There's lot of excitement, anger and surprise at the news that Amsterdam has overtaken London as the biggest centre for equities trading in Europe. Here’s a little bit of perspective: 1/
This shift is one of the very areas where Brexit has a binary / mechanical impact: inside the EU, trading in EU shares could take place in London; outside the EU with no equivalence for stock exchanges, it can’t. So it had to move and has moved. 2/
In most areas of the City, the impact of Brexit is nothing like as binary and the relocation of activity will be much more marginal. 3/
The numbers look big but the economic impact (at least for now) is limited. Back of the envelope estimate: €6.5bn in daily trading volumes in EU equity trading switching from London translates into maybe £50m in annual revenues, max £5m in lost tax. Probably less. 4/
The location of where the trading is conducted has moved. Aside from a few dozen jobs at the exchanges themselves, the traders haven’t moved, the hedge funds and asset managers giving them orders haven’t moved. 5/
If these exchanges had moved their servers to Macclesfield a few years ago, I’m not sure we would have been getting excited about Cheshire’s future as a global financial centre. 6/
That said, Amsterdam has been the main beneficiary in trading and broking when it comes to Brexit-related relocations: at @NewFinancialLLP we’ve counted nearly 50 firms that have moved something to Amsterdam, and most of them are exchanges, trading firms, brokers and fintech. 7/
@NewFinancialLLP But before we start getting too excited about Amsterdam overtaking London as a financial centre, here’s a summary of the daily trading volumes in derivatives and foreign exchange (with equities at the bottom for context). 8/
Volumes in London are roughly 75 times larger, and roughly five times as big the whole of the EU combined. 9/
The City cannot afford to be complacent: we have long argued that Brexit will have a ‘drip feed’ impact on the City on jobs, activity and tax receipts. But anyone expecting the shift we have seen in equities to happen elsewhere is going to be disappointed. / ENDS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Inspired by President Trump's love of the stock market, here's what happens when you match the state-by-state results in US Presidential election with the value of US listed companies and the state in which they are headquartered: 82% Biden 18% Trump 1/7
States that voted for Biden represent 70% of the number of listed companies in the US with a combined market value of over $30 trillion, or 82% of the combined value of US stock markets 2/7
States that voted for Trump account for 30% of the number of listed companies in the US with a combined market value of nearly $7 trillion, or 18% of the combined value of US stock markets 3/7
It is good news that the UK and Japan have created a joint regulatory forum in financial services as part of their trade deal (detail from p106): a few quick and quite niche thoughts 1/ mofa.go.jp/files/10010706…
The forum builds on the EU Japan joint regulatory forum in financial services that was created last year and held its first meeting in Japan (conveniently) during the world cup rugby in October 2019 2/ fsa.go.jp/en/news/2019/2…
The forum aims to encourage closer bilateral regulatory cooperation to reduce frictions and also ensure UK and Japan are broadly aligned in international forums on global standards 3/