1) No, yes, yes. *built
2) No they aren't, and only if you want to.
3) Completely untrue, and a direct result of the media lying to you about it - as evidenced by "muh Twitter" when it's on all platforms.
4) And? What do you suggest replacing it with?

5) He was way better than you, and you have very limited "interesting bits", if any.
6) No.
7) The state agrees with and loves this take. Anarchists shouldn't.
8) Yes.
9) No. We should all get fit enough to destroy what destroys us, and not be unhealthy.
10) No it isn't, and fortunately, few people care what you think.
11) Vague statements like this are worthless and require no thought or knowledge.
12) Ancoms are libertarians, and political libertarianism started w/ ancoms. You diss libertarian org tho.

13) But it *can* include organized theft and property damage? Your definition of "free" is deeply flawed.
14) Yes.
15) Not necessarily, and insisting such proves how unsympathetic you are to men.
16) "Voting" and "anarchy" are incompatible, entirely.

17) If you mean workers' unions, this is true in a modern context, but many OG IA were unionists, so...
18) LMAO agreed, but the fact you don't that'sd already happened is hilarious; we already exist under friendly fascism. Sometimes unfriendly, too.

19) Nobody cares.
20) Nobody cares.
21) Almost nobody is "anti-vaxx" and the term is engineered by statists who want universal experimental authority over the people they govern. "Vaxx neutral" is a better term - if you show sci, most of em might take em.
22) I think people shouldn't be influenced by others as to the chems in their bodies (see: vaxx neutral), and should stay clean/sober if poss. Clear minds better fight the state.
23) LMAO
24) Nah
25) It's literally called @timelineearth, you hack.
26) LMAO
To be free to make decisions with negative effects on oneself is good. To actually make the choices with negative consequences is not. Nothing wrong with criticizing someones' behavior - it's literally all you do, and all this thread is.

Et fini.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeremiah.exe

Jeremiah.exe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JeremiahEXE

16 Jan
Civilians need these for self defense against a variety of people.

We need them cause, even though the elites are pushing hard to make the whole world completely unfree, US isn't yet.

Example:

Your country arrests people for jokes and wrongthink, en masse - this one could not.
I get that you need to fearmonger, but the fact that you only included one real criminal in your post is telling.

So is the alarmism about the M134, a subject you clearly don't understand (next tweet).

This is why the UK should not be the US's standard.

One of the few which still exist, sure.

There are no M134s on the market right now, and acting like they're a dime a dozen is disingenuous, you hack.

Nobody is carrying one in a Chanel, and it requires expensive and heavy mounting to even use.

But OK.
Read 8 tweets
15 Jan
THREAD:

"Muh NAP" is not the basis of libertarianism, nor is abiding by it.

Certain thoughts can render one not libertarian, at a foundational level, without action, or rights violations, and simply "not violating rights" isn't the foundation of liberty or libertarianism.
The belief in free will, and the meritocratic notions which spring from anti-determinism - THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF LIBERTARIANISM - are the foundation, not muh NAP.

Believing one's value is determinist, and not by their will, is anti-liberty. Can't be anti-liberty libertarian.
Like even NAP as a phrase even came so long after political libertarianism. This isn't a thing. Even in American right-libertarianism, muh NAP ain't the root, and it got on fine without it for many years.

Libertarianism didn't poof into being when the NAP was coined. Ridiculous.
Read 7 tweets
13 Jan
Someone on Reddit wanted this. I coulda done better, but it was taking too long.

reddit.com/r/SonicTheHedg… Image
Someone else asked for "da gren". Image
"Da pink" request. Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!