Bill Baue Profile picture
12 Feb, 4 tweets, 2 min read
As original instigator & member of SBTI Technical Advisory Group since the get-go, this isn’t actually accurate. SBTI made methodology decisions on their own, without “approval” by the TAG. In fact, SBTI consistently disregarded substantive input by the TAG.
It’s already part of the public record that SBTI’s Sectoral Decarbonization Approach is structurally impeded from aligning with the 1.5C target — a fact that was solidified by the @IEA opting against disclosing data on its NZE2050 (1.5C) scenario late last year. Image
There’s another scientific study coming out in a peer-reviewed journal in the near future that will shed more light on this conundrum...
And there’s another scientific study in the works that looks at SBTi’s target validation process (another area where the TAG gave input)…

Stay tuned to this space for updates on these fronts.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bill Baue

Bill Baue Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bbaue

15 Feb
As an original instigator of @sciencetargets it deeply saddens me to tweet this thread on the formal complaint I submitted to the SBTi Executive Board on self-dealing conflict of interests concerns.

See here: bbaue.medium.com/formal-complai…
@sciencetargets The substance of the complaint is validated by a scientific study by Anders Bjørn & Concordia University colleagues recently published as an accepted manuscript in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Research Letters:

iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…
@sciencetargets Bjørn et al raise 2 key intertwining technical problems: (mis)alignment with the “latest climate science,” and what they call “emissions imbalances” — i.e., collective carbon footprints under- or overshooting the carbon budget (slices of the pie = less or more than a single pie).
Read 27 tweets
13 Feb
Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future

frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…

Abstract: We report three major and confronting environmental issues that have received little attention and require urgent action.
First, we review the evidence that future environmental conditions will be far more dangerous than currently believed. The scale of the threats to the biosphere & all its lifeforms—including humanity—is in fact so great that it is difficult to grasp for even well-informed experts
Second, we ask what political or economic system, or leadership, is prepared to handle the predicted disasters, or even capable of such action.
Read 6 tweets
2 Feb
Dasgupta economics of biodiversity report:

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

“Truly sustainable economic growth and development means recognizing that our long-term prosperity relies on re-balancing our demand of nature’s goods and services with its capacity to supply them.”
"It also means accounting fully for the impact of our interactions with nature across all levels of society,” Dasgupta continued. "Covid-19 has shown us what can happen when we don’t do this.”
See here for links to full and abridged report, headline messages, reactions, etc

gov.uk/government/pub…
Read 6 tweets
14 Jan
In a presentation on @UNRISD thresholds- and transformation-based sustainability indicators I just gave, I point out that thresholds / limits could be viewed as leverage point 12 on Dana’s list ("Constants, parameters, numbers” — or #2: "mindset of paradigm".
@UNRISD Here’s the slide I use to illustrate this difference in leverage points. Image
@UNRISD [S]ustainability indicators should be related to carrying capacity or to threshold of danger…

Tons of nutrient per year released into waterways
means nothing to people.

Amount released relative to [what they] can absorb w/out becoming toxic/clogged begins to carry a message Image
Read 5 tweets
9 Jul 20
.@GRI_Secretariat released its Oil & Gas Sector Standard Exposure draft yesterday.

globalreporting.org/standards/medi…

How did it handle Sustainability Context? you may ask.

Well, let me tell you.
@GRI_Secretariat "Sections 2 & 3 include contextual information for the sector, including highlighting authoritative measures of sustainable development, referencing broader sustainable development conditions and goals set out in recognized sector-specific or global instruments…"
@GRI_Secretariat "This will assist an organization to report on its impacts in the wider context of sustainable development.”

OK, on to Sections 2 & 3.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!