Telegram is doing *very* little to take down Nazi terror channels now that the Capitol coup attention is past.
We're getting some takedowns, but it moves like molasses.
The good news: when @telegram implements advertising, they'll be extremely vulnerable to activist campaigns.
Telegram has never been revenue-generating, which means there isn't yet a way to pressure them by messing with their profits.
As @nandoodles' work proves, though, advertisers don't like getting called out out for advertising on fascist platforms, much less terrorist platforms.
It's clear from Durov's awkward attempts to get users onboard with advertisement that he's no longer interested in paying for this pet project out of pocket (or whatever his previous funding sources were).
Where there are advertisers and profits, there's leverage.
It's absolutely astounding to me the number of folks who have done little to no research or work on Nazi Telegram but somehow feel qualified to say that deplatforming the terror channels is bad because they enjoyed dipping their toes in once & a while to supplement a hot take.
Deplatforming Nazis is good, actually.
If your research isn't strong or deep enough for you to know where the Nazis go next, that's an issue with your competency, not a reason to come down on deplatforming terrorists.
And if you didn't archive (which is *extremely* simple to do on Telegram, btw)... that's also a problem with your research methods, not damning evidence that deplatforming has made fascism impossible to document or track.
I've said it before, but Dem establishment electeds like Pelosi want to be treated with the deference we accord elder statespeople without stepping down & into that role.
You can't be a current elected *and* an elder statesperson.
By statesperson, I mean someone who acts as an advisor based on their experience, who has stepped back from a direct leadership role and into the role of offering and embodying learned wisdom.
It's not *just* on the folks planning to leave elected office in a coffin-- it's on the party for not making room and respect for statespeople elders.
I say "aging" not to be down on elders, but because the elders in the establishment have not built up any meaningful back bench of younger leaders and actively fight emerging young leaders.
The problem isn't the presence of elders, it's the absence of any sort of age diversity.
In lieu of accepting a diversity of age in leadership in a way that would allow for younger voices to be represented, they pay a small universe of privileged younger operatives to tell them what they want to hear-- that they can win young people with slick, empty marketing.
I have *never* seen @Marusya_1312 claim Black identity in all my time following them, this is made up bullshit and @ggreenwald is deliberately spreading misinformation trying to get leftists he doesn't like hurt or worse.
Sadie is one of the most consistent voices here calling out exploitative behavior by toxic groups and individuals hurting the left, and this wouldn't be happening if they weren't having an impact.
Greenwald's main agenda at this point is to just tear apart anyone who doesn't just sign off on his cryptofash bullshit and pretend like it's liberatory leftism.
He enables misogyny, racism, and antisemitism within the left, and he's just poison to the actual work.