether the Trump defense is showing more video of Dems sayign the word "fight" — devoid of context — than actual argument against the House's impeachment case. politico.com/news/2021/02/1…
This is important: Trump's own lawyer inadvertently made the House's case for why Trump's words carry unique weight compared to congressional Democrats.
TRUMP team starting with pure partisan angle, calling impeachment part of a liberal witch hunt of "venageance" against Trump.
"No thinking person could seriously believe that the president’s January 6 speech was in any way an incitement to violence or insurrection.”
Trump's attorney, Mark van der Veen, suggests that Trump simply encouraged the crowd to respect the processes in the Electoral Count Act and the Constitution.
This is divorced from Trump's entire course of conduct post-Nov. 3, including Jan. 6.
Van der Veen begins with a falsehood, suggesting one fo the first arrestees was a "leader of antifa." This not only perpetuates a conspiracy theory that the rioters were perpetrated by left wing extremists, it's just simply not supported by any evidence.