Excited to share the results of @SWOG 1500, which we are presenting at @ASCO#GU21 & reporting in @TheLancet today. 1st, THANK YOU to patients & families. 2nd, hats off to a tremendous group of investigators. This was a team effort! Wanted to share how it all began: (1/13)
A telling snapshot from my "S1500 folder" on my computer. With mentorship from @PrimoLaraMD I submitted the concept 1st in 2012. Had advice from my mentor @DrChoueiri at the time as I conceived of the study design - interestingly, the proposal was XL184 (cabo) v sunitinib! (2/13)
My dear friend @Jeremy_O_Jones helped me w some preclin work & with emerging evidence from the P1 trial that @DrChoueiri#DrMcDermott#DrJanDutcher & I (along with others), we proposed the following formal design to the group in 2013: (3/13)
Obvious this made things tricky, both from a statistical & practical standpoint. Some companies pulled out & we saw encouraging results from @DrChoueiri's savolitinib study in @ASCO_pubs#JCO, so we pulled that in: (5/13)
Here is the timeline for emphasis. Have to confess, there were many times when I wasn't sure the trial was going to happen. I'm sure others with cooperative group experience would agree (@TiansterZhang@DrChoueiri@DrVaishampayan). But we pushed forward: (6/13)
Even once we got things started, it was not smooth sailing. You can see here that accrual was slow. We averaged 3.6 pts/mo. #SAVOIR, presented by @DrChoueiri at #ASCO20, accrued faster despite being a genomically driven trial! Again, advocates played a key role: (8/13)
So why this lengthy post that focuses nothing on the data? Well, I wanted to encourage brilliant young investigators like @ShuchiGulati@PBarataMD@AbhiTrip87 et al to be persistent in @theNCI cooperative groups. With time, your studies will get done! (10/13)
Now a quick work on the data, which you can see in detail in @TheLancet. Cabo is no doubt the standard for now for metastatic papillary #kidneycancer. Having said that, patients still need more! thelancet.com/journals/lance… (11/13)
Finally, REALLY hoping @maughanonc & I can push forward a study we have proposed through @SWOG evaluating cabo +/- IO, which he developed at @SupportingSWOG YITC (a formative course I attended 9 years ago!). Let's push forward for our patients! (13/13)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's Monday AM post-@ASCO#GU21 & clinic starts in a couple of hours! Lots to process - I'll try to tackle optimal 1L tx for #kidneycancer. I'll make a case for cabo/nivo, leaning on the beautiful (& timely) tables below from @lalaniMD, @SoaresAndrey & @brian_rini (1/15)
What about IO/IO? We have long f/u w #CM214 data w nivo/ipi, no doubt (@AlbigesL et al in @myESMO Open). And treatment-free interval discussed by McDermott @BIDMChealth is no doubt impt. But we've known data not as impressive for favorable risk (2/15)
And furthermore, as @ERPlimackMD points out in another tweet, impt to look at primary PD rates (seen in @lalaniMD's table) - nivo/ipi at 19%!!! CR rate used to be something we highlighted w nivo/ipi, but now comparable across studies (3/15)
My take on #CheckMate274: Is adj CPI now SOC for #MIUC? Not yet. Here's the design presented today at @ASCO#GU21 - first, thanks to patients & investigators (#DrDeanBajorin, @MattGalsky) who should be commended for completing an adj trial in #bladdercancer - no small feat! (1/9)
First, a trip down memory lane. Here is the data from IMvigor010 - adj atezo v observation. No diff in DFS/OS, period. No difference based on PD-L1 status. Could it be PD-1 v PD-L1? Hard to prove. Could it be obs v pbo control? (2/9)
I stole this slide from @MattGalsky in a separate thread i came across. Here he nicely highlights the attrition on control and experimental arms. IMvigor010 lost a substantial proportion of folks due to "other" reasons on the observation arm. (3/9)