ImageImageImage
Context: When cases were rising in October, Trump said it was just because testing was rising. That was wildly, irresponsibly wrong, as 3000 deaths a day for the last month show. Image
What Trump and Jordan either don't understand (or hope their followers don't understand) is the *rate* of positives was up then and down now. The trends are real, not an artifact of people testing (which folks do more when they think they might be sick).
And of course whenever a ridiculous claim gets lots of traction, it's plagiarized. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bad COVID-19 Takes

Bad COVID-19 Takes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BadCOVID19Takes

14 Feb
Image
Context: More than 0.1% are vulnerable, because more than twice the number have died in many places—soon, in all of America.

And those who would survive an infection aren't necessarily unharmed by the infection and their lives aren't "destroyed" by avoiding infection.
And zero have died from the vaccine—any deaths are much, much rarer than 0.1%.

In the clinical trials, tens of thousands of volunteers got them and there were ZERO deaths caused by the vaccines. In fact, more deaths occurred in the saline control groups. fda.gov/media/144245/d…
Read 5 tweets
14 Feb
ImageImage
Context: Two months ago, a lot of large accounts promoted the idea that deaths for 2020 were actually lower than 2019. This was wicked wrong.
I've read commentary about "bad takes" accounts that they're degenerate because they only dunk & avoid dialog. Posting images w/o tags is supposedly prevents dialog. Fair criticism.

So as an experiment, I called out a bunch of folks amplifying nonsense.
Read 5 tweets
14 Feb
Tony Robbins rant, illustrated.
Context: The "John Hopkins report" was a writeup of an online presentation that included a wildly incorrect quote that there had been no increase in overall deaths.
No category of deaths is significantly down in 2020; the COVID deaths are new and on top of normal mortality.
Read 5 tweets
13 Feb
Image
Context: One could imagine Fourth Amendment problems with contact tracing data collection. But a challenge to a regulation with criminal penalties requiring restaurants in Los Angeles to collect such information was voluntarily dismissed after denial of preliminary injunction. ImageImage
It's a worse COVID take than a legal take. Why tell 81,500 followers (and any government agents) where you are, but refuse contact if it turns out your server has the virus?
Read 4 tweets
11 Feb
Image
Context: This is the fourteenth time he's asked this question on twitter. Pretty clear it's not a good faith question, but a COVID dog whistle for those who think that flu cases and deaths are being fraudulently marked as COVID. Image
Good faith answer: it turns out that mitigation used against COVID is even more effective against less infectious flu. (Like reduced travel, WFH, masks, avoiding groups, handwashing, etc.) We're still testing for the flu, and it's really at low levels.
Read 4 tweets
2 Feb
ImageImage
Context: The answer is that vaccinating the 20% of the population that's least mobile would not necessarily have as dramatic effect on cases. And in fact, it seems to be working well for the >60 year-old population that's now mostly vaccinated.
Alex responded to this by disregarding it; complaining that the overall rates don't drop as fast.
But the fact that those getting vaccinated are less sick is evidence they have effect. In the last 3 weeks >60 have fewer cases, while cases among the unvaccinated rise. Suggestive. Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!