The problem with Trump 2024 is that you're actually just voting to reelect Jared Kushner
with another serving of Ivanka's bossgirl "dad don't do that it's mean and makes me look bad" liberalism
Trump's refusal/inability to govern (without Jared's permission) brought us to where we are now by enraging and empowering our enemies through his pro-corporate, pro-crime policies. If you think things are bad now, it's because we had an ineffective leader for the last four years
"It's better than what we have now." Okay, so another four years of tweeting but no governance (unless approved by Jared) and giving our enemies ammunition so that when he leaves office again things will be even worse, but at least QAnon will experience a revival
The argument that "well at least Trump will be slightly better than a Democrat" is an acknowledgement that he went from the goD eMpeRor to "look he's the lesser of two evils." Why not DeSantis or someone else who is competent in that case?
Fortunately for Mexicans, Jared didn't allow Trump to build the wall, end birthright citizenship, end sanctuary cities, etc
Here are some articles related to this thread, some of which I worked on with Trump administration and campaign officials

1. amgreatness.com/2020/11/13/for…

2. amgreatness.com/2021/01/11/gri…

3. amgreatness.com/2021/01/17/rew…

4. amgreatness.com/2021/02/06/the…
Trump didn't build the wall but in some cases made it easier to cross the border and most of his immigration policies will be eviscerated because he put a comms guy in charge of immigration policy (Miller) and an immigration lobbyist at DHS (Wolf) while Biden brought top laywers
What is needed is a better, competent leader who has the will to implement Trump 2016 policies or at least the wisdom to delegate to the right people instead of subversives like Jared Kushner, Brooke Rollins, people who would be at home in a Jeb Bush or Obama White House
What is as or more important than the individual who will lead is the ideology and the movement behind them. With Trump, these things collapsed into a personality-based movement so it naturally didn't matter that he ran as a populist and then served up the Mitch McConnell agenda
"But Trump was a disrupter!!!" By the end of his presidency, all of our enemies are stronger, enraged, and emboldened. Everyone from Jeff Bezos to Jim Comey and Jack Dorsey is better off now than ever. Trump filled the White House with neocons like Elliott Abrams to John Bolton
The CEO of Gab: Trump won't even use our platform because Jared won't let him

My mentions: Trump is super based and can't be controlled by anyone that's why we need him to run again in 2024

nationalfile.com/torba-dopey-ad…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pedro L. Gonzalez

Pedro L. Gonzalez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @emeriticus

16 Feb
It cannot be said enough that conservatism's love affair with big business makes no sense because big business is the driving force of woke ideology in the United States
Blaming it singularly on universities is a cope or a bad reading of events. The right should read more Marx without the blinders amgreatness.com/2021/02/02/ame…
There has always been a disintegrating tendency in capital, which everyone from Marx to GK Chesterton to Belloc observed. The idea that academia is solely responsible, that big business was just an innocent bystander, is absurd. The right will lose for as long as it ignores this
Read 6 tweets
15 Feb
Conservatism must be destroyed if there is any hope for a better future. Here are some articles I've written on the what, how, and why.

"We must forge a revolutionary movement indigestible to the current establishment." chroniclesmagazine.org/middle-america… 1/
"The truth is that the political economy of the United States is no longer capitalism but managerialism, which slit capitalism’s throat sometime in the 20th century." amgreatness.com/2021/02/02/ame… 2/
"Conservatives proclaim the supremacy of self-interest, of anti-social, atomizing individualism even as it facilitates the consolidation of control over our lives by a collective of managerial elites." amgreatness.com/2021/02/12/con… 3/
Read 5 tweets
13 Feb
The left is generally better than the right at producing aesthetically appealing content and that is a problem. The right just slaps some stars or a cannon or the constitution on something and calls it a day. This must change, return to better aesthetics
Sorry to say it but facts and logic alone don't mean much. You're not going to inspire people with sterile power point graphics
I personally really like the retro synthwave aesthetic because it is optimistic, enthusiatic, forward thinking
Read 6 tweets
12 Feb
Yes, because cancel culture is just the inevitable enforcement of mores. Some behavior, speech, etc should be considered unacceptable. Conservatives have simply deluded themselves into believing a morally neutral society is possible or desirable, quitting the field to the left 1/
We should want to cancel people who push woke ideology. We should want to cancel people who teach our children to hate their parents, their country, their ancestors, their religion. Conservatives like Jenna are fundamental useless in this fight 2/
Morally neutral, non cancel culture society is an impossibility, it has never existed in the United States or anywhere and never will, the closest thing would be anarchy 3/
Read 4 tweets
10 Feb
To watch sports today is to subsidize a class of ungrateful, often illiterate, often criminal people who get paid millions of dollars to play a game while lecturing you about how awful are you and your country. It also tends to turn men into spectators in the same way porn does
You're also enriching cynical managers who basically think that the more openly they and their team hate America and its people, the more popular the team will become. What is the upside to this, besides dopamine?
The left, to their credit, will boycott effectively to protest things they view as threatening to themselves. The right, on the other hand, finds every reason to not boycott, to watch another game without the national anthem and with players kneeling
Read 8 tweets
10 Feb
TPPF argues government can't pick winners and losers--bailouts bad. Irony: TPPF receives millions from oil and gas industry donors. So, TPPF is funded by a subsidized, bailed-out industry that government chooses as a winner. In other words, they're frauds 1/
"The US oil and gas industry has received more than $10 billion from the federal government to cushion losses during the pandemic, according to a recent report analyzing federal financial data." Will TPPF return bailout donor money? 2/ qz.com/1936859/the-us…
Conservatives actually love subsidies. They love "socialism"! But only when it benefits their donors in gas and oil, in the defense industry, etc. They're actually fine with the government picking winners--so long as those winners donate to their think tanks 3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!