Yoram Hazony Profile picture
15 Feb, 16 tweets, 3 min read
In liberal societies, the custom of giving honor to your parents has mostly been wiped out by equality (and now equity).

Most young people don’t even know they’re being transgressive when they correct their parents, elders, bosses.

They don’t know they are dishonoring them.
If you learn the Mosaic Ten Precepts in school, you at least have to discuss the topic of honoring your father and mother—and what you owe older people and ancestors more generally.

When Bible education was eliminated from the schools, all this became alien terrain.
When you come from a traditional society, the entire spectacle of young employees telling their bosses how to run a university or a newspaper looks obscene.
It’s not just the contempt for your elders that’s the problem.

When your general attitude is one of judging your elders, you stop being able to learn from them.
Most people don’t realize this: That honoring your parents, grandparents, teachers, and employers is a way of opening your own mind so that you can learn from them.

A young person who doesn’t honor his parents and elders inadvertently shuts off his mind from learning from them.
That’s the cause of a very large proportion of the lunacy we see across society.

Many young people really don’t know that they have a great deal to learn from people with 30 or 40 years of experience being a parent or an employer or anything else.
What we’re seeing is not just a conscious decision to throw out everything that tradition, history and experience can teach—because the past is just bad.
It’s actually an unconscious decision:

It starts with thinking you know enough to judge your elders—and proceeds directly to your mind cutting off the input channel from each such older person as you place yourself above them.
That’s the secret of the present moment. Most young people think to themselves:

“I love my parents and grandparents. I respect my teachers and my employers.”
They don’t realize that you can *feel* like you are loving and respecting you elders—while in reality you have cut yourself off from being able to learn from them at all.
In fact, many young people are only willing to honor and learn from their friends.

That feels good because they think more like you do, and because it feels equal: Your friends teach you and you teach them.
But in an important sense, learning from your friends isn't really learning. It traps you in an "experience bubble" with people whose experiences are very similar to yours.
The reason we have parents, grandparents, and teachers is to give us lifelong access to the experiences of other times and places.

Only our elders can give us this. Books help, but they are no substitute.
To be clear: I’m not blaming young people for any of this.

You’re stuck with very real hardship, and the causes of your generation’s difficulties go back at least to WWII.
But if you’re going to do something to improve your situation, you have to understand what you’re facing.
I don’t actually know if your parents and teachers are really as unhelpful as you think.

But if they are, you’re going to have step outside the box and locate older people who really can reconnect you to the tradition.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yoram Hazony

Yoram Hazony Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @yhazony

3 Feb
In English tradition, the farthest right represents subservience to the laws and ways of foreigners (Rome), while the messianic revolutionary left represents subservience to the laws and ways of foreigners (Geneva).

Moderate Whigs and Tories represent national independence.

/1
Burke in his day stands for Britain as an independent country. He stands for the traditional British constitution, traditional English laws and freedoms, the monarchy and the English national church.

He also stands for alliance with the Tories to preserve all these things.

/2
Furthermore, he represents what he called the “Old Whigs” against the new: In favor of experience and tradition. Against the revolutionaries with their abstract deductive systems uprooting all things before them.

And so against Jefferson and Paine and Price and Turgot.

/3
Read 7 tweets
27 Dec 20
I have to agree with this point. I can’t figure out what’s supposed to be wrong or frightening about being a “Christian nationalist” (although that graphic does bother me—we Jews don’t place guns, or anything else, on our Bibles). stream.org/why-im-a-chris…
There are bad apples in every bushel. But *on average,* Christian nationalists are going to be a whole lot better to have around, and to be around, than Christian imperialists.

And Christian nationalists are much more likely to know what’s what than atheist nationalists.
So I guess the only way there’s going to be something really bad about being a Christian nationalist is if you’re the kind of person who figures that being a Christian is really bad, and that being a nationalist is also bad—so it’s like a badness double feature of some kind.
Read 5 tweets
17 Dec 20
My thoughts on the EU Court of Justice upholding new Belgian laws banning kosher slaughter:

1. Yet another good reason to avoid giving EU courts the power to rule on the laws of *your* country.

/1


hamodia.com/2020/12/17/eu-…
2. Frankly, neither Belgium nor the EU seem terribly excited about having Jews living there.

It seems like the post-Shoah willingness to make amends with Jews is running out.

2/
3. I’m tired of people telling me the purpose of these laws is to deter Muslims from living in these places—as if that’s an excuse.

If you’re willing to have Muslims, let them eat Halal.

If you’re not willing to have Muslims, say so and leave the Jews alone.

/3
Read 9 tweets
4 Nov 20
Wise words from a Republican veteran thinking about national conservatism tonight:

"Even if Biden wins fair and square, it will be a squeaker, and he will be hemmed in by a GOP Senate.

/1
"That is very different from virtually all of the mainstream predictions of a day ago, a week ago, a month ago. Today it is the left that is dazed and confused. Trump’s much stronger showing than most expected means that the 2016 election was not a fluke.

/2
"Hillary was awful, and then Biden weak. But the overriding fact is that nationalism is much stronger in the American electorate than almost anyone in the two parties realized until Trump came along. It is now a demonstrably durable, major part of U.S. politics.

/3
Read 4 tweets
15 Oct 20
What does “power corrupts” mean?

It means you get drunk on your own sense of vast strength. You no longer fear to cross boundaries that morality and prudence used to set for you.

You lose the ability to *feel* where the red lines are.
Two years ago, Facebook banned advertising for my book. They sent a few automated messages.

I remember thinking: These creeps don’t that know that they’re the abusers. They don’t know that they’re becoming the super-villains in a story they wrote themselves.
Step by step, they’ve grown more powerful. Step by step, they’ve grown more corrupt.

Now they’ve reached the point where they would publicly steal an election if they could get away with it.

They have no red lines. They don’t even know it’s wrong.
Read 5 tweets
13 Oct 20
This says adding liberal judges to the US Supreme Court will save the Court’s legitimacy.

This is true: It will make the Court legitimate in the eyes of those who think that only liberal institutions are legitimate. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
The question is: Why should liberals get to decide that only liberal institutions are legitimate?

The whole point of democracy is that some institutions are liberal and some are conservative—and yet both kinds are legitimate.
The problem is that the US Supreme Court has been a liberal institution since at least the 1960s. In all that time conservatives have granted legitimacy to that liberal institution.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!