Treasury Committee report on handling any future pandemic.
- the Govt must produce impact assessments quantifying harms and benefits of each policy choice
- economists, as well as epidemiologists and health experts, should have a seat where social restrictions are decided
At present, we do not have the right machinery of govt to make good decisions. Ministers need multidisciplinary, competitive expert advice, and Parliament must be empowered to do its job. Otherwise, scientists will continue to be dragged into the political domain.
We need a set of checks to prevent Govts from overreaching.
Require proper impact assessments, forcing ministers to engage in a rigorous, cross-departmental exercise, weighing up benefits and harms of each proposed restriction on health, education, economy and personal liberty.
Combined with reforms to the quality of modelling and the structure of expert advice, these protections would dramatically improve the advice given to ministers, the quality of policy, and the functioning of our democracy, which in turn boosts public confidence and compliance
Ministers produce better results when held to account at the despatch box. So too will scientists, when their monopoly on advice comes to an end, and when they are rigorously examined by devil’s advocates.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zoe Keller

Zoe Keller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KellerZoe

17 Feb
Data show the UK did not suffer a bigger contraction than the €Z in 2020 (confusion due to different GDP measurement models: a like-for-like was -4,8% instead of -10%) and is better placed to bounce back to pre-pandemic GDP levels in 2021.
By AEP
telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/…
The UK economy did not suffer a bigger contraction than the eurozone last year. The narrative, believed by the London media,
never made sense. We now have the data, and we can see more clearly that it never happened. It was a story of apples and oranges.
Confusion over past data is due to measurement models. The ONS deducts a fall in visits to the doctor and reduced classes at school from accrued GDP. Most other countries do not. They calculate extra health spending as a boost to GDP. Hence a giant anomaly.
Read 22 tweets
3 Feb
Draghi ushers in the counter-revolution but he can’t save Italy. Those in EU circles and the bond markets celebrating this insider riconquista should be careful what they wish for — AEP
telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/…
Italy has gone through the gears, from a democratic revolt against the € and the country’s pro-EU elites, all the way to the other extreme of a technocrat government under the ultimate Mr Euro, without any election along the way.
The stitch-up has been breath-taking. The appointment of Mario Draghi to navigate the dangerous waters of the next two years is astute but EU circles and bond markets celebrating this insider riconquista should be careful what they wish for.
Read 26 tweets
2 Feb
Last launch: SN8 (Dec 9 2020)
Starship | SN8 | High-Altitude Flight Recap
Read 10 tweets
2 Feb
LIVE: Starship SN9 Flight Test
8am-6pm CT/ 1400-2400 UTC
Boca Chica (TX)

Estimated Launch Time in about 03:14:00

Road Closed, Crane Moved
Next: Village Clearing ...
See @bluemoondance74 for updates
Read 9 tweets
1 Feb
There is such thing as a strategically important industry.
In other words, not everything can be left to the market: industrial strategy and takeover laws will need to change to make Britain more resilient.
telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/01/3…
The decline of British manufacturing, we had been told for years, don't matter: we are a services economy. But our struggles with procuring protective equipment, testing and even the early obstacles to vaccine production, were all connected to this lack of capacity at home.
Our successes have occurred where the state has worked strategically, in partnership, with scientific institutions and the private sector.
Read 4 tweets
15 Jan
With the second impeachment of Trump, Congress violated six separate provisions of the Constitution.

thehill.com/opinion/judici…

By @AlanDersh
1. it violated the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from abridging free speech. By impeaching Trump for free speech that was protected by the unanimous Supreme Court decision in the case of Brandenburg versus Ohio, the First Amendment was violated.
2. It violated the substantive impeachment criteria in the Constitution, which limits impeachment to “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” It cannot be a high crime or misdemeanor for a president to deliver remarks protected by the Constitution.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!