The Hollywood blacklist was a massive systematic decision across studios that actually began in the late 1930s and the early 1940s with government investigations into Hollywood, and included people who were merely suspected of having private sympathy to the Communist Party.
Keep in mind that during this timeframe Hollywood, in particular Disney, was interested in Union-busting and they attempted to use an overblown accusation of Communists in Hollywood as an excuse to deny film workers rights, or to bust their unions.
That said, after the Soviet Union switched sides in World War II, this activity died down until after the war when anti-Semitic neofascists like Gerald Smith began to reintroduce the idea to the American populace, referring to "alien minded Russian Jews in Hollywood" in speeches.
Then in 1946 William “Billy”Wilkerson, the publisher of The Hollywood Reporter still bitter about being unable to start his own studio, began to publish names of people he accused of being Communist sympathizers.
Congress, specifically the HUAC, began to investigate the claims. Among the witnesses called were Walt Disney and Ronald Reagan. Both took the opportunity to bash unions, and Reagan’s testimony was one of the factors that led to his divorce from Jane Wyman.
Following further HUAC hearings (the Hollywood Ten) where witnesses refused to answer questions on first amendment grounds, fearing government intervention into their monopolistic hold on the film industry, the studios quickly promised to not hire anyone accused of “red ties”.
The list of blacklisted professionals grew beyond the ten quickly, and was supported not just by the government but also private groups like the American Legion. Additionally a publication was founded explicitly to leak FBI documents from HUAC investigations to grow the blacklist
It’s worth noting, especially to @jonathanchait it seems, that the Hollywood Blacklist was often not based on public statements but rather on private beliefs, personal associations, forced testimony from industry professionals, rumor and innuendo.
One person was blacklisted because his name came up in passing in a HUAC hearing. He wasn’t accused of anything in the hearing, but after his name was mentioned he stopped getting work. That man was Lionel Stander.
If you look at Stander’s filmography you will see that he worked regularly until 1951, when his credited work stops for a full 12 years. It has already slowed because of his role in founding the Screen Actors Guild, mind you...

Stander did ultimately testify before Congress.
Honestly, if you get a chance, read Stander’s HUAC testimony and the play “Have You Now Or Ever” which dramatically presents his testimony—both are excellent.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Will McAvoy

Will McAvoy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WillMcAvoyACN

12 Feb
So far, Joe Biden has read and played the political situation brilliantly in his first three weeks in office and he's done so in ways a lot of experts -- and I -- did not expect.
First off, the days of entering office with a low disapproval rating are gone. Maybe they will return, but Biden entered the office with a bunch of people already against him, more than any President in modern history not named Donald Trump.
But his policies have been popular -- his COVID-19 relief package is more popular than he is and the individual elements of the program are extremely popular, including the direct checks.
Read 16 tweets
5 Feb
I’ve been talking about this all morning, and I’ve got to move on to other things, but first I have an observation from today that I just cannot escape:
A lot of people seem to think the problem with remote learning is remote learning isn’t working for their kids.

But a lot of these people don’t seem to care if their child’s teacher(s) live or die, so I think that maybe the problem begins there.
I have talked (and heard from) plenty of parents and teachers on this subject. Most of them acknowledge that this isn’t ideal. Some bring up the mental health of our youth; which of course is something I am attuned to and aware of, but I’m not convinced reopening schools helps.
Read 10 tweets
25 Jan
So, one claim I have seen repeated over and over and over again the past few days is that “Joe Biden reversed a rule lowering the price of insulin.”

This is not really accurate for a number of reasons.
1. Biden paused all rules made within the last 60 days of the Trump administration for review. This is fairly standard for any new executive from a competing party.

2. The rule that is related to insulin prices was not yet in effect, so for now it is just delayed.
3. The rule did not apply to most sources of insulin. The rule required community centers providing insulin to pass any manufacture discounts they received onto customers. That’s it. Even the Trump administration said the economic impact would be minimal.
Read 4 tweets
10 Jan
Something that is not lost on me but I forgot to mention is that the runoff system in Georgia was created explicitly to keep men like Raphael Warnock from taking office.
This seems like time for a mini-thread, as multiple people have already asked me to explain why.

So here we go:

The racist origins on Georgia’s runoff elections.
Before 1962 Georgia’s elections operated under a county-unit system where counties were individually given a vote and a candidate had to earn the majority of the units. Ostensibly to mirror the electoral college, instead what it did was eliminate the power of urban counties.
Read 8 tweets
12 Nov 20
Maybe it’s time to talk about what happened in Georgia in 2018 and why it is completely different than what is happening now, since this seems to be making the rounds of conservative talking points. since she was a Black woman no one actually paid attention to her complaints.
First off Brian Kemp, who was running against Abrams, was Secretary of State at the time and he purged 340,000 voters from the state’s voter registration, disproportionally targeting Black voters. theguardian.com/us-news/2018/o…
Kemp also put over 53,000 voter registrations on hold due to extremely minor discrepancies, again targeting Black voters. vox.com/policy-and-pol…
Read 9 tweets
9 Nov 20
The first example of a concession is said to be John Adams private congratulations to Jefferson after the latter’s victory in 1800. While concession speeches did not become a thing until the 1920s when radio became a popular medium. Still concessions by telegram were common.
But the election I want to focus on here is the Election of 1916.

Democrat Woodrow Wilson was running for re-election against Charles Evans Hughes, who had resigned from the Supreme Court in order to run for President. Hughes was a compromise candidate for the GOP.
1912 had famously split the party between Taft and Roosevelt, which allowed Wilson to coast to victory. 1916 was different, especially among the early returns. The race was close but early returns were pointing to a Hughes victory. Indeed crowds began to gather in Times Square...
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!