The political implications of this analysis help illuminate why so many progressives are reluctant to even *admit* the Democratic party suffered a significant setback with Hispanics in 2020
In particular, a lot of democratic political professionals who focus on the Hispanic vote are selling something this analysis says hurts the party.
Fortunately, Joe Biden will have an economic record to run on, and I think it will be a good record, and that should go a significant way to reversing this trend
If progressives have the right ideas about how to govern, how come California is so poorly governed? @ezraklein on a state that's choking on its own rules: nytimes.com/2021/02/11/opi…
@ezraklein One thing I would note is that there are blue states that do appear to have genuinely superior governance outcomes, like Massachusetts. So there is a good model in addition to some bad models.
I also think Ezra is right to focus on CEQA, which is all by itself responsible for a huge fraction with what's wrong in California. And unlike some other policy problems, it's one the legislature is free to fix whenever it likes.
Look either it's a serious accusation (in which case it is actually a serious error that Taylor attributed the comment to the wrong person) or it's not a serious accusation (in which case it's not a "scandal" and it's improper for reporters to try to make it into one.)
But this is the way a lot of tech industry coverage is conducted: Not merely aggressive and skeptical, as it should be, but treating tech companies and personalities as the enemy.
lol Portman reading from Neera Tanden's tweets, noting that she called Mitch McConnell "Voldemort" and compared Ted Cruz unfavorably to vampires
Rob Portman is upset about Neera's bad tweets and also upset about her deleting her bad tweets? Make up your mind, Rob Portman.
Now he's noting that there are bad tweets she didn't delete! And he asks how she decided which ones merited deletion. Some of the mean tweets about Ted Cruz are still up, he notes. (Maybe she assumed those would be popular with most senators on both sides of the aisle.)
How broadly are we expanding this list of words that cannot even be mentioned? It’s becoming genuinely confusing to read accounts of what Bad things were said when they cannot actually be reproduced.
There is a plausible enough case about the unique role and rhetorical power of the n-word meriting avoidance even of mentions, and with just one such word, that’s not confusing. But if there are going to be dozens of words you’re not allowed to even reproduce, that’s confusing.
Also, if you're going to level an accusation that (you consider to be) serious against someone about what they said, you should be pretty sure about who was speaking.