Maybe this is stating the obvious, but with every passing year of marriage, I feel like learn or discover afresh: grace is the foundation of so much marital love.
Not just attraction or the passion of the Song of Songs, though thank God for that. Not just natural compatibilities or shared enjoyments, though those are wonderful. Not just the earned partnership that comes from having endured tough adventures together, though it's sweet.
Not even trustworthiness proven and trust given, though, of course, that's essential, too.
But grace. Marital love is built on grace. Undeserved. Unearned. This-is-a-gift. You-have-real-reasons-not-to-give-it grace.
This grace must permeate every area of the relationship: communication, parenting, interacting with others, intimacy, extended family, finances, church, you-name-it. So much of the marriage depends on forgiving, forbearing, overlooking, and then "I love you" in spite of.
Is your marriage struggling in a particular area? Ask yourself: what would it mean for you to show grace in that particular area? Your spouse doesn't deserve it, but how can you show grace?
If you tend toward self-righteousness like me, in the early years of marriage, you were most aware of how much you gave grace to your spouse. An ironic, unexpected joy of age is learning more every year how much your marriage depends on your spouse's grace toward you.
Repeat after me: "Living with ME is not easy. Praise God my spouse puts up with it day after day!"
It's like Tim Keller's remark that we become better spouses when we learn that "the biggest problem in my marriage is... me."
Yet, of course, you must give grace, too.
Over and over I tell my teenage daughters, find a husband who knows how to forgive and how to ask for forgiveness. Few things are more important in a spouse.
What's wonderful about loving your spouse through grace is how freeing it is. It frees us from self-pity, from the impulse to control, from the desire to change your spouse. You learn deeply and experientially what Jesus means when he said it's better to give than to receive.
Speaking of, I trust the sign-pointing connection to Christ's grace-grounded love for us is obvious: we've been loved by him through grace. Our salvation and life depend on his grace-grounded love for us.
On that note, maybe the best way to close is with the words of Mr. T.
P.S. A pastoral side-word to abused spouses who are tempted to endure abuse in the name of grace. Yes, love "endures all things," and you should endure in loving. But love does not "rejoice in evil" either, and sometimes you love the abuser best with the love of discipline...
whether that means fleeing, reporting, or anything else. You love by removing the abuser's opportunity to continue heaping up guilt on him or herself and by insisting on repentance.
My thread above applies to the more ordinary brand of sin, disappointment, and failure.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
WEEK 4:
This week I will recommend several African artists I enjoy, though I should admit up front how shallow my knowledge is. Africa is huge--54 countries. And I struggled to come up with 5 artists I enjoy?! Still, one has to start somewhere, and I welcome recommendations.
MONDAY:
I'm going to start this week with my favorite. Habib Koité from Mali has a number of albums, though I especially enjoy the first with his band Bamada, Muso Ko.
Another great album is one he did with American blues artist Eric Bibb, Brothers in Bamako. Look up the album and start with the song "On My Way to Bamako." Here's a live version:
Counter-cultural recommendation for pastors learned from @MarkDever: when you're thinking about leaving your church for another opportunity (pastorate; overseas; etc), consider telling your church BEFORE you make the decision, not AFTER. Invite them to pray with you about it.
A pastor friend recently did this. Asked the church to pray with him about moving overseas for a missionary opportunity. His church, though sad, felt blessed and loved to be involved in the process of praying and decision-making.
I also know brothers have done this when thinking about leaving one church for another. Had both churches praying about the possible transfer.
Sunday's piece from @DavidAFrench on the risks of over-identifying Christianity with a political party may provide a good conversation-starter for church elders to have. Some questions you and your fellow elders might discuss: (1/7) frenchpress.thedispatch.com/p/the-cultural…
1) What problems come from letting ourselves be identified with a political party?
2) What steps can we as a church take to work against over-identification/subversion?
3) Is it possible any of the unity we feel as a church comes not from the gospel but from our shared partisan convictions? IOW: is there room in our church both for Matthew the tax collector (can work with Rome) and Simon the Zealot (can't work with Rome) to follow Jesus?
Three wrong postures for a Christian toward politics and one right posture: 1) The Jonah option--withdraw. Forget those nasty Ninevites. Flee to Tarshish.
2) The Judah option--capitulate. Make peace with the world for the sake of its silver.
Probably the biggest temptation for evangelicals: 3) The Peter-with-a-sword-in-the-garden-of-Gethsemane option--utopianism/worldliness. We mean well, but give short-term political outcomes an outsized importance and fail to see the bigger realities at stake.
A better posture: 4) The Daniel option--represent. We have a pagan king who might feed us to the lions. But we serve him with honor, never fearing him, because we know the Lord holds the king in his hands, and we represent the Lord.
The idea of “human dignity” has become a bedrock principle in contemporary jurisprudence (see esp. Kennedy’s Obergefell opinion). Yet what happens when we do not ground our ideas about human dignity in God via the imago dei? Three things... (1/16)
First, we will define “human” and “dignity” on our own secular terms.
Second, we will feel morally constrained to impose those secular views…at almost any cost. After all, we image-bearers have been designed by God to desire justice, and those secular views of dignity now seem just. (IOW: our view of justice roots in our view of human dignity.)
Let me connect two conversations you may have never thought to connect: church polity and structural injustice.
(Haha! Only from a 9Marks guy, right?)
If you recognize the reality and relevance of one, you should be able to recognize that of the other. 1/7
For years, 9Marks has been teaching that church polity shapes individual Christian discipleship. Church polity teaches me that my Christianity is not about just me and Jesus. It means being a church member, which is to say, part of a family and body, with various duties. 2/7
The "rule structure" that is a church's polity broadens my sense of identity, shapes my values and ambitions with respect to Christ and his followers, and enumerates my responsibilities and obligations to this body. 3/7