For those still following the sordid tale: It's more than a year, and there's no trail of the virus until it caused an outbreak in Wuhan. No precursor strains or intermediary host, earlier patients had no market connection, & none of the animal samples tested positive for SARS2.
In the mean time, the closest know virus to SARS-CoV-2 was traced to samples collected from a mineshaft, 1000 miles away from Wuhan, where 3 miners died in 2012.

Doctors who treated the miners concluded that their illness was "caused by a SARS-like coronavirus."
Shi Zhengli's team went on multiple expeditions to collect viruses from the mine. They were brought back, stored and studied in the Wuhan labs.

I can hardly imagine them missing out on new SARS-like pandemic viruses.
But except for RaTG13, no genome has been made public. Two critical WIV databases have gone missing.

There are numerous anomalies in RaTG13 and the #pangolinpapers, which are taken as fundamental to SARS-CoV-2 origins.

This is a huge scandal.
Moreover, WIV was known to be studying spillover potential of bat coronaviruses. They conducted experiments on coronaviruses with cell and animal models, and significant biosafety flaws were evident in their labs.

These are all facts.
Meanwhile, simultaneous construction, maintenance and renovations projects were going on in WIV.

Sewage treatment, sample storage, disinfection equipments, incinerators and autoclaves were being upgraded, creating significant biosafety risks.

A year after the fact, WHO was finally allowed some access to Wuhan. They sent a team vetted by the Chinese govt, and after two weeks of field visits, they prepared a report based on data vetted by the Chinese govt.

Let's just call this for what it is: an absolute farce.
No primary evidence was collected by the team. No independent audit has taken place. And no theory has been developed that adequately explains the lab proximity issue; a laboratory which specialized in studying exactly these viruses.
There is quite possibly a very simple explanation behind all of this - all it takes is a little negligence, or unsafe lab conditions.

In any case the unclear questions are too numerous to accept the zoonotic origin theory.
Or maybe all of it is just a big coincidence. Nothing to see here.

CCP is transparent, Daszak is just the beacon of trustworthiness, and there's no need to look into the labs.

And yea.. popsicles.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Seeker

The Seeker Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheSeeker268

12 Feb
"To maintain objectivity, the WHO must contend with the fact that Chinese govt-supplied information is simply not reliable. To base factual findings solely on the word of China’s government places an unwarranted degree of trust in..a totalitarian state."

thediplomat.com/2021/02/the-wh…
"Embarek..gave a nod to Beijing’s extraordinary theory..that covid may have been introduced to China on frozen meat packaging. However, there are factual issues with such statements. By Beijing’s own statistics, covid cases spiked in China over a month before Italy & Spain."
"Beijing seems to have played some role in securing Tedros’ position as WHO DG in 2017. The year prior, the WHO removed Taiwan from its observer status at Beijing’s request. During the pandemic, this exclusion..has meant willfully endangering the lives of Taiwan’s 24M citizens."
Read 4 tweets
11 Feb
“This was supposed to be an unbiased investigation, something the world needs and deserves, yet we’ve seen no indication of impartiality or transparency——quite the opposite, unfortunately,”

aidshealth.org/2021/02/covid-…
"This investigation must be continued and by an independent team that is not bound by the constraints of a host government that has erred on the side of saving face.”
“At the earliest opportunity after leaving China, the investigative team must release a detailed report and hold a press conference where they take questions from journalists, as well as from other virologists who have expressed skepticism on the findings,”
Read 4 tweets
10 Feb
"I was surprised to see some members of the team dismiss the accidental lab leak theory while seeming to suggest without any specific evidence the possibility that frozen food might have played a role," @jbloom_lab said.

washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pac…
"I remain agnostic about the origins...But it's important to have a careful independent accounting of the research...that was being done in labs in Wuhan prior to the emergence of this pandemic, and it doesn't appear that this team accomplished that," @jbloom_lab said.
All told, "China was the big winner," said @YanzhongHuang . "We understand that they are doing their work within the parameters of the government. But you don't want to jump to a conclusion based on several hours of conversation with Chinese scientists."
Read 5 tweets
9 Feb
WHO investigating frozen foods
WHO investigating Covid circulation in Wuhan before December 2019
WHO investigating Wuhan seafood market
Read 5 tweets
9 Feb
Scientific research must always be curious (2019.02.13) | An exclusive interview with Shi Zhengli on her award winning submission “Research on Important Viruses Carried by Bats in China” which won the 2nd prize of the 2018 National Natural Science Award

archive.is/BUhMI
"Research on Important Viruses Carried by Bats in China”, The team. archive.is/jKq7B 2019.01.08 | Except for Li Yan, all authors of Ge et al. (2013)
"Major breakthroughs have been made in molecular epidemiology, new virus discovery and identification, and cross-species transmission mechanism, and many original results have been obtained." | Virosin's feature article on Shi Zhengli's research award

archive.is/p67wi
Read 4 tweets
7 Feb
History of COVID-19 - Chapter 6 - Part 3: The key date of 2012 - when and how a virus related to RaTG13 could have passed to humans and in how long?

francesoir.fr/societe-scienc…
"The clock values ​​calculated by Benvenuto et al. indicate that the evolution time between SARS-Cov2 and RaTG13 would be between 7.3 - 4.7 years. This gives a range between 2012 & 2015 covering exactly by its upper limit the incident at the Mojiang mine."
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
"Therefore, RaTG13 or an extremely close virus may well be the ancestor of SARS-Cov2...In conclusion, obviously the sequencing in 2018 of the RaTG13 virus, from which SARS-Cov2 could certainly be descended, was not revealed until February 2020."
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!